re: If you have a subscription to Sports Illustrated this is the progressive trash you support

quote:

---

I can only assume some writer said something that was interpreted as approving violence against someone who doesn't fully embrace some sort of "trans agenda" , whatever that may be.

---

If you really want to know (I suspect you don't), I'll tell you.

Heck, I'll tell you anyway.

Last year Cunningham executed a similar foul against Jacey Sheldon, who now plays for the Chicago Sky. She did so because she has become the enforcer for Kaitlyn Clark, whom she is rumored to be more than friends and teammates with.

This year another member of the Sky fouled her back in a similar but more violent manner.

Cunningham has incidentally made statements that men shouldn't play women's sports. That almost certainly didn't have the least thing to do with the foul.

But SI's "journalist" who looks like a lesbian if not a trans woman in her official picture, went far out of her way to try to make the foul about Cunningham's common sense statements rather than just retaliation for the foul last year.

Which proves the underlying premise of SI's runaway bias.

quote:

---

But the idea that sports media in general has become overly "progressive"
and "woke" is absurd.

---

Is it? So the mainstream sports media came out en force against the NFL kneeling during the National Anthem?

Or the ridiculous messages of "End Racism" in end zones?

And then there's this: How the sports media has lurched leftward

It’s seems that with the two dudes trying to enter the WNBA draft next year, the higher ups will have to specifically define what the W in WNBA stands for. And if they decide that only biological women can compete, I suppose the higher ups will need to be physically attacked as well.

quote:

---

Genuinely would like to know why anyone would down vote this.

---

I'd guess there's at least handful of trannies here!

Who else would down vote it?