Started By
Message

re: JD Vance says US will "WALK AWAY" if Russia and Ukraine don't come to a ceasefire deal

Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35782 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

But if Zelensky keeps holding out, then at some point we have to say “frick it, we tried but this dipshit is hell bent on digging his own grave”.

Its none of our business, but I have always found it odd to paint his/Ukraine's position as unfathomably unreasonable.

There really isn't a country on earth that wouldn't feel the same way that the Ukrainians do vis-a-vis the terms of ending the conflict.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9787 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 3:03 pm to
These are your words:

quote:

We do not need to be involved in that conflict, and any support of our involvement into that conflict should be viewed as support for sending other US citizens into a war zone.


"Any support"

Support could be food, medicine, money, arms, hookers and blow... Who knows. You're the one making blanket statements.

quote:

It’s a green light for Russia to do what they please. If Putin chooses peace he’ll get it. If he chooses to continue the war he’ll do that and get more territory.


Its factual. Inconvenient for you but factual. He won't stop until he decides his goals are achieved knowing that Ukraine cannot defeat him. However far reaching that is is a question only he can answer.

quote:

If we aren't involved


So we are involved? Cool. I guess Trump wants what I quoted you on. Take it up with him.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62798 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

"Any support"

Support could be food, medicine, money, arms, hookers and blow... Who knows. You're the one making blanket statements.


All of these involve US citizens being there.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9787 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

All of these involve US citizens being there.


You're the one that said "any support" means sending our sons and daughters to die over there not me.. I pointed out how that was dumb and gave you examples of types of support. You're free to go back and edit if you'd like. Or double down on being dumb. It's your call. I don't care what you do. But it's funny and I thank you for that. One last thing... we'd have to transport most of those good over there. Which means US citizens being there.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52393 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

I think that’s kind of the point.

You think the point is to give Russia, the whip hand in negotiations?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112637 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

If he chooses to continue the war he’ll do that and get more territory
Whats the logical way this plays out without Russia getting more territory?

I'm not seeing it.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9787 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Whats the logical way this plays out without Russia getting more territory?


The only way it happens is if Putin desires and demands an immediate peace and Ukraine accepts it. But Putin, being in the driver’s seat of this war, has to offer it. That’s it without the West truly getting involved. Supplies are one thing, boots on the ground are another. The people applauding us “walking away” have to hope that Putin wants that. They’re putting faith into Putin to negotiate in good faith and have no additional ambition to conquer more territory. Make of that whatever you will but that’s what they’re doing. Maybe they’re right and the war ends and life goes on. But if he doesn’t you have a larger humanitarian crisis from the Ukrainian lands being taken over, refugees and everything that comes with that and of course more death on all sides. Russia will have greater control over Ukrainian crops and REEs (rare earth elements).
Posted by OU Sooners
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Aug 2021
34 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:39 pm to
We should walk away now...we have enough problems at home to try and fix some eastern European issue.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48895 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:40 pm to
Should have walked away the day Trump took office.
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
14800 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:46 pm to
LSU Russian big mad over this
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
40707 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

LSU Russian big mad over this


Putin stole his gal when he worked in Russia. Never gotten over it
Posted by threeputtforbogie
Addison, TX
Member since Sep 2017
976 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

It’s a green light for Russia to do what they please. If Putin chooses peace he’ll get it. If he chooses to continue the war he’ll do that and get more territory.


That’s been the status quo for a while now.
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
1185 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 5:55 pm to
Finally.

This is pressure on Ukraine to propose something that Russia will actually take.

If they don't, Russia will take 100% of Ukraine.

I am fine either way.
Posted by BluegrassCardinal
Kentucky
Member since Nov 2022
1747 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 6:01 pm to
The thought among types that include John Mearsheimer is that Russia will stop at the Dnieper and Odessa could be occupied
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22788 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

You think the point is to give Russia, the whip hand in negotiations?


I think the point is the pressure mentioned previously provides this as the alternative.

Trump admin is ready for Zelensky to play ball.
Posted by LSUDUCKMAN67
DTB
Member since Sep 2020
1578 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 8:48 pm to
Good, time for us to walk away.

The deal was that Ukraine would never become a part of NATO. Sleepy Joe and the Actor kept poking the bear knowing what they were doing. Putin felt threatened and went in. Israel does the same. They poke the bear and make it look like there the good guys when in fact there not.

You cant say if another Cuban missile crisis were to happen the US wouldn’t invade Cuba. The US would be doing the same! They would invade anywhere and anyone they felt threatened by. Especially if someone was putting Nukes in our backyard.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
5246 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 9:39 pm to
Russia started the war, and I sympathize with Ukraine to a degree. Its very hard to root for them when they have Zelensky in charge, be it interfering in our elections by campaigning for Biden, disrespecting POTUS in the Oval office, and how he clearly does not want the war to end

This tweet from him below is unfathomably unreasonable. He is trying to make POTUS look bad for sticking up for them in his first term. They have not controlled Crimea in over a decade. Their manpower is shot, they lost control of their black sea territories, and they are losing ground every day. If there will be no peace without Crimea being Ukrainian, then there will be no peace, and eventually there will be no Ukraine

Little Z is out of his mind and hundreds of thousands more will die because of it


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 4/23/25 at 9:40 pm
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66919 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 8:08 am to
I'm just catching up on this. What a cluster.
quote:

Setback For U.S. 'Ceasefire' Deal In Ukraine
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, several foreign ministers from Europe and the Ukrainian President Zelenski were supposed to meet in London today.

The Trump administration had planned this to be a final meeting over a ceasefire in Ukraine. A U.S. proposal for the ceasefire were to be discussed and accepted.

But Zelenski bailed out and the proposed meeting fell apart. According to the Independent Zelenski had feared to be "ambushed":

quote:

Other media are vague about the reasons to downgrade the talks. There is generally no common line in the media reporting of the issue. Axios claims that Ukraine rejected to negotiate a longer term ceasefire and instead only offered a shorter term:

quote:

The U.S. ceasefire plan includes several points which either the Ukrainians, the Europeans or the Russians were certain to reject.


quote:

Zelenski does not want to concede any territory. He also does not want to sign the mineral deal which would eliminate all sovereign decisions abut Ukraine's resources. A longer war, during which billions of dollars and Euros keep flowing, is the best deal for him.

At least some Europeans still want to 'win' against Russia. They reject any lifting of sanctions. They want to insert 'peacekeepers' into Ukraine but only with U.S. backing.

Russia wants a bigger deal, not just a ceasefire in Ukraine, but a new European security architecture.

Claims by the Financial Times that Russia is willing to stop the war and to give up on its larger aims of demilitarizing and denazification of Ukraine have been rejected by Moscow. Russia will also not give up control of the nuclear power station in Zaporizhzhia.

The U.S. acceptance of Crimea as Russian territory is an interesting point but likely based on an ulterior motive. It would lift sanctions on Crimea and allow U.S. companies to take part in the exploitation of natural gas fields around it.

There is little the U.S. can do for now to press for a compromise. The best and most likely move is for Trump to wash his hands over Ukraine and walk away.

This would fit the larger plan of leaving the struggle with Russia to the Europeans while the U.S. will concentrate its forces in Asia for a potential conflict with China.

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram