- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/21/19 at 7:36 am to stelly1025
Yeah I believe it's an easy assumption to make that the fella was tagged for max penalties on everything, no deals to be had with the DA.
I'm also going to go out on a limb and opine that had all facts and circumstances been exactly the same EXCEPT substitute in say a MAGA flag instead of pride flag.....not near the concern. Not even close.
I'm also going to go out on a limb and opine that had all facts and circumstances been exactly the same EXCEPT substitute in say a MAGA flag instead of pride flag.....not near the concern. Not even close.
Posted on 12/21/19 at 7:39 am to davyjones
quote:
had all facts and circumstances been exactly the same EXCEPT substitute in say a MAGA flag instead of pride flag
Heck, it would have ended at "Freedom of Speech".
"Well, he's just so outraged by the events around him that he had to act out. He promised not to do it again. Also, the court has donated to his gofundme account, and we suggest that the 'victim' do the same."
Posted on 12/21/19 at 7:54 am to AggieHank86
quote:My prediction was wrong. Apparently, you lack even the balls to attempt to defend your ridiculous assertion.
Please reference each post (by Username and Time) that YOU think constitutes a defense of the length of this sentence.
PREDICTION. You will point to a post or poster who tried to explain the difference between (1) burning an owned flag in a perfectly-legal protest and (2) violating the rights of another person by destroying that person’s property.
Posted on 12/21/19 at 7:57 am to davyjones
quote:He was the recipient of three different enhancements in the sentencing process.
Looks like guy's sentence was enhanced under habitual offender law. Two prior felony convictions I believe one of the articles said.
Recidivism enhancement.
Hate crime enhancement.
Acting like an a-hole in court enhancement.
Yep, he ended up under the jail house.
Posted on 12/21/19 at 8:08 am to Placebeaux
Hopefully, he gets pardoned after the 1st year and the alphabet cult will lose their collective minds.
Posted on 12/21/19 at 8:14 am to AggieHank86
True, forgot about the hate crime enhancement. That would have been in connection with one of the underlying charges, I believe the arson was the offense enhanced with hate crime status.
Not sure about Iowa, but in Louisiana the sentence in the underlying conviction used to habitualize must be vacated once the separate habitual offender sentence is handed down. In other words, I'm not sure if it's possible to use hate crime enhancement and habitual offender enhancement at the same time.
Not sure about Iowa, but in Louisiana the sentence in the underlying conviction used to habitualize must be vacated once the separate habitual offender sentence is handed down. In other words, I'm not sure if it's possible to use hate crime enhancement and habitual offender enhancement at the same time.
Posted on 12/21/19 at 8:21 am to AggieHank86
We know the "why" of it
It's still a completely immoral sentence and, the prosecutor who pushed for it is the biggest criminal in this story for doing so.
It's still a completely immoral sentence and, the prosecutor who pushed for it is the biggest criminal in this story for doing so.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News