Started By
Message

re: Is it in the best interest of America for Trump to run again?

Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:40 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:40 am to
No. The best thing would be for someone of

better moral fiber
with less arrogance
but equal fight
roughly equivalent fighting instincts
with the name recognition to win

would run.

Who you got?
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
7557 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:45 am to
You forgot:

Independently wealthy so as not to be beholden to special interests.

And I’ll take exception to the low moral fiber remark.

I think DJT is a good guy and loves America. That doesn’t make him a perfect human being.

The fact that he is flawed and what you see is what you get, I believe, is what endeared him to many voters.
Posted by Swazla
Member since Jul 2016
1454 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:46 am to
Yes. He is the best President we have ever had. His reelection was stolen form him and he has the business mind ti get us out of this mess because it is going to need major fiscal and monetary policy actions/

We Need Big Orange
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37700 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Who you got?


DeSantis 2024

Trump needs to play the kingmaker and get the MAGA base behind BDR. Lock down the base and let DeSantis get to work and woo the demographics who can swing the election: the suburban Karens, Hispanics who are fed up with $6 gas, centrist Democrat-lite voters who hate the radical woke left, and the RINOS who like Trump policies but can't stand the man
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:48 am to
quote:

And I’ll take exception to the low moral fiber remark


You can take exception all you’d like. High moral fiber guys don’t bang pornstars while their wife is pregnant and then payoff the pornstar.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:48 am to
Yup. That’s it. There’s no other realistic option, IMO.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30572 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:48 am to
quote:

But


No but. Ever
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
3513 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:49 am to
The old “I love Trump but…”

Sack up, going along to get along has done nothing for conservative values.
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
5063 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:49 am to
Lost the popular vote to an Alzheimer's patient and incredibly unpopular woman....he needs to go golfing in 24
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
11724 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:50 am to
quote:

DeSantis with Trump behind the scenes as counsel.


Hire Sessions. Hire Barr. Hire Bolton. Maybe he should keep his counsel to himself. DeSantis doesn't need the baggage.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56455 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:50 am to
I'd take either Trump or DeSantis. I'm old enough to remember when Mitt Romney and John McCain were called all of the same things Trump has been called. It was a fervor that began with W.

It doesn't matter who we choose, even if it's a full RINO cuck fake republican. They will all be cast as literally Hitler in the lefty narrative, which is 90% of the media.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:51 am to
quote:

and the RINOS who like Trump policies but can't stand the man


The RINOs will not like BDR any more than they liked Trump. Their dislike for Trump was not his personality. He threatened their way of life and worldview. Anyone the public supports (populist) will be the same.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Please don't get me wrong. I love Trump.


Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37700 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 8:56 am to
quote:

The RINOs will not like BDR any more than they liked Trump. Their dislike for Trump was not his personality. He threatened their way of life and worldview. Anyone the public supports (populist) will be the same.




A nationalist populist goes against the neocon Chamber of Commerce stooges for sure....

....but I think even people like Romney are starting to see which way the wind is blowing. I think Turtle will bow out in 2024 since he is already older than dirt.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:00 am to
quote:

neocon Chamber of Commerce stooges


Looking back on these jagoffs and their pretend conservatism is like looking back at Wham’s early performances and wondering how we didn’t realize they were gay.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53674 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:02 am to
That's the risk of Ron. Is he a chamber of commerce stooge?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111608 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Is he a chamber of commerce stooge?


He will ride the fence on that a bit, IMO.
Posted by saintsfan6
TX
Member since Aug 2016
550 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:09 am to
quote:

That's the risk of Ron. Is he a chamber of commerce stooge?


Exactly. While BDR has a track record that is favorable and seems to be the real deal, how do we know he won’t end up being a SWAMPER who is using MAGA to gain power/influence?

For Christ sake, our previous two repub nominees were fricken McCain and Romney. Only until after their presidential run collapsed did they show their true colors. NeoCon RINO that are only looking out for the deep state/NWO.

ETA: with big orange, we know what we are getting.
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 9:10 am
Posted by jackamo3300
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2004
2901 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:20 am to
Depending on perspective, at first glance, "no."

If him being in there incites the Left to do exactly what we've been speculating on and expecting for so long.

Where they're no longer satisfied with just burning down 2 billion here, 2 billion there, of peoples' private property to support one more criminal du jour.

Causing the final civil Armageddon.

If there's anything the doctrinaire, virulent marxist, or armchair, weekend marxist wannabe considers anathema is the ownership of private property.

The destruction of said property to the collective has been a bolshevik ideal and aspiration since at least 1917.

So should we have someone in there who's adept at straddling and continues to defer to them, and does just enough to make it appear to the populace that he's actually attempting to save the Republic instead of just going through the motions.

On second thought, maybe that "no" is a resounding "yes."
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5892 posts
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:30 am to
this is so no president want's Trump in his ear as counsel.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram