Started By
Message

re: Is the Russian Army Really Failing?

Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:14 pm to
Posted by Pechon
unperson
Member since Oct 2011
7748 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:14 pm to
The CCP taking advantage of a situation?



You don't say!
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
50950 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

This isn't even the beginning of the army.

Russian army once defeated Hitler in great Patriotic war. Now Russian Army is Hitler.
Imagine being a Russian soldier and in the last few days learning that your pay as a soldier is worth about one-quarter of what it was before the war. Your family is getting nothing. Your country is being isolated. Your leader is in a serious mental condition. Do you keep fighting? Do you keep spilling blood?
Posted by bama1959
Huntsville, AL
Member since Nov 2008
5066 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:25 pm to
No one is supporting Russia except those countries under his thumb. Even China has started distancing themselves from that evil bastard.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39415 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Why are they settling for half the territory after the cost we placed on the invasion for them

Russian army is inept. They look like world beaters against weak dicks like Ukraine and Georgia, but NATO would wipe their asses away. A shrinking strategic nuclear force is the only thing propping up Russia.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Russia hasn't won an offensive was since the napoleon era.


What?



Pic taken in Berlin.
Posted by TigerIron
Member since Feb 2021
3873 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:35 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/22/22 at 3:04 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72243 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:36 pm to
They’re not failing. Their numerical superiority is already beginning to tell. But, having said that, the Russians are taking far heavier losses than we did in the Iraqi invasion. That’s why people believe they are failing.

For some historic context, even in the closing weeks of the war when the Wehrmacht was starting to collapse, the Red Army was still taking far heavier losses than the Germans. The Battle of Seelow Heights on the outskirts of Berlin is a prime example. In this battle, fought in the final weeks of the war, the Soviets sustained over 30,000 killed as well as lost 743 tanks and self-propelled guns. German losses numbered around 12,000 killed. The Russians did breakthrough and encircled and captured Berlin a little over two weeks later. But even in Berlin the Soviets lost close to 300,000 casualties, close to 2,000 armored vehicles, and over 900 aircraft.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:37 pm to
The Germans were really good. They inflicted outsized casualties on everyone.
Posted by Alex777
Member since Jan 2022
385 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:37 pm to
The USA decimated Iraq. Just see the casualties Iraq had compared to the USA ( most of the cassualties comes from medical personall and civilians not USA soldiers ) . Only reason it's considered a defeat it's because the USA couldn't stabilize the region after.
This post was edited on 3/2/22 at 8:39 pm
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8131 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

They’re not failing. Their numerical superiority is already beginning to tell. But, having said that, the Russians are taking far heavier losses than we did in the Iraqi invasion. That’s why people believe they are failing.

No, they look like they're failing because their 'convoy' is moving around 2-3 miles per day. They look like they're failing because they fire bombed Kharkov and still can't hold it.

They look like they're failing because they took Kherson 4 days ago and only just felt brave enough to tell that to the world.

Nobody doubted the Russians would 'take the land.' They have air superiority. The question is what happens when the planes aren't flying, the tanks are on the outskirts of town and the Russians are patrolling the city.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
65200 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:41 pm to
For one Ukrainians arent suicide bombing Russians. Thats a go to tactic for Muslims. Sacrifice one for 20. Other cultures will sacrifice 5 to save 1 as we have seen many times.
Posted by footswitch
New Market
Member since Apr 2015
4650 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 8:44 pm to
Patton was right.
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
6307 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

…captured Berlin over two weeks later…


Then raped every German girl and woman they could get their hands on for the next two months.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72243 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Then raped every German girl and woman they could get their hands on for the next two months.


They’d been doing that from the moment they entered German territory.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14914 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:23 pm to
Well he said "offensive war," which WWII was definitively not for the Russians.
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
6307 posts
Posted on 3/2/22 at 10:48 pm to
True, but I was speaking of Berlin. And, it lasted longer than 2 months as well.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram