re: Jim and John Respond to Tulsi

quote:

---

Except the Russians sending phishing emails within hours of his statement.

You think Obama and the IC should have just ignored that?

---

Absolutely not. They should have arrested the cause of the whole damn problem to begin with...Hillary Rotham Clinton.

SHE is the one that broke the law. NOT Trump.

quote:

---

boosiebadazz

---

Troll Alert

quote:

---

Well no. We all know Comey also bungled the Clinton email reopening. I’ll grant you that the moment was a little too big for Jim.

---

you just can’t be THIS F*CKING STUPID.

Comey didn’t “reopen” sHitlary's email scandal. There were press reports in early October talking about what she did in those emails. Further, it was clear that she had lied about the nature of the emails. As I recall, it had something to do with the emails they found on Anthony Weiner‘s laptop as a result of his propositioning underage girls.

People were demanding answers right at the end of the campaign. Comey rightfully believed that this could negatively affect Clinton‘s chances of being elected. He therefore lied and faked an investigation to give cover to Hillary. As recent discoveries have proven, he didn’t look at any of the emails. Rather, he just fraudulently lied and said that he had looked at tens of thousands of emails over one weekend. He then lied and said those emails contained “nothing new.“

It was all a scam on the part of Comey to give cover to Hillary. And anyone with an IQ above single f*cking digits would’ve realized this in October 2016. Further, anyone who isn’t a complete f*cking moron would’ve realized this as soon as Comey was exposed in 2017 as being the complete piece of corrupt fricking filth that he is. Since you’re a complete fricking moron (with a single digit IQ) this, of course, excuses you.


If you have any doubt about how completely fricking corrupt and compromise Comey was, just remember that Comey‘s FBI refused to subpoena any of Clinton's or her sycophant's (Brazille, Abedin, etc.) computers. Instead, in a totally unprecedented and almost certainly illegal action, Comey entered into an agreement with Clinton whereby Clinton would turn over all of their computers while Comey agreed to completely destroy the computers once his people had "gone through them." Therefore, Clinton was assured by Comey, that all the evidence would be completely fricking destroyed, and she would have nothing to worry about in the future if Trump won the election. This would have the added benefit of shielding Clinton from the charge of destroying evidence since it was Comey who agreed to destroy the evidence. Much like Hunter's sweet plea deal, no one in the history of law-enforcement had ever seen anything like that. It was a complete f*cking scam from the very f*cking beginning.

quote:

---

I’m a straight shooter Boosie.

I want allow you to be misrepresented by tier 3 types looking to make a name for themselves.

We can disagree without making things up

---

You’re a gentleman and (sometimes) a scholar.

Her penalty was $8,000. Just an absolute disgrace.

quote:

---

Federal election regulators fined Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee earlier this month for not properly disclosing the money they spent on controversial opposition research that led to the infamous Trump-Russia dossier.

The DNC was fined $105,000 and the Clinton campaign was fined $8,000, according to a letter sent by the Federal Election Commission to a conservative group that requested an inquiry.

---

LINK

You’re outraged because The Orange Man drop kicks Dem butts on a daily basis.

quote:

---

The scandal is that he asked them to fabricate Russian interference after the assessment came back as none

---

That not accurate at all, though.

The first assessment came back no hacking of election infrastructure.

The soft influence stuff is well-documented and not really in dispute. That’s the assessment that was part of the subsequent statement.

Get back on your meds.

quote:

---

The soft influence stuff is well-documented and not really in dispute. That’s the assessment that was part of the subsequent statement.

---

We acknowledge there was “Boris likes this” posts on Facebook.

What does that have to do with the Trump campaign and Russia hacking into the Gov’t server to the third highest office in the executive branch?

You are seriously trying to equate likes on Facebook to hacking into the Secretary of State’s emails?

quote:

---

On July 27, 2016, Trump asked the Russians to find the emails. They complied:

---

And then he went on to call Nazis “very fine people“, correct?

Ho Lee fuk!