
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ice Shooting In Austin - Democrats are ALREADY attacking.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:22 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:22 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Is there any dispute with the ABC headline?
One thing for certain is that you would never dispute it ....
Keep dancing...you are now up to 12 pages
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:29 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Wooooooooow.
So he was actually dumb enough to carry through on a defund the police program.
AND these morons voted him up the ladder.
Woooooooow.
Goog info, thanks Bobby!
So he was actually dumb enough to carry through on a defund the police program.
AND these morons voted him up the ladder.
Woooooooow.
Goog info, thanks Bobby!
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:30 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Looks like we have some waiting to do.
Dunno how much they're going to tell us.
Dunno how much they're going to tell us.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:34 pm to hogcard1964
[quote]Yes, you can't make anything out and have no idea what happened. Neither do I. [quote]
You must be watching a different video than I have seen.
You must be watching a different video than I have seen.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:36 pm to IvoryBillMatt
You keep doing what you do.
Stupid frick.
You have no idea of what you speak of.
Stupid frick.
You have no idea of what you speak of.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:51 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
Looks like we have some waiting to do.
Dunno how much they're going to tell us.
I don't think they will tell us anything. They REALLY want Perez gone, because he would be a material witness to the shooting.
Plus, despite DHS's assertion that Perez entered the US illegally, he entered legally under Biden's then legal (awful) CBP One program. According to his attorneys, he missed an immigration hearing because notice went to the wrong address.
From the perspective of DHS, all of this goes away when Perez is deported. Unless and until his lawyers file for a stay of removal, Perez could be deported at any time to Venezuela...a country whose leaders we own.
If his lawyers don't file for a stay, I expect Perez to be deported before the end of the week.
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:58 pm to IndianPower
quote:
You keep doing what you do.
Stupid frick.
You have no idea of what you speak of.
I'm always willing to learn, especially from law enforcement. Please correct any thing I got wrong, Chief.
You still haven't answered my question. Do you agree that Tennessee v. Garner eliminated the fleeing felon doctrine?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:00 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
One thing for certain is that you would never dispute it ....
I used to respect your adherence to the facts. What was incorrect about the ABC headline?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:04 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Must be
Fair enough:)
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:58 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Lol you started this shite thread with a bad really bad because they haven't released anything within minutes you jerk off
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:14 pm to Jbird
quote:
Lol you started this shite thread with a bad really bad because they haven't released anything within minutes you jerk off
Of course, it wasn't minutes. It's now well over a day.
There have been 20 or so DHS shootings since 2025. 6 of them were fatal. Not one of those shootings has resulted in any extensive report from the Feds on what happened.
It's amusing that so many here think there will be some kind of DHS report on what "really happened." It's not going to happen.
Maybe it's a strategy: "we might just shoot any illegal...better deport now." I can respect that. Biden let in MILLIONS who shouldn't be here...including Perez.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:This is a big issue with Biden admin illegals.
Plus, despite DHS's assertion that Perez entered the US illegally, he entered legally under Biden's then legal (awful) CBP One program. According to his attorneys, he missed an immigration hearing because notice went to the wrong address.
There's a whole slew of addresses that they use. And almost none of them legit. And under Biden admin, none of them were held responsible for not showing up to their court hearings.
I dunno about immigration. But on probation and parole, changes of address not corrected or updated is a violation. The Internet says that it's a violation.
I dunno. The way the left is, I don't think this goes away quick. They may start clamoring for statues of him.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 7:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
YOU tell US where YOUR fleeing with no weapon was at the time of the press release.
I am retired.
I can tell you the case law.
You are fricking stupid.
Stop trying to feed the fire.
I am retired.
I can tell you the case law.
You are fricking stupid.
Stop trying to feed the fire.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:10 pm to IndianPower
quote:
YOU tell US where YOUR fleeing with no weapon was at the time of the press release.
I have no idea what you are trying to say here.
Can you rephrase it so we can try to understand?
quote:
I am retired.
Relevance?
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:19 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
dunno. The way the left is, I don't think this goes away quick.
I don't think Perez will stick around long enough for statues. His lawyers are NOT challenging the final removal order, instead....
"Kristin Etter, another Austin immigration attorney representing Garces Perez, filed a request for his release and to block his deportation in a federal court in San Antonio on Monday.
Etter wrote in the court documents that her client is not disputing the final removal order but wants a chance to apply for a U-visa, a type of immigration status for victims and witnesses of a crime. Etter also wrote that because the shooting is now being investigated as a potential crime, he has the right to apply for a U visa."
Texas Tribune - Austin Shooting
I didn't practice immigration law, but this seems like a doomed legal strategy. A court is unlikely to try to MAKE the Secretary of State issue a visa.
I still think Perez is deported by Saturday.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:23 pm to IndianPower
LOL!
I will let you figure it out, Chief.
I will let you figure it out, Chief.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 8:48 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
Can you rephrase it so we can try to understand?
Allow me: "I can't answer the question posed about Tennessee v Garner because that would mean that law enforcement cannot shoot someone who has committed a crime but is only fleeing capture. Instead, I will lash out at Matt. Call HIM stupid and pretend he's on the side of an illegal alien."
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:37 am to IvoryBillMatt
If they can find a doctor that will sign off on him being fit for travel.
I don't know if that filing that you were talking about could delay his departure or not.
If it can, it can delay until after the federal investigation ends.
Another reason I want that shot down, is so others don't claim to be witnesses to a crime.
I haven't studied very much of immigration law. And it seems like the activist judges will just disregard what doesn't serve their ends, like they have been.
With this, and everything else.
I don't know if that filing that you were talking about could delay his departure or not.
If it can, it can delay until after the federal investigation ends.
Another reason I want that shot down, is so others don't claim to be witnesses to a crime.
I haven't studied very much of immigration law. And it seems like the activist judges will just disregard what doesn't serve their ends, like they have been.
With this, and everything else.
quote:
don't think Perez will stick around long enough for statues. His lawyers are NOT challenging the final removal order, instead....
"Kristin Etter, another Austin immigration attorney representing Garces Perez, filed a request for his release and to block his deportation in a federal court in San Antonio on Monday.
Etter wrote in the court documents that her client is not disputing the final removal order but wants a chance to apply for a U-visa, a type of immigration status for victims and witnesses of a crime. Etter also wrote that because the shooting is now being investigated as a potential crime, he has the right to apply for a U visa."
Texas Tribune - Austin Shooting
I didn't practice immigration law, but this seems like a doomed legal strategy. A court is unlikely to try to MAKE the Secretary of State issue a visa.
I still think Perez is deported by Saturday.

Popular
Back to top


1





