- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a nation on Earth not ruled by conquerors?
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:07 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:07 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Yeah, because the Japanese didn't rape and murder their way across the Asian continent or anything. Or the Mongols
Those were other Asian ethnic groups they were conquering, stupid.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:14 pm to red racker
quote:
Those were other Asian ethnic groups they were conquering, stupid.
First off the Mongols certainly killed off other ethnic groups besides "Asians" for lack of a better term.
Secondly, the Japanese sure as shite didn't think they were the same race as the Chinese. They saw them even lower than the Nazis saw the Jews. They looked at them as nothing more than animals that should be slaughtered because they can do it.
And you don't know dick about Asia to put them all under one ethnic group. Look at this and then tell me that there wouldn't be a lot of ethnic group diversity within that circle. You might as well put all humans in one ethnic group if you're going down that dumb path.

Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:25 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Secondly, the Japanese sure as shite didn't think they were the same race as the Chinese. They saw them even lower than the Nazis saw the Jews. They looked at them as nothing more than animals that should be slaughtered because they can do it.
Doesn't matter what the Japanese or Chinese thought about one another, they are from the same sphere of influence and share much of the same Mongol haplogroup DNA sequences to a great degree (with the exception of the Ainu of Japan).
Nationality is much different than ethnicity, which is biological. Most of that occurred long before the Human Genome Project was even started.
Yes, the Mongols did have a minor presence in Eastern Europe, and many Slavs today have Mongol ancestry, but Europe and Asia are part of the same Eurasian landmass.
Whites, on the other hand, went overseas to colonize and exterminate people from well beyond their sphere of influence. You cannot still believe that you're going to be able to white wash history these days and get away with it. There is no way to sugar coat white Mississippians' resistance to Lyndon Johnson's Civil Rights Act of 1964, or what the southern whites did to the Five Civilized Tribes at the time of Andrew Jackson, for instance.
The day of reckoning is here, and you will either conform and mix out, or else your population will become so small and consanguineous that the effects of incest will deteriorate what little is left of the remaining white population. Also, whites are going to have to mix to survive the increasing UVA and UVB intensity from now on, since the ozone layer isn't going to replenish itself.
Good luck finding employment outside of the military once whites become the minority in Dixie, since you have burned too many bridges.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:28 pm to red racker
quote:
The day of reckoning is here, and you will either conform and mix out, or else your population will become so small and consanguineous that the effects of incest will deteriorate what little is left of the remaining white population. Also, whites are going to have to mix to survive the increasing UVA and UVB intensity from now on, since the ozone layer isn't going to replenish itself.
quote:
red racker
quote:
251 posts
Hmm. Found the problem here.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:29 pm to red racker
quote:
Good luck finding employment outside of the military once whites become the minority in Dixie, since you have burned too many bridges.
Wow, you are a fricking racist moron.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:30 pm to red racker
quote:
The day of reckoning is here, and you will either conform and mix out, or else your population will become so small and consanguineous that the effects of incest will deteriorate what little is left of the remaining white population. Also, whites are going to have to mix to survive the increasing UVA and UVB intensity from now on, since the ozone layer isn't going to replenish itself.
Good luck finding employment outside of the military once whites become the minority in Dixie, since you have burned too many bridges.

Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:33 pm to red racker
On a serious note, great to see you guys got internet out on the rez.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:37 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Wow, you are a fricking racist moron
No, not really. It is easy to read the writing on the wall and get the gist of it all.
Whites are down to 8% of the planet's population, and at least 60% of that 8% is no longer in favor of being white anymore, which means the remaining white conservative population that wants to remain white will be bottlenecked and consanguineous. To remain a white conservative will eventually lead to autosomal recessive disorders and retardation, since the availability of white females is almost non-existent these days, and the southern ones that are conservative are probably southern and therefore leftovers that descended from whatever didn't get killed off by Sherman's army.
Seriously, whites from the south are probably in their last generation. It will not be pretty if you decide to remain "pure" like many in your region are advocating. Texas and Florida have made the adjustment, so the rest in between will either submit to multiculturalism or else seize to exist due to rare medical conditions caused by consanguinity.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:40 pm to red racker
I agree that Iceland is the best example. The Scandinavian countries have also seen minimal military invasions, although there have been migrations since at least the neolithic from continental Europe that have shaped the culture there over the millennia.
Pretty much all of East Asia got conquered at one time or another. China, Japan, Korea, etc. were conquered and/or settled by the Mongoloid peoples who dispersed and/or killed the humans already there. Japan itself had an ancient aboriginal people living on the island known as the Ainu until the Korean mongols came and conquered them. (I am using "Mongol" in a taxonomic sense -- that's what anthropologists call them. I am not referring to the country of Mongolia). The Mongoloid people probably originated somewhere in ancient South Asia, moved north to Siberia and finally east into Asia proper where they wiped out the natives.
South Asia has seen numerous invasions even in historic times from the north (Aryans in 1500 BC and then the British in more recent times).
And the Middle-East, well, we all know the story there. That whole region has been one big battlefield since the Persians, if not prior.
And Central Asia has seen lots of invasions since the bronze age. Scythians, Mongols, Turks, etc. That region has been almost as contentious as the Middle East (though less so today).
Continental Europe was conquered by the Indo-Europeans in the bronze age. They pretty much slaughtered every man and took all the women (this is proven with DNA). They eventually made it to Greece (Hellenes and Dorians) and merged with the people already there (Minoans and Ionians). This merger of cultures between the militaristic and nomadic Indo-Europeans and the more sedentary and refined Minoan/Ionian cultures gave us western civ as we know it.
Pretty much all of East Asia got conquered at one time or another. China, Japan, Korea, etc. were conquered and/or settled by the Mongoloid peoples who dispersed and/or killed the humans already there. Japan itself had an ancient aboriginal people living on the island known as the Ainu until the Korean mongols came and conquered them. (I am using "Mongol" in a taxonomic sense -- that's what anthropologists call them. I am not referring to the country of Mongolia). The Mongoloid people probably originated somewhere in ancient South Asia, moved north to Siberia and finally east into Asia proper where they wiped out the natives.
South Asia has seen numerous invasions even in historic times from the north (Aryans in 1500 BC and then the British in more recent times).
And the Middle-East, well, we all know the story there. That whole region has been one big battlefield since the Persians, if not prior.
And Central Asia has seen lots of invasions since the bronze age. Scythians, Mongols, Turks, etc. That region has been almost as contentious as the Middle East (though less so today).
Continental Europe was conquered by the Indo-Europeans in the bronze age. They pretty much slaughtered every man and took all the women (this is proven with DNA). They eventually made it to Greece (Hellenes and Dorians) and merged with the people already there (Minoans and Ionians). This merger of cultures between the militaristic and nomadic Indo-Europeans and the more sedentary and refined Minoan/Ionian cultures gave us western civ as we know it.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:50 pm to red racker
quote:
seize to exist due to rare medical conditions caused by consanguinity.
Hasn't killed of the American Indians yet and they have to be inbred since they are so few of them left after the white man got through with them.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:52 pm to northalabamacracker
quote:
Hasn't killed of the American Indians yet and they have to be inbred since they are so few of them left after the white man got through with them.
It's a bunch of bullshite. Archaeologists estimate the the total number of people in Europe after the Ice Age (which killed many off) was about 4,000.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 12:04 am to red racker
quote:
No, not really. It is easy to read the writing on the wall and get the gist of it all.
Whites are down to 8% of the planet's population, and at least 60% of that 8% is no longer in favor of being white anymore, which means the remaining white conservative population that wants to remain white will be bottlenecked and consanguineous. To remain a white conservative will eventually lead to autosomal recessive disorders and retardation, since the availability of white females is almost non-existent these days, and the southern ones that are conservative are probably southern and therefore leftovers that descended from whatever didn't get killed off by Sherman's army.
Seriously, whites from the south are probably in their last generation. It will not be pretty if you decide to remain "pure" like many in your region are advocating. Texas and Florida have made the adjustment, so the rest in between will either submit to multiculturalism or else seize to exist due to rare medical conditions caused by consanguinity.
Yeah, if you're obsessed with your race surviving, then chances are you're a racist. Honestly we need to stop caring about race at large. I actively want an Asian or Jewish wife, so frick you and your racist bullshite of trying to separate people.
And really, the avaliability of white women is non-existent these days, when they compose of 35% of the country? Are you fricking high? I really haven't gone out on a date with a non-white female in well over a year, and it's not for lack of trying.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 2:33 am to Bjorn Cyborg
Ethiopia. It was never colonized except for a brief period of Italian occupation during WWII
Posted on 2/12/17 at 3:37 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Red Rifle's post might be the dumbest of the year so far.
Agreed, and that's quite a feat.
I be he felt good after typing all that too.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 7:38 am to northalabamacracker
quote:
Hasn't killed of the American Indians yet and they have to be inbred since they are so few of them left after the white man got through with them.
American Indians have always been mixed Turko-Mongol and Caucasoid long before arriving on the North American land mass. Also, the white Anglo-Saxons didn't physically slaughter quite as much as the Spanish. Whites have inferior recessive genes that die off when mixed, so it doesn't look to good for you.
On the other hand, Natives and other ethnic groups are rising and thriving now. The universities and the scholarships are paying off well for non-white communities, and a lot of white people have given up (e.g., higher rates of prescription drug abuse and suicide) because they see the writing on the wall.
Trump came too late to rescue the whites.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 8:41 am to red racker
This dude is trying to out-crazy goldenugget.
Doing a great job so far too.
Doing a great job so far too.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 9:21 am to red racker
quote:
Also, the white Anglo-Saxons didn't physically slaughter quite as much as the Spanish.
Still white and slaughtered millions of American Indians.
quote:
lot of white people have given up (e.g., higher rates of prescription drug abuse and suicide)
American Indians have literally the highest of both in the USA
Posted on 2/12/17 at 9:27 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I'm the best ever. I'm the most brutal and vicious, the most ruthless champion there has ever been. No one can stop me. Lennox is a conqueror? No! I'm Alexander! He's no Alexander! I'm the best ever. There's never been anyone as ruthless as me. I'm Sonny Liston. I'm Jack Dempsey. There's no one like me. I'm from their cloth. There is no one who can match me. My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable, and I'm just ferocious. I want his heart! I want to eat his children! Praise be to Allah!
Posted on 2/12/17 at 9:38 am to Bjorn Cyborg
the original inhabitants of the Americas
but of course they eventually got around to warring with each other
and then the high-tech, disease ridden euros showed up
but of course they eventually got around to warring with each other
and then the high-tech, disease ridden euros showed up
Popular
Back to top


2





