- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith Court Filing-If Trump reelected, will incite to murder Democrat politicians
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:26 pm to Godfather1
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:26 pm to Godfather1
quote:
This reeks of desperation.
Naw.
This clip clearly doesn't show the full argument, but I'll bet 5 SFP bucks this is just the logical extremes of permitting the version of immunity that Trump is arguing for. This is standard, both online and in legal arguments.
If x is permitted, then y will become legal.
You show how y can (not will) be very extreme, which would be an absurd result.
2
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
So you read "opposing lawmakers" to mean not just Democrats?
Please, elaborate, if you could.
Please, elaborate, if you could.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:29 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
So you read "opposing lawmakers" to mean not just Democrats?
No. "Will" is almost assuredly used dishonestly to create emotional reaction.
I imagine "can" is going to be the correct word to use.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:29 pm to Ribbed
quote:
projecting
This. He is hoping some LGBTQIAX+ will kill Trump.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:29 pm to cajunangelle
Not only do they lie and live “by any means necessary”, but they are spectacular drama queens.
The very worst humanity has to offer: Today’s “progressive” Democrats.
The very worst humanity has to offer: Today’s “progressive” Democrats.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:29 pm to cajunangelle
There is no penalty for making these ridiculous assertions.
Could?
FFS
He could sign an EO banning growing daisies.
He could incite people to only buy from Target.
He could this. He could that.
Ridiculous.
Could?
FFS
He could sign an EO banning growing daisies.
He could incite people to only buy from Target.
He could this. He could that.
Ridiculous.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:32 pm to roadGator
.......and here is SFP to frick up another thread.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:33 pm to TDTOM
quote:
.......and here is SFP to frick up another thread.
Are you worried you're going to have to eat the biscuit?
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
depends if its an English tea biscuit or grannies biscuits.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:35 pm to cajunangelle
Like the Clintons?
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're expecting the audience of this news network to distinguish between such legal nuance?
The same network (same host, I believe) who flatly declared that the J6ers brought a legit functioning full scale gallows to execute VP Pence, when in fact, it was just a scaled down prop, meant to convey outrage at the stolen election, but could never have been used to execute anyone larger than a Hobbit?
Goodness.
The same network (same host, I believe) who flatly declared that the J6ers brought a legit functioning full scale gallows to execute VP Pence, when in fact, it was just a scaled down prop, meant to convey outrage at the stolen election, but could never have been used to execute anyone larger than a Hobbit?
Goodness.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:39 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Ray Ray Retard
As the father of a special needs child, that is very offensive.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you worried you're going to have to eat the biscuit?
No. I am just tired of you coming into threads to argue just for the sake of arguing.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:39 pm to cajunangelle
Facts not in evidence
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:40 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You're expecting the audience of this news network to distinguish between such legal nuance?
That's what I am here for, to do just that.
quote:
The same network (same host, I believe) who flatly declared that the J6ers brought a legit functioning full scale gallows to execute VP Pence, when in fact, it was just a scaled down prop, meant to convey outrage at the stolen election, but could never have been used to execute anyone larger than a Hobbit?
Nobody is discussing Ari Melber ITT
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:42 pm to TDTOM
quote:
I am just tired of you coming into threads to argue just for the sake of arguing.
Well it's a good thing that I'm not doing that.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:45 pm to cajunangelle
With language like that Smith is suggesting that some woke dem will need to act in self-defense...
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'll bet 5 SFP bucks this is just the logical extremes of permitting the version of immunity that Trump is arguing for. This is standard, both online and in legal arguments.
If x is permitted, then y will become legal.
You show how y can (not will) be very extreme, which would be an absurd result.
I read the brief and confirmed this is exactly what he was doing, along with other examples (accepting a bribe in exchange for a lucrative government contract, instructing the FBI director to plant incriminating evidence on a political enemy, ordering the National Guard to murder her most prominent critics, selling nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary).
The specific example in the tweet is actually even specifically refined to impeachments, to show that the "impeachment" standard Trump's attorneys are arguing for are inadequate.
These are all examples to show how extreme/absurd the position Trump's attorney argue re: Presidential immunity.
Nobody is arguing Trump "will" do any of this stuff.
Read pages 27-29 of the brief.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 1/5/24 at 2:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nobody is discussing Ari Melber
This guy?
Jack Poso - Twitter post.
Seems someone is talking about him.
quote:
That's what I am here for, to do just that.
And that's not remotely the point. I asked if you thought the AUDIENCE of MSNBC was smart enough to distinguish the nuance.
Because it seems all MSNBC does is lie.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 2:50 pm
Page 2 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News