Started By
Message

re: If Romney had owned the 47% comments, how does it change the 2012 election?

Posted on 2/18/18 at 11:24 am to
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Obama was a stage managed candidate. And not the orator people said he was. He was no Bobby Kennedy. He was vulnerable.


Indeed, man Bobby Kennedy would have been a dream compared to Obama
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124202 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 11:32 am to
quote:

If Romney had owned the 47% comments, how does it change the 2012 election?
Four huge Romney Campaign Mistakes in order.

(1) Project Orca/GOTV - Flat out lost the election

(2) Backing down when Candy Crowley decided to enter the 2nd Debate as an active participant. Was weak and stupid. Nonetheless, it was the most corrupted network debate orchestration in POTUS debate history.

(3) Romney running away from his wealth.

(4) The 47%
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30133 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 11:46 am to
i think it was a slim chance he wins even before that, he was a total cuck and just like mccain, he didnt want to criticize or be negative, so he gave no one any real reason to vote for him other then he "called himself" a republican.

i wasnt voting for him because the last thing i wanted was a democrat light version rino that would govern just like whoever the democrat was.

so at that point, i came to the conclusion that what possible difference was there between the two choices? so was would be the point of even voting?

at least if it was a democrat president, then the mess they cause couldnt be blamed on publicans, even though the situation we found ourselves in was directly a result of RNC being completely taken over by prog filth rinos
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram