- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Ford just made up her story ...
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:09 pm to texridder
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:09 pm to texridder
quote:And they are all wrong.
But either way, the therapist would not have put the name of a third party in her notes except if his name was a necessary part of the patient history.
Do a google search. There are 20 therapists who have said this.
You put the names that individuals reference in all of your medical notes in case you are asked to present that information in a legal setting, or to at least recount exactly what was stated, ESPECIALLY in the case of sexual or physical abuse.
You do not make a statement applying guilt to the individual, but you absolutely put the patient’s statement in the note with the referenced name included.
Any physician who says anything differently is flat out lying to your face.
By including EXACTLY what was stated, usually via the use of quotations, you are protecting the patient in the case of them being unable to recall details and you are also protecting yourself as a physician.
What you posted is blatantly false.
And before you ask, those “20 psychiatrists” are flat out lying.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 4:14 pm
0
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:09 pm to texridder
quote:
She told the therapist that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
Hmmm.
Sounds like it’s not out of the realm of possibility that she DID write the same letter about Gorsuch.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:10 pm to texridder
I think she was a slutty girl and probably mixed up memories. GP guys don’t really hang out with Holton chicks. Holton chicks were “non-denomination”. GP is Catholic. Holton chicks hung out with the other non-denomination boys school Landon. Landon & GP are big rivals.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:10 pm to texridder
quote:
Kavanaugh won't be confirmed. Someone else will be nominated.
quote:
texridder
bookmarked filth
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:10 pm to texridder
quote:
why did she say there was a witness present? Why didn't she say it was just her and Kavanaugh alone
Who knows why and how lying loons lie. It's like asking why schizophrenics listen to the voices.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:11 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Not only is the only source of this happening coming from a supposed 2012 doctor visit, but that visit doesn’t even reference the one being accused.
Now how about answering the question in the OP?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:11 pm to texridder
quote:
Kavanaugh won't be confirmed. Someone else will be nominated.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:11 pm to texridder
quote:
Now how about answering the question in the OP?
you kick puppies and burn them.
I have a witness.
GUILTY.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:12 pm to texridder
quote:
why did she say there was a witness present? Why didn't she say it was just her and Kavanaugh alone?
And why did she say that the witness was Mark Judge, Kavanaugh's friend?
Without reading the last 6 pages -
Profiling people based off limited information available is somewhat in tune with what I do for a living, and let me just say that this happens ALL THE TIME (i.e. recalling people that were “there” but weren’t, recalling events totally different from how they happened, etc.).
It’s not only possible but almost likely at this point that she’s incorrect in her memory - not “LYING” or making it up out of thin air - because SHE believes she is telling the truth. It’s very common for our minds to “remake” memories, especially from so long ago, and especially to include someone who is “famous” or significant in some way that you may have known. The Mandela Effect partly plays into this, as well as other cognitive abilities our brains have to attach certain time periods in our lives to certain people, places, and things AFTER the fact.
For instance, I went to school with Darren McFadden and was somewhat friends with him. If you were to ask me to recall certain parties and events from that time period I’d most likely imagine him being there, even just as a peripheral guest in the background, whether he was or not.
This lady apparently ran in the same circles with him in their HS days and his career and influence have grown steadily since. She’s most likely followed his story even from a distance, as she “knew that guy growing up.” Now, add 36 years of memories coming and going into the mix, as well as alcohol involved during the event.
She was either so drunk that she imagined it was him doing this (I’ve been drunk before and imagined the person I was with was someone else, usually a crush at the time), or it was someone that somewhat looks like him when drunk, or she’s making it up all together (I don’t think this is the case, fyi). This same train of thought it was the professionals at the FBI believe as well, as they were taught similarly.
There, I answered your ridiculous question with my professional training and opinion; I spent probably WAY too much effort since you seem bound and determined to defend the lady no matter shameful the whole thing is.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:12 pm to texridder
quote:
Now how about answering the question in the OP?
How about addressing the numerous people that have addressed your OP, or your faulty logic? No?
How about this:
Why does the mere mention of a witness matter but the content of the witnesses statement doesn't?
Please address. Can't wait.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:13 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You still pretending to be a lawyer on here? If you were, this beaut of a post should end that speculation for everyone else.
Why don't you explain to everyone why that is so. Here's your big chance.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:13 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Why does the mere mention of a witness matter but the content of the witnesses statement doesn't?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:14 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Wait, his name wasn’t even given to the therapist in 2012? I thought that is where his name came from.
It was not. It was merely “people who became important people.” It’s classic delusional stuff. “And then aliens came down and probed my butthole.”
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You still pretending to be a lawyer on here? If you were, this beaut of a post should end that speculation for everyone else.
In fairness, for her other alters she pretends to be other professions and she’s equally as stupid on those handles.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:15 pm to Vacherie Saint
I agree. That was my point. Judge is low hanging fruit if you are constructing a lie. He is already on record as saying there was lots of debauchery in his high school, so when he inevitably denies this specific allegation, the left says he's clearly lying to protect his buddy. If he's asked the pointed questions about whether the things he wrote in his book really happened, he either admits he fabricated it or he says yes, those things happened (but they didn't involve Kavanaugh), and it lends some comfort to those who want to believe Ford despite the lack of evidence for this specific episode.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:17 pm to texridder
You're a lawyer. You have 1 witness for your client. That witness does not corroborate your client's story. In fact, that one witness completely denies your client's version of events. Does that witness help or hurt your client's story?
Please advise.
Please advise.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:18 pm to texridder
quote:I already did previously in the thread.
Now how about answering the question in the OP?
It lended credence to her story and puts her in a sympathetic light as being a female vs 2 males during a me too situation.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:18 pm to texridder
quote:
She told the therapist that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
Ford's husband said she gave his name to the therapist in a follow-up session about a year after the first session. (which I'm sure you don't care about). But either way, the therapist would not have put the name of a third party in her notes except if his name was a necessary part of the patient history.
Do a google search. There are 20 therapists who have said this.
Therapists aren’t there to question their clients and dig deeper, they’re there to hear what’s on the clients mind whether completely asinine or horrific. The fact that it’s in their notes means nothing other than Ford told the therapist it was on her mind. It literally proves nothing of value, other than Ford has believed this since at least that time.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:19 pm to roadGator
quote:
He should be ridiculed until he stays at DU where his stupid question came from.
Why don't you go on DU and see if it is posted there?
What difference does that make? That would make you feel better? Too bad, you'll be disappointed.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 4:20 pm to texridder
Please address my points. K. I'll wait.
Page 8 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News