- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Brennan, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, & others subpoenaed by fed grand jury
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:30 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:30 pm to hawgfaninc
Tell us treason has no statute of limitations.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:30 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Is pleading the 5th in a grand jury hearing the same as doing so in other settings, from a strategy standpoint?
You choose one of them not named Brennan and give them immunity. And then they have to talk and they are subject to perjury charges if they lie.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:30 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Here we have SFP making no doubts about the fact that he doesn't wish to see justice served.
If the admin is violating the law, having a court rule their actions are illegal is justice being served
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:32 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
You choose one of them not named Brennan and give them immunity. And then they have to talk and they are subject to perjury charges if they lie.
They would have to accept immunity.
Which they may already have. There were rumblings Page was given immunity for her testimony in Congress ages ago.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you really so committed to not being proven wrong for the past 8 years that you want to see this shite stalled out until someone else is in office? Do you have any idea how pathetic that is? And are you now arguing the Trump admin is somehow violating the law by issuing subpoenas over something we were telling you in real time was happening 8 frickin years ago and you were denying?
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which they may already have. There were rumblings Page was given immunity for her testimony in Congress ages ago.
Somebody has accepted immunity. I'm sure the government is not going into this without some basis. Because we know there were evil deeds being done.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:34 pm to BHTiger
quote:
I have little hope based on the location
This isn't DC. It's South Florida.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:35 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Somebody has accepted immunity.
My money is on Page, Clapper & Loretta Lynch.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:35 pm to hawgfaninc
Want to see that smirk on Strzok's during the grand jury.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:38 pm to VoxDawg
I'll be pissed if they gave Clapper and Lynch immunity. Page and even Strozk would be ok to me, as they are underlings. Those other two mother frickers need to fry.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:39 pm to hawgfaninc
Yes! Here we go!
THIS... is what I voted for. (Well partially)
THIS... is what I voted for. (Well partially)
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:43 pm to AlterEd
Lynch has been suspected to have turned stool pigeon, years ago. Don't you think it's odd that she's one of the highest ranking officials from the Obama administration and we haven't heard so much as a sniff from her since Trump's hand hit the Bible in 2017?
HRC was the one soliciting her support in exchange for RBG's SCOTUS seat. If she sings in exchange for immunity, I'm fine with it... so long as it's for bigger names on the list.
HRC was the one soliciting her support in exchange for RBG's SCOTUS seat. If she sings in exchange for immunity, I'm fine with it... so long as it's for bigger names on the list.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:45 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
HRC was the one soliciting her support in exchange for RBG's SCOTUS seat. If she sings in exchange for immunity, I'm fine with it... so long as it's for bigger names on the list.
Somebody has to sing.
Can you imagine that they get away with all of this because they decided "unofficially" in advance they just aren't going to say anything.
This post was edited on 11/7/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:46 pm to hawgfaninc
John Brennan needs to be put against a wall and fricking shot.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:47 pm to grizzlylongcut
Brennan has a date with a Table of Drops number and matching length of rope, to be sure.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:48 pm to hawgfaninc
Dropping this on a Friday night tells me it’s prolly not going to be as big of a deal as we’d hope.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It would be funny if they filed motions to quash the subpoenas based on jurisdiction issues and that litigation took so long the admin ran out of time before the 2028 election, before any testimony was even given.
What's funny is your flippant attitude about Obama, Hillary, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and all the others who committed treason.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:01 pm to Saint Alfonzo
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:03 pm to hawgfaninc
I will NOT get excited until I see them in orange
Which I will think is hilarious… because of the “Orange Man Bad” syndrome.
Which I will think is hilarious… because of the “Orange Man Bad” syndrome.
This post was edited on 11/7/25 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:07 pm to hawgfaninc
The Fed Grand Jury I am waiting on will be in play February 2026 in Florida. Stay away from fans. It is about to get nasty.
This post was edited on 11/7/25 at 8:15 pm
Popular
Back to top



0










