- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Durham's Legacy
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:04 pm to supatigah
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:04 pm to supatigah
“Russia hacked the election!”
A nauseating media refrain throughout 2017. And remember kids, no matter what Slotard and VOR try to tell you, they were getting their information straight from Obama administration sources who knew it was a lie.
A nauseating media refrain throughout 2017. And remember kids, no matter what Slotard and VOR try to tell you, they were getting their information straight from Obama administration sources who knew it was a lie.
3
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:10 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Slotard
Lol
I'm using that.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:12 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
A nauseating media refrain throughout 2017. And remember kids, no matter what Slotard and VOR try to tell you, they were getting their information straight from Obama administration sources who knew it was a lie.
SFP is a big institutions guy. He loves to defend them
This thread is a pretty good indicator of how massive SFP's ego has become. He said he was educating us twice in this thread. I always felt like he was a healthy dose of full of shite in a good way but now I see he is full of himself more than anything.
The funny thing about some lawyers is they often get huge egos because they know we need them to help us with the rules. And they are masters of the rules. So there is this superiority element to a lot of them and their approach to the world.
But pull them out of their rules world and they are often just as stupid as anyone else. I think that is why some of the board lawyers are so pro institutions. The institutions and the rules are their comfort zone,
Like accountants and coders and engineers, AI is going to replace most of them anyway.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:14 pm to Vacherie Saint
anyway moving on
this is a pretty good read on how the russians approached 2016 and what they actually did and didnt do
The Independent Article on DUtch Intelligence hacking the hackers
this is a pretty good read on how the russians approached 2016 and what they actually did and didnt do
The Independent Article on DUtch Intelligence hacking the hackers
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:28 pm to Houag80
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:29 pm to tadman
Good job 
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:45 pm to bstew3006
quote:
At no point have you admitted this behavior deserves prosecution
That ship has sailed and after the USSC ruling on immunity may have never existed.
quote:
. Instead, you openly called these actions “subjective opinions” and totally ignored the blatant misconduct.
Because the subjective opinions are the important variable giving them legal cover.
quote:
That’s not just minimizing, that’s full-on defending.
I have not defended them. In your improper description of what you think I did, maybe, but that's not reality.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:45 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
I can see why you're holding him up as your proof of accountability for the frickery around Russiagate
Strawman
That's what you are trying to do, apparently.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:46 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
yeah but clinesmith got probation or something so no worries.
You say this in response to something that isn't criminal
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:46 pm to supatigah
quote:
the narrative from MSM i
Has nothing to do with potential criminality of Obama, et al.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:48 pm to supatigah
quote:
SFP is a big institutions guy. He loves to defend them
There is no defense.
It's describing the reality of these actions within our legal framework (institutions).
quote:
He said he was educating us twice in this thread.
Have you seen the idiocy and lies people keep promoting?
quote:
The funny thing about some lawyers is they often get huge egos because they know we need them to help us with the rules. And they are masters of the rules. So there is this superiority element to a lot of them and their approach to the world.
This situation isn't that complicated.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
I see the amateur legal analyst is chiming in.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:51 pm to Gifman
It's very necessary. Just look at all the fantasies and outright bullshite being posted about this situation
I mean these people are trying to manufacture a treason charge
I mean these people are trying to manufacture a treason charge
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Didn't Durham sang the song "I am the Walrus Goo goo g'joob"?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That ship has sailed and after the USSC ruling on immunity may have never existed.
Ah, so now the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity somehow protects Brennan, Clapper, and the rest of the unelected intelligence crew? That’s quite the stretch, immunity for the president doesn’t give retroactive cover to his underlings.
But I get it…if you can’t defend the actions directly, just point to a completely unrelated legal shield and hope no one notices.
You’re not making a legal argument. You’re making excuses. And bad ones at that.
quote:
I have not defended them. In your improper description of what you think I did, maybe, but that's not reality.
If it walks like a defense, rationalizes like a defense, and protects like a defense…it’s a defense.
You’ve spent the entire thread framing misconduct as subjective nuance, downplaying consequences, and treating legal immunity as a moral pass. That’s not some misread, that’s what you’ve written.
You don’t get to build the shield and then act shocked when people point out you’re holding it.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:hardly
quote:
I can see why you're holding him up as your proof of accountability for the frickery around Russiagate
Strawman
quote:
A “differing interpretation” doesn’t excuse altering intel, lying to a FISA court, or concealing findings that contradicted the chosen narrative or their framing…That’s not opinion, that’s misconduct
note that this was all completely ignored
quote:
I specifically covered it. Clinesmith was prosecuted.
Take the L
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:58 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Take the L
Not an L
I'm not "excusing" anything, and I already cited the consequences for the person who committed objective fraud. The rest is inappliable for reasons I already stated, but I'll state them again
Obama and those revealed in the Russiagate docs didn't present any evidence to FISA courts.
The rest they can default to a matter of opinion, as I've explained 100x already
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Did he complete probation? What about the DC Bar? Surely they came down pretty hard on him. Or was there frickery there as well?
quote:
yeah but clinesmith got probation or something so no worries.
You say this in response to something that isn't crimina
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:consequences? Are you sure?
and I already cited the consequences for the person who committed objective fraud
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's very necessary. Just look at all the fantasies and outright bullshite being posted about this situation I mean these people are trying to manufacture a treason charge
Ah, there it is, the emotional unraveling of Poli-boards self-appointed legal scholar.
You came in swinging with your “necessary analysis,” and now you’re shouting about “fantasies and bullshite” like the thread personally betrayed you. Calm down, counselor, no one’s putting you on the bench.
No one’s manufacturing anything, the misconduct happened, the evidence is there, and your entire role here has been to dress it up just enough to pretend it’s not corruption.
But hey, keep calling everyone else irrational while you spiral because nobody’s buying the spin. Solid strategy, Saul Goodman
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News