Started By
Message

re: IG Report on FISA abuse is going to be a total whitewash

Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146790 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:20 pm to
Listen to Bongino's show today and you will understand why the NYTimes and WaPo are being believed just a little bit.

LINK

WaPo (which no one read last night because no one here has a paid subscription) and was in the final paragraphs...that WaPo reports there was still a predicate to investigate Trump. IOW's the poor FBI/DOJ brahs really thought Trump could be a Russian asset and they did this for NatSec...

NYTimes says no one will see justice.

The only thing that gives me hope (after watching Bongino) is that both WaPo and NYTimes are completely making shite up and there wasn't a proper predicate to the coup.
This post was edited on 11/22/19 at 4:21 pm
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:20 pm to
Lol.

Hannity might legitimately have THE WORST sources in America

Every one of his tick-tocks have been dead wrong
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15416 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:21 pm to
Bad News: Half the Scumbags who need to go down would already seen what’s in the IG Report and would know their arse received a criminal referral. Accordingly, the only criminal referrals we should expect to see are low level people we’ve never heard of.

Good News: low level randos facing an indictment, can and will report their superiors and testify against the people I would like to see prosecuted and otherwise ruined and humiliated. No low level rando on his own opens a FISA investigation or is protected for lying on a FISA application for 3 years without the assistance of the big dogs higher up the food chain.

Also, I cannot see how all the Misfud shadiness would be addressed by IG. Durham went to Italy. Not Horowitz. Why would Durham go there if not but to do something about Misfud?

Further, POTUS this morning said the IG report would be “historic”. I’m not sure how disclosing one low level person is historic. I’d expect this to mean that the IG report is a big fuss at to the DOJ to clean up its act.

Finally, to date all the info has been from the NYT, CNN and Wapo. This info was likely provided by the same assholes who deserve to go down- so it is in no way reliable or anything other than self-serving.

The IG report will be an appetizer. There will be referrals, but they won’t be anything significant. Durham is going to be the real deal.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69301 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:21 pm to
Bunyan, why are you believing the NYt when they outright say they don’t have a draft and haven’t reviewed anything?
Posted by Yak
DuPage County
Member since May 2014
4672 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

WaPo (which no one read last night because no one here has a paid subscription)
Just an FYI - if you want to read a WaPo article, view it in incognito mode
Posted by GeauxCali
Member since Nov 2019
479 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

What was the predicate to acquire the FISA warrant?

Keep asking that question.

It has NEVER been answered
its been answered a billion times, you just don't like the answer.

The investigation into Russian interference began in July of 2016

The first FISA warrant was applied for in October of 2016

The Russia investigation was ongoing by then, it was never based on anything in any FISA warrant or anything in the Steele dossier. This is the plain and simple reality.

the FBI opened the investigation on July 31, 2016, after an Australian diplomat informed the FBI about a disturbing conversation he’d had with Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos two months before the WikiLeaks release of Clinton’s emails.

In that conversation, Papadopoulos had bragged that the Russians had political dirt on Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign."
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:22 pm to
What a sheep.
Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3450 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Horowitz couldn’t find political bias with Strozk

Horowitz didn’t interview the security detail for Bill Clinton to determine if his tarmac meeting with Loretta Lynch was actually spur of the moment or pre-planned. Horowitz is the swamp
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Bunyan, why are you believing the NYt when they outright say they don’t have a draft and haven’t reviewed anything?

Until arrests are made...or there is ANY accountability, I'll always question whether something is up

It's been 3 years
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146790 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:24 pm to
I don't think it is funny. This better be fake news from WaPo and the NYTimes.

Why would the WaPo NYtimes and deep state want people thinking they are innocent when the report will say so and may put egg on their faces?

If they did nothing what is Durham doing? Taking down the kid that made the error at the FBI in all of this time?

Somethings fricky...
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118782 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

You have to wait for the report

The people leaking to the NYt are trying to start a narrative

Take it with an extreme grain of salt


Fair enough. However I’m still lowering my expectations.
Posted by BIGFOOD
Member since Jun 2011
12500 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Durham is going to be the real deal.


I hope you're right. *fingers crossed*
Posted by LeroooyJenkins
Member since Nov 2017
1058 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:32 pm to
Some disinformation necessary







Hopefully
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19810 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

IG Report on FISA abuse is going to be a total whitewash


Then why is the NYT letting this as part of the Friday News Dump Cycle? This is when they throw out the most flimsy and poorly sourced stories.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69301 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:35 pm to
Geauxcali, that is an OUTRIGHT LIE

Papadouplos NEVER told downer he heard Russia had clinton emails

He, according to Downer’s own words, said during drinks that Russia had “dirt” on Hillary.

It was downer who made the grand hypothesis that he was referring to emails.

Papadouplos never said anything about dnc emails or podesta emails, he never said anything about Wikileaks, or tactical leaks of the emails.

The investigation was basically started based on hearsay from a diplomat.

In the intel community, that is called RUMINT (rumor intelligence). It is not supposed to be used to start a probe
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
25315 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Instead he is focusing on everything downstream of acquiring the FISA warrant and ignoring the fact that the FISA warrant was illegally obtained to spy on Trump.
Like Orange Man Bad for requesting review of corruption by the Biden's instead of being concerned that Biden clan is/was corrupt. Sad.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46097 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:37 pm to
This has been a concern of mine from the get go. The problem facing the Swamp is now many millions of Americans know the gross level of corruption and the obvious politicization of the FBI/DOJ/Intel Agencies. If no one is held accountable I fear there’s a threshold that’s going to be surpassed and the American patriots are going to demand justice.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62438 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:38 pm to
Trump was a Russian spy was the Predicate, which was a Clinton lie. The intel heads had to figure a back channel to spy on him, which will be covered up, just watch...
Posted by GeauxCali
Member since Nov 2019
479 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:44 pm to
quote:


The investigation was basically started based on hearsay from a diplomat
hearsay about Russia using stolen emails to interfere with a presidential election.

Take Right and Left out of this, in what universe is the FBI supposed to simply ignore something like that? Of course that's the kind of thing they're going to follow up on, its insane to think otherwise.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146790 posts
Posted on 11/22/19 at 4:48 pm to
Why was McCabe on CNN last night saying he couldn't speak of the report on air, (we know he is leaking off air) and NOT UNDER A PRISON?

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram