- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:42 pm to Rakim
quote:
Just looking at the groups we have seen shut down so for, most look to be White Supremacist groups if I'm not mistaken? Could and should Antifa also be kicked off these websites and considered a hate group?
Well. Given that in 2017, ANTIFA is 100x worse......
quote:
I'm not even saying I agree because I'm probably the biggest 1st amendment guy on this board. I don't think anyone should be banned on TD.
I subscribe to absolute freedom of speech
And i hold it as a core value. I don't cop out with the "well they aren't arresting you" rhetoric
This is what makes me and others like me VASTLY better human beings than most liberals.
VASTLY better
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:42 pm to Rakim
George Karlin would kick your arse.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:43 pm to Rakim
quote:They are under the Oregon Equality Act of 2007
I don't think gays are a protected class according to the Constitution?
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:44 pm to roadGator
quote:
George Karlin would kick your arse.
No but George Carlin probably would...
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:45 pm to Rakim
They both would. 
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:47 pm to Rakim
quote:
Not serving or baking for someone who that's gay is bigoted. Shutting down hateful points of view is a moral distinction.
Woof
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:48 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
They are under the Oregon Equality Act of 2007
Yea, but that's not what I'm talking about. They are not afforded special treatment or consideration because of their sexual preference. This law simply states they cant be discriminated against.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:49 pm to roadGator
quote:
They both would.
I really miss George Carlin, he was my favorite comedian and quite honestly had a huge political influence on me.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:50 pm to Rakim
quote:There is zero valid reason why any form of private discrimination against ANYONE should be illegal.
This law simply states they can be discriminated against.
Zero
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:55 pm to Rakim
quote:
But don't those tech companies have conduct policies before people sign on to use product?
If they do, that sounds like discrimination to me...straight up. Is that kind of bigotry still legal in 2017????
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:56 pm to Rakim
quote:I think you mean can't. And when you refuse service on the basis of someone's sexuality, which the bakers stupidly admitted to, then you're in violation of that law.
This law simply states they can be discriminated against.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:57 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
There is zero valid reason why any form of private discrimination against ANYONE should be illegal.
I respectfully disagree with you on that point. Not allowing someone access to groceries or a restaurant etc., like we saw during Jim Crow is wrong on so many levels but continue.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:58 pm to Rakim
quote:
I respectfully disagree with you on that point. Not allowing someone access to groceries or a restaurant etc., like we saw during Jim Crow is wrong on so many levels but continue
Jim Crow was law.
At least know what you oppose
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:59 pm to JuiceTerry
Correct - Juice I mistyped, thanks for pointing that out.
Also, that goes for straight people, asexual Hispanics - whatever.
Also, that goes for straight people, asexual Hispanics - whatever.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:00 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
They are under the Oregon Equality Act of 2007
That law is unconstitutional...a ploy by the bigots to keep certain people out. Bigotry, straight up.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:02 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Jim Crow was law.
At least know what you oppose
Rob, I know it was law but it was also unconstitutional...
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:07 pm to Dale51
quote:I'm sure the bakers are challenging it
That law is unconstitutional.
quote:You're confused
a ploy by the bigots to keep certain people out. Bigotry, straight up.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:07 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
And when you refuse service on the basis of someone's sexuality,
so your argument is some discrimination is OK but other discrimination is n'OK?
reminds me of something....
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
It's not my argument, Slo. It's the state of Oregon's argument. 
I realize this board hates inconvenient facts and their messengers, though.
As I explained earlier, my argument would be all discrimination is OK by private business
I realize this board hates inconvenient facts and their messengers, though.
As I explained earlier, my argument would be all discrimination is OK by private business
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 4:14 pm
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News