- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Irans nuclear enrichment obliterated in June 2025 strikes, Iran did not rebuild them
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:37 pm to notsince98
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:37 pm to notsince98
quote:
any system is capable of failure.
Well if that’s your argument then we should invade every country that has nukes
quote:
That isn't something you "risk" when you dont have to. That is just playing russian roulette.
The risk of losing this war to Iran is higher than us getting hit by one of their nukes. If we lose, bye bye petrodollar
1
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:41 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
Well if that’s your argument then we should invade every country that has nukes
We haven't invaded Iran. If a country threatens us with nukes and they are working on developing them, yes. We should destroy them. Once they have them, assured mutual destruction comes into play and changes things.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:42 pm to notsince98
quote:
To me this is irrelevant. I'm not an advocate of being world police but when they make this threat to your face AND decline your offer of free nuclear fuel forever then they have made it very clear what the end goal is
North Korea, China and Russia make threats all the time.
We're not bombing them and killing their civilians. Iran is the same threat as they've always been. It shouldn't be surprising that any nation resists someone dictating to them how they can run their nation under threat of attack. We're not the good guys in this.
This isn't about security. (Unless we're talking about Israel) This is about Trump's stupid fricking ego. It's going to cost him his legacy, it's likely going to set the GOP back (not that most of them care) for years, it's going to shift young voters back to the left and worst of all, it's going to take that populist wave that the GOP has almost solely ridden to power this last decade and shift it straight into the hands of the socialists. Congrats.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:43 pm to theballguy
quote:Take out the nuclear reasons, Iran is the number 1 sponsors of terror proxies across the globe, they are the reason the Middle East is unstable. Cut off the regime, cut off the money to the proxy groups, cut off the arms support, the logistics and the intel, the Middle East won’t be the same.
Regime change in Iran was the right decision and always will be.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:46 pm to notsince98
quote:
We haven't invaded Iran. If a country threatens us with nukes and they are working on developing them, yes. We should destroy them. Once they have them, assured mutual destruction comes into play and changes things.
so you agree we should have invaded and stopped Israel from gaining nukes then?
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:47 pm to Boston911
quote:
Take out the nuclear reasons, Iran is the number 1 sponsors of terror proxies across the globe, they are the reason the Middle East is unstable. Cut off the regime, cut off the money to the proxy groups, cut off the arms support, the logistics and the intel, the Middle East won’t be the same.
Peace in the middle east is impossible until there is regime change in both iran and israel and both countries are denuclearized
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:47 pm to coolpapaboze
And keep pounding away......Iran must be changed forever!
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:48 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
so you agree we should have invaded and stopped Israel from gaining nukes then?
If they threatened us during negotiations, yes.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:49 pm to notsince98
quote:
If they threatened us during negotiations, yes.
Well JFK tried to keep them from getting nukes and then that thing happened
Posted on 3/18/26 at 4:02 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
We have golden dome. There is zero chance of an iranian nuke reaching the US. Their missles arent capable of leaving the middle east
You serious, Clark?
Your position is that because they can't strike the US mainland directly with a NUKE (that they've clearly stated an intent on using if they acquire one), that it's all good and we should leave them alone?
Baffling.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 4:06 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
Your position is that because they can't strike the US mainland directly with a NUKE (that they've clearly stated an intent on using if they acquire one), that it's all good and we should leave them alone?
There is a country they can strike and want to strike and it’s not us. That is the country we are at war for. The same country that had a prime minister meet with Epstein.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 4:10 pm to AUCom96
You don't understand the difference between rational regimes with nuclear capabilities and irrational regimes with nuclear capabilities?
Posted on 3/18/26 at 4:12 pm to notsince98
That is a good summary but the problem is that Iran is different. Mutually assured destruction only works in the other actor is rational and wants to continue to live. The people running Iran believe that a nuclear war is desirable since they believe it will result in a religious victory for their cause. In other words, they don't care about mutual destruction. We would consider them to be crazy. Can't let a person who wants to end the world have a nuke.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 4:23 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
"It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat," she said. "That is up to the president, based on a volume of information that he receives."
There ya go! That's ALL that needs to be said. This issue has been put to rest.
POTUS, the only elected government official that all Americans can vote for, made his decision. Now, stfu and vote harder next time!!! Lol
Must suck to be anti Trump losers!!!
I remember when y'all were on here just before the election predicting how Trump couldn't win!!! Go spew your TDS infected ideas into the mirror!
Posted on 3/18/26 at 4:25 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
You serious, Clark?
Your position is that because they can't strike the US mainland directly with a NUKE (that they've clearly stated an intent on using if they acquire one), that it's all good and we should leave them alone?
Baffling.
Baffling is putting it mildly. I call it absolute stupidity!
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:56 pm to coolpapaboze
quote:turn them all into glass
only way to truly end the program
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:41 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
"So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's air strikes," Ossoff asked.
"Yes," Gabbard said.
Ossoff asked her whether there had been "no effort since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability."
"Correct?" he asked.
"That's right," she said.
It's a good thing then that Rubio told us the threat was their ever-growing drone and missile arsenal that would have eventually made stopping them much more deadly.
Why do people constantly ignore this fact? Is it because it goes against the narrative that Iran was no threat?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News