
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ice Shooting In Austin - Democrats are ALREADY attacking.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
He's walking after being shot in the upper spine

Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:21 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Never said you were. Just pointing out what democrats are doing.
You're right. I apologize. I confused you with someone else.
I agree completely that the Dem strategy was to swamp us with bogus asylum claims...which would take years to decide.
I STILL don't know why Trump hasn't temporarily hired/deputized 100,000 favorable immigration judges to clear out the backlog. Makes no sense.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:24 pm to ArHog
quote:
He's walking after being shot in the upper spine
Yeah I agree. That's why I pointed it out. ICE said it was a shooting. Could that just be a fragment of something?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:27 pm to Jbird
quote:
employee rights
What are you referring to, here?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:27 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I STILL don't know why Trump hasn't temporarily hired/deputized 100,000 favorable immigration judges to clear out the backlog. Makes no sense.
I think he's just skipping that part and moving straight to deportation because they shouldn't have been let in to begin with. That said, I don't know for sure. I do know dems have been screaming for due process for foreign law breakers though, so I have to assume Trump is, to some degree, just skipping the asylum hearings.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:27 pm to The Torch
frick Wilber.
Door Dash needs to answer some questions.
Door Dash needs to answer some questions.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:27 pm to Jbird
quote:
Ivory wants disclosure regardless of employee rights.
With all the crazies, I don't have a problem not knowing the identities of the ICE agents.
SOME explanation of why Perez was shot would be really helpful. The longer DHS waits, the more the Dems will have an uncontradicted story.
Are there any facts to justify the shooting?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:30 pm to Azkiger
quote:
I think he's just skipping that part and moving straight to deportation because they shouldn't have been let in to begin with.
Cheers.
You might be right in terms of sheer volume. It takes money to hire lawyers to fight deportation. Probably the vast majority of asylum seekers can't afford attorneys.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:31 pm to CR4090
quote:
Door Dash needs to answer some questions.
He had a legal work permit. He was an asylum seeker.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:31 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
fragment of something?
AI is the something
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I never saw anyone in imminent danger from Perez's vehicle. I saw a stationary Toyota facing the opposite way from an unmarked SUV. BEFORE the Toyota moves, you hear gunshots. The whole time you can see the front of the Toyota. No one is in front of it at any time. ICE admits this was an "officer involved shooting." There are no claims or evidence that Perez was armed or that anyone other than ICE shot him. You don't SEE the passenger side ICE agent exit, but there are two bullet holes in the rear passenger window of the Toyota. It's a safe inference that the passenger side ICE agent shot Perez through that back window. But...I guess it's possible that the driver both shot Perez AND ran around to the driver side of Perez's vehicle. Here's a photo of Perez's wound in the back (seems minor?). His vehicle was never going in reverse. There is nothing shown yet to show how Perez could have been a threat to anyone.
Agreed. Does not look like a Good shoot.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:34 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I never saw anyone in imminent danger from Perez's vehicle.
I saw a stationary Toyota facing the opposite way from an unmarked SUV. BEFORE the Toyota moves, you hear gunshots. The whole time you can see the front of the Toyota. No one is in front of it at any time.
You can't see anything in the video that was released. Nobody can.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:39 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
You can't see anything in the video that was released. Nobody can.
ANYTHING? You see Perez's car STATIONARY, pointed AWAY from the ICE vehicle. You hear gunshots, THEN Perez's vehicle rolls slowly forward a few feet.
Most important, you don't see anyone in front of Perez's vehicle. Again, maybe there was something BEFORE the video that justified the shooting. It's telling that not even ICE has claimed anything to justify the shooting.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:42 pm to ArHog
quote:
AI is the something
Now you're just reaching for anything.
Here's the YouTube video of ABC's reporting. Check out the 35 second mark:
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:49 pm to ArHog
quote:
He's walking after being shot in the upper spine
Answer to the spine question. The bullet missed his spine. It's too close to the spine to remove.
"He was transported to Dell Seton Medical Center, where staff told him they weren’t going to remove the bullet because it was too close to his spine, Garces Perez said in the call from the South Texas ICE Processing Center in Pearsall."
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:05 pm to Jbird
quote:
Naw you want shite released will nilly
You dgaf about employee rights
You don't gaf about allowing oversight to happen.
You are in fact an alter.
Who are you to tell me who I am and what I think? It gets so tedious.
-I said the identities of the agents shouldn't be released.
-I'm not asking willy nilly. Over 24 hours is a LONG time for DHS not to make a preliminary statement about the basic facts that they know.
-DHS is getting boat raced in the information race.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:08 pm to Jbird
quote:
SEEMS!
If I know something, I say that. If I am speculating, I indicate that. What's your problem with that?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:08 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
ABC's reporting
Their headline
ICE Officer shoots and injures delivery driver
His attorney
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:13 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Yes, you can't make anything out and have no idea what happened. Neither do I.
But I do hope they riot and burn that city down.
But I do hope they riot and burn that city down.
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:19 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Their headline
ICE Officer shoots and injures delivery driver
His attorney
Is there any dispute with the ABC headline? DHS said it was an officer involved shooting and that Perez was treated for his wound and is in stable condition. Doordash confirmed that Perez was delivering for them when the incident occurred.
From that undated post, the attorney sure seems like an awful person. Has she lied about the Perez shooting?

Popular
Back to top


2






