- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In case you thought Student Loans was a dead issue...
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:06 pm to DiamondDog
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:06 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
Possibly reduced interest rates for STEM degrees.
Not Accounting?
Business?
Architecture?
Political Science?
Psychology?
There’s a ton of steady paying jobs that those degrees can lead to.
Computer Science is overloaded with graduates who are going to become more obsolete with AI. The job market is being outsourced to India, too.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:08 pm to DiamondDog
There needs to be limits on how much you can borrow based on the degree you are pursuing and the expected earnings you will get. Can you repay the loan with the degree you are pursuing?
Second, if a student isn’t making grades, no more loans until they make a dent in the principal. If you aren’t serious about school, take some time off and figure your life out, but you aren’t running up a bunch of debt you won’t be able to pay. After you pay down a certain percentage of the loan, then you can reapply.
The rest that are already mired in debt, pay it back. I’m good with a better interest rate, although the hundred plus thousand I paid back was at the interest rates we have today. Life is tough, even tougher if you aren’t paying attention.
Second, if a student isn’t making grades, no more loans until they make a dent in the principal. If you aren’t serious about school, take some time off and figure your life out, but you aren’t running up a bunch of debt you won’t be able to pay. After you pay down a certain percentage of the loan, then you can reapply.
The rest that are already mired in debt, pay it back. I’m good with a better interest rate, although the hundred plus thousand I paid back was at the interest rates we have today. Life is tough, even tougher if you aren’t paying attention.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:10 pm to DiamondDog
You’re looking at solving the symptoms and not the cause. Student loans should be much less available. That’s the only way to bring back reasonable tuition and fees.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:12 pm to DiamondDog
I don’t see a problem with making the loans, even the ones on the books, 2%. But the govt needs to make these payments bonds to the schools and only do it for in-demand skill sets. The bonds are a certain amount each year and the school has to pay them back when the student repays them. ie a four year degree, then 6 years to pay it off is a 10 year bond with the payback starting at year 5.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:15 pm to bluestem75
quote:
Not Accounting? Business? Architecture? Political Science? Psychology? There’s a ton of steady paying jobs that those degrees can lead to. Computer Science is overloaded with graduates who are going to become more obsolete with AI. The job market is being outsourced to India, too.
None of those are any safer from AI, I’d say less so. College is going to be a waste of time and money for anyone not in the top bracket in any field because of AI.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:24 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
They need to reform the interest rates to ensure payback of funds.
Absolutely not.
They need to stop guaranteeing loans in the first place.
Problem solved.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:25 pm to NIH
quote:
You’re looking at solving the symptoms and not the cause. Student loans should be much less available. That’s the only way to bring back reasonable tuition and fees.
This is the correct answer.
The government needs to stop guaranteeing them. If a private institution wants to loan money to someone going to college, so be it.
But if the borrower defaults, suck it.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:25 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
It encourages worthless degrees and funnels people to the government bureaucracy.
How else do you plan on getting college educated people to teach while making like 40k a year?
Would you send your kid to be taught by someone who stopped school after 12th grade?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:26 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Absolutely not.
I see where you are coming from, but the rates are borderline predatory considering they shop them to 18-22 year old's who largely have no real concept of personal finances or how interest accrues.
Yes, its still an adult that needs to live up to their obligations, but if they goal is to actually get them paid back instead of defaults or forgiveness, 7+% interest rates probably isn't the way to go.
ETA: I 100% agree with your other post that the feds have no place in this arena. If banks, etc. want to give college loans, let them.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:32 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
How else do you plan on getting college educated people to teach while making like 40k a year?
Would you send your kid to be taught by someone who stopped school after 12th grade?
The Amish junior high aged girls teach the elementary students in that community and they score at the top of the pack in the state every year.
Frankly, the entire educational system needs to be reformed. Once you learn to read and master basic math functions you can learn online with some infrequent exceptions.
So we shouldn't need teachers past about 5th or 6th grade except to act as tutors for students who are struggling with something. After that, everything should be online and students should just learn at their own pace. You could maintain a much smaller facility (since it would only be used for tutoring and the rare lab or art or music class that required meeting in person).
And the biggest thing is that we shouldn't force people to participate. Don't care if your kid learns? Fine, keep him or her out so that he or she doesn't keep other kids from learning. To quote Judge Smails, the world needs ditch diggers too.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:34 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
The Amish junior high aged girls teach the elementary students in that community and they score at the top of the pack in the state every year.
Frankly, the entire educational system needs to be reformed. Once you learn to read and master basic math functions you can learn online with some infrequent exceptions.
So we shouldn't need teachers past about 5th or 6th grade except to act as tutors for students who are struggling with something. After that, everything should be online and students should just learn at their own pace. You could maintain a much smaller facility (since it would only be used for tutoring and the rare lab or art or music class that required meeting in person).
