Started By
Message

re: ISIS gunmen take 20 hostages in Sydney Cafe

Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:17 pm to
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
37791 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:17 pm to
Apparently it's not ISIS, but a different terror group, and it may only be one man.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Our "guns" keep the coward muslims from trying that out here, there would be hell to pay if they tried this out in large scale.




You're not the brightest of posters are you.

Our "guns" can't even keep the whack jobs from murdering people en mass in colleges, movie theaters or elementary schools.

Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84462 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:20 pm to
Well lets round them all up.
Posted by Reubaltaich
A nation under duress
Member since Jun 2006
5348 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:21 pm to
The Aussie's gave up their guns about 15 years ago. Betcha they wish they had them back now.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73172 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

asurob1
20 innocent anglo saxons are on the verge of being executed by sand devils, and you are on here bitching about american gun owners.

Go frick yourself, you bitch. Way to stand in solidarity with your anglo-saxon brethren down under.

Eat shite.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84488 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:22 pm to
I'd also argue the ISLAMIC(!!!!!) extremists want to provoke the narrative of it being a religious war between Christians and Muslims as it is a great recruiting tool. Using that logic, they would absolutely love to have a mass shooting on American soil and trigger the massacre of Muslims here that 91TIGER has so wisely advised us would happen.

Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
19267 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:23 pm to
On a large scale dumbass. But to show you how damn stupid you are if there were armed security at schools, concealed carry, and laxed gun laws, there would be less of this type of isolated shooting. Most of this stuff happens in "gun free zones".
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
37791 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:24 pm to
quote:


Our "guns" can't even keep the whack jobs from murdering people en mass in colleges, movie theaters or elementary schools.


No civilians possessed guns at any of those locations, which belies your point.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84488 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:24 pm to
you're such an interesting poster. You post some sophomoric pseudo-intellectual economic theories with all the buzzwords and then you have posts like this one and it seems kind of trollish with the Angle-saxon nonsense but then again I'm in bizarro land here on the Poli Talk so I can't quite be so sure.

Regardless, you're rocketing up my power rankings of posters whose posts I always have to read.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

20 innocent anglo saxons are on the verge of being executed by sand devils, and you are on here bitching about american gun owners.

Go frick yourself, you bitch. Way to stand in solidarity with your anglo-saxon brethren down under.

Eat shite.


Wow what a racist shout out. Or did you assume that all the hostages were white guys.

Fact is, our gun laws have made mass killings easier for whack jobs...not harder.

But keep pretending.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

On a large scale dumbass. But to show you how damn stupid you are if there were armed security at schools, concealed carry, and laxed gun laws, there would be less of this type of isolated shooting. Most of this stuff happens in "gun free zones".


sure there would...sure there would...then nuts would never show up at airports and pop TSA officers...or malls where there are armed police and kill them.

Our laws make it easier...but hey...keep telling yourself the opposite.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:28 pm to
quote:



No civilians possessed guns at any of those locations, which belies your point.


I seem to recall at each of these...locations...at least one did...

Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84462 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Fact is, our gun laws have made mass killings easier for whack jobs...not harder.


Armed people protect themselves, are you suggesting they should give up that right?
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

you're such an interesting poster. You post some sophomoric pseudo-intellectual economic theories with all the buzzwords and then you have posts like this one and it seems kind of trollish with the Angle-saxon nonsense but then again I'm in bizarro land here on the Poli Talk so I can't quite be so sure.

Regardless, you're rocketing up my power rankings of posters whose posts I always have to read.


He is entertaining...

But remember he always votes republican no matter what that person actually stands for
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
37791 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:30 pm to
quote:



I seem to recall at each of these...locations...at least one did...



non sequitur.. the argument was that if law abiding citizens at those locations were armed, they could have prevented those incidents.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:31 pm to
Why the frick is this not on CNN.com yet?!?
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Armed people protect themselves, are you suggesting they should give up that right?


You mean like these two citizens?

Or the 3rd guy who was packing and decide to try to intervene only to be gunned down too.

That'll teach him.
This post was edited on 12/14/14 at 6:33 pm
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

non sequitur.. the argument was that if law abiding citizens at those locations were armed, they could have prevented those incidents.


no but keep believing that...because the NRA tells you it's true.
Posted by Reubaltaich
A nation under duress
Member since Jun 2006
5348 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:33 pm to
Hey, a .357 slug to the forehead works everytime on a terrorist.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/14/14 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Our "guns" can't even keep the whack jobs from murdering people en mass in colleges, movie theaters or elementary schools.




Once again, your anti-gun bias is coming through so hard that you really didn't think about this sentence before posting it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram