- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/2/18 at 6:26 am to Ebbandflow
quote:Science proves that which you call just a mass of cells is equally human to you.
I'm sorry that you think science can be so cruel but there's just really not a lot to backup your idea that this is murdering a human somehow
Just at different points in their life cycle.
Please don't ever reproduce, the world has more than enough morons without you adding more
Posted on 3/2/18 at 7:00 am to Rex
quote:
A single sperm cell has life.
Life is not the issue.
So, life: check
Human: check
But not "human life"? Is it a lizard life? Salt life? (eta: an embryo, unlike a "single sperm cell," also has a genetic identity that is different from each of its progenitors--sorry, sorry, i keep forgetting, you hate science)
These are the gymnastics it takes to make these homicides "justifiable."
What is it? Only "viable" human life deserves constitutional protection?
I'll hit the ball back in your court to tell me how this all works in the Nazi mind:
We are willing to guess about viability? Real-life example: My wife teaches a precious deaf girl (she is black, btw, a "race" whose members are disproportionate victims of this form of murder) who can now hear due to cochlear implants--a miracle of science, a method which you apparently despise.
She was born at 24 weeks. Was she viable? Only in hindsight? Half the states would've allowed her to be murdered. Now she can hear and speak. You, sir, are a monster.
Are you monsters willing to draw the distinction between viable and inviable human life based on what side of a piece of skin the "thing" happens to find itself?
"Move one millimeter this way, ma'am... voila! (sorry, walla!), congratulations. You are now a human life according to Rex, and I bestow upon thee all of these here rights attendant thereto!"
Question: if you leave a 2 year old to her own devices, will she be "viable"?
The best theoretical argument to me for legal abortion is, legalization actually reduces the number of abortions over time.
But a) I highly doubt that's true (show me), b) that isn't how our justice system works, and c) if it is indeed how it works or how you think it should work, then anyone who is pro-abortion and yet pro-gun-bans is a sad little hypocrite.
I have a lot more, I can't wait to see the next Rex screen turd.
This post was edited on 3/2/18 at 7:39 am
Posted on 3/2/18 at 7:16 am to Sus-Scrofa
Most physicians take some form of a Hippocratic oath seriously and won't perform abortions. Those that do often come from the dregs of the profession.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 7:19 am to Boatshoes
quote:
Those that do often come from the dregs of the profession.
Case in point:

Posted on 3/2/18 at 7:40 am to McLemore
You're lying to yourself if you think that isn't a human life. I won't even post the disgusting pictures of partial birth abortions. It's sad that many in our society have a cold heart that cares nothing about human life.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 7:57 am to Walkthedawg
quote:
You're lying to yourself if you think that isn't a human life
i assume this is a generic "yourself" or else was intended for Rex and the other Nazi abortionists in this threat, and not me.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:11 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Iowa senate passes bill banning abortions once heartbeat is detected
Props and Jesus agrees with this
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:17 am to RollTide1987
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!!!
Oh, wait.
Oh, wait.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:20 am to McLemore
quote:
assume this is a generic "yourself" or else was intended for Rex and the other Nazi abortionists in this threat, and not me.
I was agreeing with you
Posted on 3/2/18 at 8:25 am to CommoDawg
quote:while I agree with the law, this is a waste of time
Waste of time, will be overturned
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:09 am to tjv305
If by special you mean evil you would be correct.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:18 am to crazycubes
quote:
while I agree with the law, this is a waste of time
Maybe not. The SC may want to hear it, and Roe is just a bad interpretation. Even pro-abortion people concede there is no basis for the opinion other than it is what the Justices wanted to be the opinion.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:26 am to BlackAdam
quote:
there is no basis for the opinion other than it is what the Justices wanted to be the opinion.
Yeah, abortion aside, it is inimical to our constitutional republic and the rule of written law and separation of powers generally.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:30 am to Walkthedawg
quote:
I won't even post the disgusting pictures of partial birth abortions.
Partial birth abortions are illegal in the US, except when the mom's life is in danger.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:33 am to GetCocky11
quote:
Partial birth abortions are illegal in the US, except when the mom's life is in danger.
But aborting at 24-26 weeks isn't in half the states. See my post about wife's patient.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:37 am to McLemore
quote:
quote:
Partial birth abortions are illegal in the US, except when the mom's life is in danger.
quote:
But aborting at 24-26 weeks isn't in half the states. See my post about wife's patient.
I was just responding to the poster who talked about posting photos of partial-birth abortions. It would have been irrelevant and an emotional fallacy.
Posted on 3/2/18 at 9:40 am to GetCocky11
About like the gun debate.
Popular
Back to top


0