And the biggest thing is that we shouldn't force people to participate. Don't care if your kid learns? Fine, keep him or her out so that he or she doesn't keep other kids from learning. To quote Judge Smails, the world needs ditch diggers too.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:38 pm to DiamondDog
Government needs to GTFO it altogether. When gov took over student loans they quadrupled, more by now. It needs to go back to a competitive private sector... just like medical.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:40 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I see where you are coming from
I don't think you do.
Where I am coming from is this:
1. Either 18 year olds are capable of making responsible choices regarding these loans or they aren't. If they are, then they should be turning the loans down anyway if they are really "borderline predatory," or they should make good on their end of the agreement if they decide to accept the terms. If they aren't capable of making responsible choices regarding the loans, then we need to stop loaning them the money. It's unethical to keep doing it. You can't have it both ways.
2. As another poster already posted, the entire reason we have a system in which costs rise much faster than the rate of inflation in the first place is these loans. Forget about the interest rate. That's a red herring. Get rid of the loans and you will also do away with the overwhelming majority of the need for the loan in the first place.
quote:
I 100% agree with your other post that the feds have no place in this arena. If banks, etc. want to give college loans, let them.
Sure, and they will issue very few of them. Because they are a horrible risk.
For example, did you know that a solid 40% of students who start college drop out and do not finish? Almost half. And that includes students in STEM fields. I don't know this, but common sense says that the STEM fields are probably OVER represented in that statistic, since those majors are harder and almost certainly will have higher dropout rates.
About the only loans you're going to see from the private sector for someone going to college is some kid who aced undergrad and has a track record to note who wants to go to grad school or law school or med school at Stanford or Harvard or something like that.
So basically if the government stops guaranteeing the loans, the loans will effectively stop for 98% of students.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:42 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
JohnnyKilroy
I assume you're laughing at the notion that it takes someone with a master's degree to effectively teach elementary students, since it's a fact that the Amish 8th graders perform better at that task than most of the teachers in professional unions.
Maybe you're laughing at the fact that I didn't suggest anything that wasn't mandated and observed almost nationwide during COVID except that we stop forcing people to participate in something that you can't really force people to participate in anyway. Which is why the DOE reports that almost 20% of high school GRADUATES can't read.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:51 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
1. Either 18 year olds are capable of making responsible choices regarding these loans or they aren't. If they are, then they should be turning the loans down anyway if they are really "borderline predatory," or they should make good on their end of the agreement if they decide to accept the terms. If they aren't capable of making responsible choices regarding the loans, then we need to stop loaning them the money. It's unethical to keep doing it. You can't have it both ways.
Like I said, I get it. But modern reality is that 18 year old Americans largely do not understand personal finances, as I've already said. They simply aren't taught it at school, and its becoming more and more likely that their parents are debt-riddled too as the cycle enters its second generation. It depends what the goal is. If we want actual repayment instead of defaults and constant pressure for loan forgiveness, lowering or cutting the rates could help accomplish that. I pay my student loans every month and it sucks like any other bill, but I needed them to get the degree that I hold. I hate that there are people who feel entitled to loan forgiveness, but its probably time (across the political board and not just this issue) to start considering the possible instead of the ideal as far as solutions go.
quote:
So basically if the government stops guaranteeing the loans, the loans will effectively stop for 98% of students.
If that is the result, so be it. We've artificially inflated universities and non-specialized college degrees in this country for long enough.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:53 pm to DiamondDog
Pay your way. If you take any Gov money then you owe them 4 years of military service. Very simple solution
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:56 pm to OU Guy
quote:
Pay your way.
I'm guessing that you went to school 40 years ago, if at all?
Not supporting loan forgiveness by any stretch, but its ludicrous to expect current college kids to complete pay tuition out of pocket. You aren't paying 20k tuition plus living expenses off a part time waiter gig or being a runner at the local billboard law firm.
While I completely agree that a ton, if not the majority of college degrees are worthless and a waste of time, I am not sure that we want to totally box out anyone who can't afford to pay four years of tuition in cash.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:58 pm to Indefatigable
You have a choice and if you make it college thats on you.
We are not a communist country!
We are not a communist country!
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:01 pm to OU Guy
quote:
You have a choice and if you make it college thats on you.
Not everyone is made to be a welder, or insert preferred blue collar trade here.
The issue isn't as black and white as you are making it. Society and the government practically forced a generation, going on two generations, of Americans to go to college because it was "essential" to get a job. I'm not for absolving personal responsibility, but it isn't as simple as "if you couldn't afford school out of your parent's bank accounts then frick you."
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:12 pm to Indefatigable
You love socialism don’t you. In US you make choices. Choose college you pay. Don’t and you have no college debt so make less but debt free.
Its all about choices vs handing kids money like a good commie would. Nothing mandates college. Nothing.
Its all about choices vs handing kids money like a good commie would. Nothing mandates college. Nothing.
Popular
Back to top


1



