- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:22 pm to texridder
It is amazing how ALL IN you are on this.
I have a feeling you will regret this.
I have a feeling you will regret this.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:22 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:Inconsistencies don’t matter.
She said there were 4 boys in the room. Then she said it was 2. Now there was a girl at the house. How are you sure which of these statements is true?
It happened at some place, at some time, in some year, not sure in any of those details, but it happened at and during them.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:23 pm to texridder
quote:
why did she say there was a witness present? Why didn't she say it was just her and Kavanaugh alone?
A better question is why wasn't this relevant when Brett Kavanagh was appointed to the DC Circuit? Why is her allegation so vague? Why wasn't his name given to the therapist in 2012? Why has everyone this woman has named as a witness denied this event happened? Why does she have a Clinton lackey as a lawyer? Who paid for her lie detector? Who paid for her lawyer? What do her bank records look like in the past 120 days? Why has almost every woman in Kavanagh's past come out in support of him?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:23 pm to texridder
So you're coming at the angle of "her story is completely baseless and full of holes, no one would make something like that up"?
Only in the eyes of a delusional sky screamer would a lack of evidence be seen as evidence itself.
Only in the eyes of a delusional sky screamer would a lack of evidence be seen as evidence itself.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:23 pm to Scruffy
Truth is less important than the pain she is expressing. We can all agree on that, right?
- left nuts -
- left nuts -
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:24 pm to texridder
I am curious about the bed. She stated that the 3rd person in the room jumped onto the bed and all 3 rolled onto the floor allowing her to escape. Trampoline?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:24 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:Wait, his name wasn’t even given to the therapist in 2012?
Why wasn't his name given to the therapist in 2012?
I thought that is where his name came from.
Are you shitting me?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:25 pm to texridder
I'll bite:
Because naming a "witness" would appear to make her story more believable.
It probably took a cursory review of a yearbook or conversations with people who knew Kavanaugh in high school to figure out who he was friends with. Then you go through the names and find someone who doesn't appear to be very trustworthy and name him. Hope that he either hates Trump and wants to play along or will come across as untrustworthy and, at best, be neutral.
Liars usually provide more information than necessary, but since she couldn't pigeonhole herself on location, date, or any other concrete facts, she could provide a "witness".
Because naming a "witness" would appear to make her story more believable.
It probably took a cursory review of a yearbook or conversations with people who knew Kavanaugh in high school to figure out who he was friends with. Then you go through the names and find someone who doesn't appear to be very trustworthy and name him. Hope that he either hates Trump and wants to play along or will come across as untrustworthy and, at best, be neutral.
Liars usually provide more information than necessary, but since she couldn't pigeonhole herself on location, date, or any other concrete facts, she could provide a "witness".
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:25 pm to texridder
quote:
why did she say there was a witness present? Why didn't she say it was just her and Kavanaugh alone?
It is insane that she would say someone else was present, because it completely ruins her entire narrative of no one knowing about it until 2012
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:25 pm to texridder
quote:
Mark Judge
How can she remember either of their names when she cannot remember where this happened?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:25 pm to Scruffy
The therapist's notes don't even mention him.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:26 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
quote:
How does he know that he has no knowledge of the party in question when he doesn't know where the party was, or when the party occurred.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:26 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I assume it's because it was so long ago that even the witness wouldn't remember, especially if they were drunk.
Why would she possibly want the witnesses not to remember?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:26 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
The therapist's notes don't even mention him.
and also indicate an "inaccurate" number of others there
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:26 pm to texridder
quote:
Why would she possibly want the witnesses not to remember?
Because it didn't happen
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:27 pm to Damone
Texridder refuses to answer when some one asks him but I will ask again - what is he thinking will be accomplished by this attempt to ruin a man's life? ALso, does he think this supreme court seat wont be filled?
I don't think a loon like texridder is ready for the Barrett pain train but it is coming after this smear campaign.
I don't think a loon like texridder is ready for the Barrett pain train but it is coming after this smear campaign.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:27 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:All great questions! I'll add another - Why was her ENTIRE social media footprint scrubbed prior to her name being released??
A better question is why wasn't this relevant when Brett Kavanagh was appointed to the DC Circuit? Why is her allegation so vague? Why wasn't his name given to the therapist in 2012? Why has everyone this woman has named as a witness denied this event happened? Why does she have a Clinton lackey as a lawyer? Who paid for her lie detector? Who paid for her lawyer? What do her bank records look like in the past 120 days? Why has almost every woman in Kavanagh's past come out in support of him?
Let me answer that one for you too. Because her comments and affiliations would be damaging to her credibility. What is she hiding??
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:27 pm to texridder
quote:
Why would she possibly want the witnesses not to remember?
Because since the event never occurred, having someone not remember is as good as she could hope for.
Popular
Back to top


0









