Started By
Message

re: Is someone going to have to fall on the sword over this Text scandal?

Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
13374 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:36 pm to
I guess i prefer these threads everyday instead of daily ‘when epstein arrests’ threads.

Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
2700 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:39 pm to
Goldberg and the Atlantic are enemies of this administration and enemies of America in general.

There should be 0 people within the Trump administration talking to him about anything, period.

Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5831 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

What information specifically was shared that is a national security risk?


Hey look if none of the info is a national security risk than they should just be transparent and always release these type of communications to the public
Posted by The1TrueTiger
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Member since Apr 2009
2260 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:40 pm to
This is TREASON and heads should roll, not figurately but actually, like nationally broadcasted beheadings, drawn and quartered, and hangings.
Come on MAGA, TREASON! TREASON! TREASON!
Posted by Mason Dixon Swine
West Finger
Member since Jan 2019
2919 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

It's a serious mistake but I don't want to see any fired.


Then what would it take for consequences in your mind? A journalist who's "a conman and sleazbag" according to Trump (hilarious projection btw) was added because they weren't using secure government approved communication channels. Gross incompetence by a bunch of incompetent bootlickers hired only for loyalty, not on merit.
Posted by redneck hippie
Stillwater
Member since Dec 2008
5992 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Do you understand that the reporters phone number was incorrectly listed under another person's name in the phone directory?


Do you have a link to support this statement?
I asked Grok. It said there’s no evidence of this
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
7395 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:44 pm to
I don't believe it was an accident. The fact that Goldberg of all people was the one "accidentaaly" added is hard to believe. Is it just a coincidence that Wong worked for one of the law firms targeted by a Trump E.O. I think that maybe Wong needs to be metaphoricaaly separated from his dong.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
45441 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:45 pm to
Someone's gonna have to be fired. If this was a democrat administration, 90% of this board's threads would be about this topic. I know it, you know it, we all know it.

Trump's probably pissed behind the scenes. Someone's getting fired.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Washington, DC
Member since Dec 2012
4058 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

There should be 0 people within the Trump administration talking to him about anything, period.



That's what makes this whole thing so funny... they're all so incompetent none of them thought to check the list of participants.... and don't give me the bs about how the name was switched or whatever... that sounds to me like some gen Xer not understanding how his phone works and putting in multiple numbers under the same contact....
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
16685 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

There no "scandal".

There is feigned uniparty outrage as they manufacture episodes in an attempt to fracture a very efficient, focused 47 Administration.


This, a mole, Wong, set it up and then tries to claim he dialed up someone by mistake.

So he meant to include JG which is the commerce secretary (commerce secretary in a defense meeting, I guess its the only jg they could find) and somehow hit JG the journalist. Who da fck saves all their contacts with two initials (how would george foreman ever call his sons). Someone that high up in national security, preparing for a strike, is this casual about the meeting?

Fire him and prosecute him as a threat to national security.

This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 1:53 pm
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
14215 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:48 pm to
If Bondi gives an upskirt shot and a press briefing all this news would go away.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
16685 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Then what would it take for consequences in your mind? A journalist who's "a conman and sleazbag" according to Trump (hilarious projection btw) was added because they weren't using secure government approved communication channels. Gross incompetence by a bunch of incompetent bootlickers hired only for loyalty, not on merit.


Well you got one thing right, your tagline....swine
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
70154 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
39113 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:52 pm to
Probably

This is a really bad mistake and you need to establish accountability

Yes this is going to give the left a “win” but you can’t make mustaches like this.
Posted by Mason Dixon Swine
West Finger
Member since Jan 2019
2919 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:53 pm to
Good one. What part of what I said was untrue?
Posted by redneck hippie
Stillwater
Member since Dec 2008
5992 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Yes this is going to give the left a “win” but you can’t make mustaches like this.


I know it’s autocorrect but that’s funny.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
39113 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I know it’s autocorrect but that’s funny.


Ha, I will leave that up…

“Mistakes”
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
1809 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

they send Air National Guard Kid to prison for being careless with sensitive intel on discord


Well that’s one way of putting it.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
8251 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

It's a serious mistake but I don't want to see any fired.


Everyone should want a full investigation.

Who set up the chat? I bet it wasn't Waltz. Probably a staffer.

Who input Goldberg's information? Again, I bet it wasn't Waltz.

How did they get Goldberg's information?

What previous conversations/texts/emails did the person that set up Goldberg in the chat have with Goldberg?

Did these previous communications allude to or discuss setting them up into the chat?

If it can't be determined who setup Goldberg, then we have a deep state frame job occurring.

Lot of questions to be answered.



Posted by Kraut Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
4657 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 2:01 pm to


This post was edited on 4/12/25 at 1:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram