- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:36 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
the vice president of the united state's thanksgiving party was all indians. that is wrong and you are a weak person if you take issue with someone pointing out how absurd that is
All Indians...
Yeah, bro. He married an Indian woman who still has her family and their half Indian children. JD's immediate family he grew up with is pretty much dead. This is a really ignorant and actually racist take. Not just liberal "racist" where it's racist simply for disagreeing on policy or pointing out statistics or something... but actual racism and ignorance. Nick Fuentes is a little shite talking beta bitch. Dude couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag. One day his shite talking is going to get his bitch arse knocked the frick out. Can't wait for that.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:36 am to LARancher1991
quote:i wouldn't vote for him. jd vance's mentor is actually into dudes fwiw
No he's just terrified of poon. Real manly guy you support there. I bet he secretly is into dudes.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:45 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Nick Fuentes is a IC plant
He's just your basic twink who resonates with young men who have daddy issues.
Wants to be famous and spits garbage to garbage receptacles.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:45 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
This is a really ignorant and actually racist take. Not just liberal "racist" where it's racist simply for disagreeing on policy or pointing out statistics or something... but actual racism and ignorance.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:47 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Lets see one is a former marine with an actual family and the other thinks girls are icky. Not surprised to see which one you are simping for

Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:50 am to LARancher1991
The reality is that our options will be:
Rubio - Won't run if Vance does so probably moot. Probably an effective leader/manager. Good enough ideologically. But lots of traditional GOP (deep state, if you will) ties.
DeSantis - Elite manager. Strong ideologically. One of the few state leaders to start talking about how far conservatives should go in attracting business/transplants who will not uphold the state's values. But I don't think he's well positioned to challenge this time, and if he did, he'd have to take on a ton of bad (ie, GOPe) baggage to do it.
Vance - Perhaps the weakest managerial resume. Unclear leadership abilities. Extremely in the weeds on the new, postlib, nationalistic/semi-blood/soil right. Obviously that's countered (for some) by marrying an Indian woman who isn't a Christian convert.
Rubio - Won't run if Vance does so probably moot. Probably an effective leader/manager. Good enough ideologically. But lots of traditional GOP (deep state, if you will) ties.
DeSantis - Elite manager. Strong ideologically. One of the few state leaders to start talking about how far conservatives should go in attracting business/transplants who will not uphold the state's values. But I don't think he's well positioned to challenge this time, and if he did, he'd have to take on a ton of bad (ie, GOPe) baggage to do it.
Vance - Perhaps the weakest managerial resume. Unclear leadership abilities. Extremely in the weeds on the new, postlib, nationalistic/semi-blood/soil right. Obviously that's countered (for some) by marrying an Indian woman who isn't a Christian convert.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:56 am to LARancher1991
quote:i'm not simping for anyone, unlike you
Lets see one is a former marine with an actual family and the other thinks girls are icky. Not surprised to see which one you are simping for
i'm attacking JD Vance because he's a manufactured fraud. NF just happens to be the only public figure who will say the quiet part out loud
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:59 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I think it's fair game to look at whether he is a tech bro stooge/Manchurian candidate LARPing as MAGA.
Bullseye. He came out of no where to be VP, attached conveniently to the billionaire hip of Peter (anti-Christ) Thiel.
Even this "Hey, look at me hangin' with Navy Seals!" production is like a theatrical hype trailer. And then there are his CK/EK TPUSA featurette performance and recent profane "eat sh*t" tough guy comment to intel-asset provocateur Fuentes.
Everything in DC continues to be a replacement for Hollywood show-biz as JD continues to build his image.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:59 am to GreatLakesTiger24
But your ghey cult leader is also manufactured ans controlled
Its weird how you simp so hard for him and his spongebob body
Its weird how you simp so hard for him and his spongebob body
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:00 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
i'm attacking JD Vance because he's a manufactured fraud. NF just happens to be the only public figure who will say the quiet part out loud
understandable since you voted for kamala,
frankly boy i'm done with the blank profiles, you don't live anywhere and you have no occupation fill out your profile and we can talk.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 10:15 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:00 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
i'm attacking JD Vance because he's a manufactured fraud.
So is everyone who will be on the ticket in 2028.
So is NF.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 10:02 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:02 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
JD Vance actually has handlers (gay and Jewish). NF does not
You're half right.
But NF not "having handlers"?? Dude, he's an obvious asset. His role is provocateur.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:03 am to RogerTheShrubber
Sure, but Vance is getting credited as this based, return to tradition nationalist and it’s all clearly such bullshite, much like Obama being hope and change.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:04 am to rmc
quote:
His mentor is Peter Thiel. I mean, you could argue the guy is the enabler of the deep state.
Logical conclusion.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:05 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Sure, but Vance is getting credited as this based, return to tradition nationalist
Its certainly a better position stance to take than being some grifter terrified of women and anyone who doesnt look like an urban twink.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:09 am to RoyalWe
quote:
If it's not racist, then explain it to me. How else should this be taken?
He's not trying to say it's not racist. People like NF and his acolytes like SirWinston wear being racist as a badge of honor. He's jokingly telling you it's not the insult to him that it should be. They embrace it.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:10 am to SirWinston
If you want to see leftism succeed more in America, elevating figures like NF is the way to do it.
He is the right’s version of hateful identity politics. He is as small in mind as he is in stature.
He is the right’s version of hateful identity politics. He is as small in mind as he is in stature.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:13 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Its unfortunate to have that ghey groyper Fuentes trying to divide the Rs and trying to have the youth hate JD l. His handlers are having him go extra hard
Cause JD is a funny arse dude and will be a great prez
It's legitimately unbelievable to me that anybody listens to Nick Fuentes in any way. How can anyone, knowing what this dude is like, listen to him with any reverence or agreement whatsoever?
If you want a GOP that is unelectable fringe-lunatic, then you found your guy. Be better than that. It's really not that hard.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:13 am to SirWinston
quote:
What NF says about JD Vance is true, like it or not.
Your slanders about NF are false, like it or not.
You cannot plausibly verify these assertions. But you're stating them as irrefutable gospel when, in fact, they are opinion.
This is counterproductive to dynamic and robust civil discourse.
If you agree with what JD says and disagree with what Fuentes says, or vice versa, that's fine. That's everyone's right. But its erroneous to frame either argument as unambiguous palpability.
Popular
Back to top


0








