- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:31 am to Wednesday
Romney and Sasse YES frickers.
Cassidy, Lee, Turtle Rubio, Thune, Toomey voted NO
Cassidy, Lee, Turtle Rubio, Thune, Toomey voted NO
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 9:32 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:32 am to cajunangelle
Frick Lindsey Graham.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:32 am to cajunangelle
Graham YES... what a hypocrite
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:32 am to ReauxlTide222
Graham just changed vote to Aye YES what a mother fricker
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:32 am to Wednesday
Did I hear right? Miss Lindsey changed her vote to Aye?
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:33 am to ReauxlTide222
Leahy now saying they can't know what they are voting on?
What in the entire frick?
What in the entire frick?
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:33 am to cajunangelle
Turtle voted no.
Ms. Lindsey changed her vote to no. I think it’s Bc he wanted more than one witness.
Johnson asked to clarify whether they were voting on only one witness and the Leahy living dead refused.
Ms. Lindsey changed her vote to no. I think it’s Bc he wanted more than one witness.
Johnson asked to clarify whether they were voting on only one witness and the Leahy living dead refused.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:33 am to HubbaBubba
That’s correct. Frick Graham.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 9:35 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:34 am to ReauxlTide222
They are changing the rules mid vote. 1 witness is all.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:36 am to YankeeBama
This is a clown show. No wonder our country is in this shape.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 9:37 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:37 am to HubbaBubba
They wanted to know if it was a vote for one witness or more or what? Leahy said you can't discuss this before the vote. Then Graham stands up and changes to go with the dems to a YES vote.
Then I think it was Rubio asked
they were voting on.
55-35 Yay to subpoena witness but no one knows how many. So the dems will call who they want...
now an absence of a quorum. what does this even mean?
Then I think it was Rubio asked
they were voting on. 55-35 Yay to subpoena witness but no one knows how many. So the dems will call who they want...
now an absence of a quorum. what does this even mean?
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 9:39 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:38 am to YankeeBama
Yep since dems are the majority. Only the dems will be allowed a witness and not Trump because this is their kill shot.
I think Turtle & Graham with McCarthy are in on it....
This makes my blood boil.
I think Turtle & Graham with McCarthy are in on it....
This makes my blood boil.
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:39 am to cajunangelle
I think Lindsay voted yes, because he planned on calling a shite ton of witnesses, or so he says. Now he can say “they wouldn’t let me”. And trump will be convicted. McCarthy jumped ship and signed with the Devil.
This post was edited on 2/13/21 at 9:41 am
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:40 am to YankeeBama
I think That’s what Lindsey was thinking.
It is unclear to me how many witnesses.
I want to say the motion was to call witness(es) plural. Leahy the Living Dead refused to clarify. I’m not near a tv or sound right now
It is unclear to me how many witnesses.
I want to say the motion was to call witness(es) plural. Leahy the Living Dead refused to clarify. I’m not near a tv or sound right now
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:41 am to cajunangelle
quote:Apparently it’s just a stall tactic so they can get on the same page.
now an absence of a quorum. what does this even mean?
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:42 am to Wednesday
quote:
I think That’s what Lindsey was thinking.
It is unclear to me how many witnesses.
I want to say the motion was to call witness(es) plural. Leahy the Living Dead refused to clarify. I’m not near a tv or sound right now
Only 2 scenarios now
1) Lindsay genuinely thinks he can call a metric ton of witnesses to help trump
2) Lindsay knows that he can’t call witnesses but pretends that he thought he could, but is really working with McCarthy to bury Trump
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:43 am to YankeeBama
quote:
I think Lindsay voted yes, because he plans on calling a shite ton of witnesses
I believe it was just said witness-meaning the one they all have cooked up-the democrat partisan that took subcutaneous notes. IOW's the plot is set because they don't have the votes to convict because Trump's lawyers did very well...
Now, Graham has said weeks ago... he would call all those responsible for the security by the hundreds.
Will they allow this? Doubtful. They will have the dem hack come in like Fiona; and then call a vote to say case closed...
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:44 am to YankeeBama
I think it’s 1
Lindsey is a trial lawyer
He realized there was no limit on the number of witnesses.
I don’t have sound right now but I’m going to have to
Look back and check. I dont Think the motion limited the # of witnesses in any way
Lindsey is a trial lawyer
He realized there was no limit on the number of witnesses.
I don’t have sound right now but I’m going to have to
Look back and check. I dont Think the motion limited the # of witnesses in any way
Posted on 2/13/21 at 9:45 am to YankeeBama
quote:2 for a thousand, Alex.
Only 2 scenarios now
1) Lindsay genuinely thinks he can call a metric ton of witnesses to help trump
2) Lindsay knows that he can’t call witnesses but pretends that he thought he could, but is really working with McCarthy to bury Trump
Page 40 of 50
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News