- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’m starting to come to the conclusion that Andrew Yang is Trump’s most dangerous opponent
Posted on 6/19/19 at 3:14 pm to claremontrich
Posted on 6/19/19 at 3:14 pm to claremontrich
quote:
the "Oriental " is really going to get Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson , Elijah Cummings and John Lewis off their butts and move their voters to the polls to vote for him come election day.
LOL those people are IRRELEVANT AF when it comes to national presidential elections, don't recall them making a single impact for Hillary back in 2016 they may as well have been good as dead. Notwithstanding the qualities I listed for Yang that make him a viable darkhorse, dude's gonna be well-funded and likely will succeed in getting the brand out, the debates will be critical in advancing that but the notion he needs the 4 aforementioned racist dinosaurs for anything is laughable at best.
1
Posted on 6/19/19 at 3:16 pm to OMLandshark
quote:Does Marco know you've been sucking a new dick?
OMLandshark
Posted on 6/19/19 at 3:20 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
This. I agree. Dude is dark horse dangerous.
For the right reasons -- the type of guy who should be in charge/in a position of power
Posted on 6/19/19 at 4:07 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Does Marco know you've been sucking a new dick?
I only supported Marco for like 3 months once Paul dropped out.
Posted on 6/19/19 at 4:40 pm to Muthsera
quote:
Link?
I hadn't noticed the infrastructure investments at a federal or state level, let alone a municipal level, that would allow anything remotely like this to happen.
There isn't a single electric charging station in my town of 60,000 people, but you think all trucking jobs will be filled by autonomous drivers in 10 years? No fricking way.
I watched an entire documentary report on Vice news about the trucking industry and automation. The main guy on there (protagonist) ran a company that designed artificial intelligence like an Uber for the trucks. They had truckers also on their showing them the future while asking their thoughts on the automation pros and cons. They sat on the truck as it drove from one spot to the other perfectly and dropped off the goods. That is the future of trucking. And, essentially most of our Workforce in the next 10 to 20 years.
Who the hell downvotes the obviois amd reality?
It is here. You can see it for your damn self and read about it.
This isnt hocus pocus horse shite. How we deal with this linear path is how the middle of the 21st century moves forward for better or worse..
This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 6/19/19 at 4:44 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I only supported Marco for like 3 months once Paul dropped out
With a post count that could have covered 3 years
Posted on 6/19/19 at 6:53 pm to ThePTExperience1969
LOL those people are IRRELEVANT AF when it comes to national presidential elections, don't recall them making a single impact for Hillary back in 2016 they may as well have been good as dead. Notwithstanding the qualities I listed for Yang that make him a viable darkhorse, dude's gonna be well-funded and likely will succeed in getting the brand out, the debates will be critical in advancing that but the notion he needs the 4 aforementioned racist dinosaurs for anything is laughable at best.
you’re aware that for any Democrat still don’t have a chance to win a national election they need an extremely high African-American turn out and then get the expected 90% of the African-American vote.
Hillary didn’t achieve it and that’s why she lost.
If yang still doesn’t achieve it he’s going to lose.
If Biden doesn’t achieve it he’s going to lose.
If Hillary can’t get the African-American base excited do you think a dude who looks like some of the shopkeepers shooting at looters and watts 1994 riots will have a chance ?
And before you post I’m aware Yang is Chinese and the shopkeepers were Korean .
There’s no difference as far as the Democrats are concerned.
This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 6/19/19 at 10:31 pm to claremontrich
quote:
you’re aware that for any Democrat still don’t have a chance to win a national election they need an extremely high African-American turn out and then get the expected 90% of the African-American vote.
They usually fall in line for this stuff when it comes to the Dems
quote:
Hillary didn’t achieve it and that’s why she lost.
Makes sense she's one of the most corrupt people running for the presidency, a genuinely fake person, and flip-flops more than the amount of flip-flops I even own plus she called black men "super predators"
quote:
If yang still doesn’t achieve it he’s going to lose.
Like I said before young, rich, entrepreneur, getting his brand out there, no connections to the swamp, and apparently Obama thought enough of him to partner up in some initiatives
quote:
If Biden doesn’t achieve it he’s going to lose.
Good luck with that as it relates to Sleepy and Low Energy Joe Biden, dude doesn't bring the heat, he doesn't evoke the fire, will be the same result as Hillary
quote:
If Hillary can’t get the African-American base excited do you think a dude who looks like some of the shopkeepers shooting at looters and watts 1994 riots will have a chance ?
For the reasons I stated 3x now yah, though the dude espouses socialist policies, he's not a swamp creature and has a positive connection to Obama with the initiatives, like we saw at this thread's beginning, Yang generates crowds and shite, high-energy
Posted on 6/19/19 at 11:51 pm to ThePTExperience1969
Yang and Tulsi are the best the Dems have to offer but neither have a chance in hell at the nomination.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 12:16 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:Most people aren't on government assistance. This @argument”makes no sense as it would be an increase for a wide majority.
If it's less than what they are currently leaching off the system, then there is marginal benefit.
quote:Anyone for UBI is Indeed a populist ideologue. There is no economic rational supporting it. It’s straight up vote buying with taxpayer money.
Again, I'm not for UBI, just speaking to Andrew Yang's thoughtfulness. He's not an ideologue, which is refreshing.
You appear to have been bought very cheaply.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 12:18 am to bmy
quote:
He's for a 'freedom dividend'
I’ll bite. What was the “investment” paying off here? Posted on 6/20/19 at 12:22 am to Johnpettigrew
quote:You’re willing to put up no resistance to the government as it does the exact same thing an assailant does to you. Both are using force to take your money.
would rather pay a little more in taxes than have to shoot and possibly kill another human being who is standing in my house or pulls a gun on me in the street. My life gets way more complicated in that situation than paying 3% more in income taxes.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News