Started By
Message

re: Is there a worse form of government than democracy?

Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295707 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:42 pm to
quote:


Meh. I'd rather have the ability to vote in or out my government representatives, rather than have some person ruling over everything and everyone just because he/she was the son/daughter of the previous king.


We let the federal govt get too large and "democracy" cannot control it under one govt and two parties.

340 million people arent going to willingly comply with one govt and two parites. Its time for a split.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3710 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

[Atheists] lack values

Wrong.

I know many atheists who strongly believe that slavery is morally wrong. Curiously, Christianity has changed it's opinion on the morality of slavery. How could that be if Christian morality is based on godliness, and thus is unchanging?
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21241 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:


340 million people arent going to willingly comply with one govt and two parites. Its time for a split


Probably a better idea would be a third-party.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295707 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:


I know many atheists who strongly believe that slavery is morally wrong


Why do they believe this?

If they were born in a place where it was prevalent and it benefitted them, I imagine they would accept it as they have nothing to build a value system upon.

I loathe religion but dont discount the idea that there is a God and we should treat others how we want to be treated based on the perfect ideal.

I'm not looking for heavenly rewards, but internal peace that comes from being in tune with the divine.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465753 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Probably a better idea would be a third-party.

Then we need a different form of democracy, more similar to the European Parliament model (which has enraged MAGA the past few years, mind you)
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26893 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Wrong. It's not all about me.


Who tells you what right and wrong is if it's not you?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295707 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:50 pm to
Without a third or fourth party, our system is a sham.

We are the most diverse nation in the world but limited by one massive federal govt that isnt responsive to any of us.

It needs to be broken down.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10448 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

It's your premise, the burden of proof is on you.


That's what I thought.

I can't prove that something doesn't exist, genius. Nor is that even how the conversation went.

I basically said this: "It's obvious that if human beings deny that there is any sort of objective moral standard apart from and above themselves, any morality that they claim can only be subjective, either individual or collective preferences."

You said, "That's wrong. You are in error."

So YOU made the claim that my statement was wrong. The burden of proof is on you. According to your own post.

So I will wait with baited breath to discover how that statement can possibly be wrong. At least until the squirrel troll who purports to not believe in God but actually hates Him gets here.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28096 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:50 pm to
In the short term a good and wise king is better but no matter how good and wise your king, the bad king is coming. And there's no nice way to get rid of him. In the longterm the Republic is by far the best
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295707 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

European Parliament model


I took a Euro Govt class for grins, and ended up loving it. There are definitively some things we can take from them and utilize, like the confidence vote.

But even my prof, an old Labour Party shill agreed that Euro style politics will not play well here.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10448 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

It's not all about me.



Nobody said your values were selfish.

That's not what anyone is saying.

What we're (correctly) pointing out is that you have no basis for them other than that you personally like them. You may naturally be empathetic, or you may get a boost of self-esteem from a virtue-signaling standpoint—there could be all sorts of reasons why you think your values are worth embracing—but where the rubber meets the road is when you bump up against someone who has different values.

The only authority to whom you can appeal in that case is yourself.

If you try to convince Joseph Stalin that being fair and just is better than being homicidal and cruel and he says, "Nah, you're wrong, might makes right" and to every objection you give he says, "So what?" then who are you to say that he's wrong and you're right?

There is no authority to appeal to in your world.

He's got his opinion and you have yours. What gives you the right to tell him his values are wrong?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram