- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Durham's Legacy
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I did not
You literally spent half the thread downplaying or deflecting from the clear manipulations by Obama-era officials, then pretended it was all just a “difference of opinion.” That’s exactly what defending looks like.
You can keep saying “I did not,” but when every reply minimizes the abuse of power or reframes it as a valid perspective, you’re not neutral…you’re running cover.
Your intellectual dishonesty isn’t subtle. It’s right out in the open for everyone to see.
2
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:14 pm to Decatur
I bet Tulsi could beat your limp-wrist arse
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:17 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
He stalled and pushed everything down the road. It’s what he was supposed to do. This massive government bureaucracy we have likes the status quo.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:22 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Never trust a grown man with a goatee.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Really? What was the result of this "prosecution?"
His example is one of actual fraud and he was prosecuted for it.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:43 pm to bstew3006
quote:
You literally spent half the thread downplaying or deflecting from the clear manipulations by Obama-era officials
No
I spent this thread educating y'all why these prosecutions are unlikely to be fruitful
I even explained pages ago how this is specifically not a defense or commentary of the underlying actions
quote:
You can keep saying “I did not,” but when every reply minimizes the abuse of power
The posts don't do this, though.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:44 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
What was the result of this "prosecution?"
More than Will happen against those involved in Russiagate in the memos and discourse from the admin.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:non-responsive. Please try again
More than Will happen
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:50 pm to UncleFestersLegs
If my memory serves he got a felony conviction and probation
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
There was no criminality for him to find.
In fact, the reality is that Russian intelligence, based in St Petersburg did try to influence the 2016 election, primarily online, they wanted to create mistrust and doubt if they couldn’t get the result they wanted.
Tulsi has tried to create a strawman by concluding the Russians didn’t try to affect vote counts registered by machines in some areas. That was never what election interference by the Russians was about and Gabbard knows it…
In fact, the reality is that Russian intelligence, based in St Petersburg did try to influence the 2016 election, primarily online, they wanted to create mistrust and doubt if they couldn’t get the result they wanted.
Tulsi has tried to create a strawman by concluding the Russians didn’t try to affect vote counts registered by machines in some areas. That was never what election interference by the Russians was about and Gabbard knows it…
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No I spent this thread educating y'all why these prosecutions are unlikely to be fruitful I even explained pages ago how this is specifically not a defense or commentary of the underlying actions
At no point have you admitted this behavior deserves prosecution or even condemnation. Instead, you openly called these actions “subjective opinions” and totally ignored the blatant misconduct.
That’s not just minimizing, that’s full-on defending. Don’t pretend otherwise. You’re defending abuse of power by dressing it up as “opinion.”
Stop dodging. Own it.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:oh probation. Wow that's quite a penalty. Did he complete probation? I can see why you're holding him up as your proof of accountability for the frickery around Russiagate. What about the DC Bar? Surely they came down pretty hard on him. Or was there frickery there as well?
If my memory serves he got a felony conviction and probation
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:32 pm to bstew3006
Taibbi laid it out the best. He points out that the “reassessed” intel was being leaked to the press on the same day as the Obama meeting on Dec 9th. So before the new assessment could even be drafted, its conclusions -which were diametrically opposed to the original intelligence- were already smeared all over the Washington post- proving Obama and his inner circle dictated what they wanted the assessment to say. And this meeting wasn’t filled with agents working the case, sussing out the truth… it was 100% top level political appointees. So to suggest the shift was rooted in intelligence is asinine - especially considering there was no underlying intelligence to support it.
And we know it came from the top since idiot Clapper submitted a memo saying that Obama personally asked for the revised assessment.
Here’s the article. Note the date
LINK
And we know it came from the top since idiot Clapper submitted a memo saying that Obama personally asked for the revised assessment.
Here’s the article. Note the date
LINK
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:34 pm to UncleFestersLegs
Clinesmith was sentenced by none other than old Judge Boasberg.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:42 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:I'm sure everything was handled above board. I'm just waiting on the details from SFP. Obviously everything was fine because this is what he referenced SPECIFICALLY regarding all the illegalities in the Russia cover-up.
Clinesmith was sentenced by none other than old Judge Boasberg
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:50 pm to UncleFestersLegs
Follow the timeline.
IC has an assessment that says Russia didn’t influence the election results, likely never tried, and didn’t favor Trump.
Brass finds out, panics, and Clapper pauses the president’s briefing on it.
Obama pulls inner circle in to discuss on Dec 9th 2016 to allegedly task them with taking another look.
That SAME DAY the CIA leaks to the WaPo that the “Russia Worked to Elect Trump”.
#spycraft
IC has an assessment that says Russia didn’t influence the election results, likely never tried, and didn’t favor Trump.
Brass finds out, panics, and Clapper pauses the president’s briefing on it.
Obama pulls inner circle in to discuss on Dec 9th 2016 to allegedly task them with taking another look.
That SAME DAY the CIA leaks to the WaPo that the “Russia Worked to Elect Trump”.
#spycraft
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:52 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:yeah but clinesmith got probation or something so no worries.
That SAME DAY the CIA leaks to the WaPo that the “Russia Worked to Elect Trump
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:53 pm to UncleFestersLegs
Case closed!
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:54 pm to VOR
quote:
Tulsi has tried to create a strawman by concluding the Russians didn’t try to affect vote counts registered by machines in some areas. That was never what election interference by the Russians was about and Gabbard knows it…
the narrative from MSM in 2017 was THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE ELECTION
stop lying
here is a montage you should watch
OMG THE RUSSIANS
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:57 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Case closed!
these lying bitches are getting on my last nerve
bunch of revisionist bastards
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News