Started By
Message

re: I don’t understand the Acosta ruling

Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:17 pm to
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:17 pm to
Dp
This post was edited on 11/24/18 at 9:18 pm
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Come on, man. You know it, I know it. He obviously didn't assault that intern. Just leave it be.




If there is one thing Progressives absolutely cannot handle it is being held to their own created rules.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48917 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:20 pm to
#hertruth
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

You admitted the judge evaluated the evidence he believes the White House used without that evidence being submitted to the court, or with any analysis of that evidence provided to the court. He used his understanding of the reporting on the issue. Or more specifically he used fake news to substantiate his ruling.
I did nothing of the sort. You have a vivid imagination.

Like Josh, I would love to see the actual transcript.

Are you actually so naive as to think that Sanders' tweet was not offered into evidence by CNN and admitted by the Court?


If Trump claimed that Acosta beat the girl senseless with the microphone, you people would insist that it was absolutely true. There is no arguing with that level of delusion.
This post was edited on 11/24/18 at 9:25 pm
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:27 pm to
Where is Alyssa Milano screaming at Acosta in his office hallway through a human microphone about how she can't sleep at night because of the forced donkey punch she experienced 30 years ago?

Where is the overwhelming attack from the Democrats on Acosta about how any small attack on women is an attack on all women?

The fricking hypocrisy of these people is sickeningly insane.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Are you actually so naive as to think that Sanders' tweet was not offered into evidence by CNN and admitted by the Court


I'm not assuming either way. I posed that very question. But how on earth would the judge be qualified to evaluate the compression of the video without expert opinion. Also, the president and SHS were present live, so the video wasn't required to know Acosta struck that woman.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

nothing of the sort. You have a vivid imagination.


Now you're just lying.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

There is no arguing with that level of delusion.


If you're tired of getting your face beat in, run along.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

If you're tired of getting your face beat in, run along.
Good Lord, you actually think that you are getting the better of this discussion.

Like I said ... utter delusion.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Acosta inadvertently brushed the arm of a female staffer who was reaching across his body."


I'll quote again for posterity and the lulz.
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:34 pm to
quote:


If Trump claimed that Acosta beat the girl senseless with the microphone, you people would insist that it was absolutely true.

Literally everyone saw the video of an adult male journalists being an unprofessional a-hole. Thstd a fact.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Literally everyone saw the video of an adult male journalists being an unprofessional a-hole. Thstd a fact.
Absolutely. I have said REPEATEDLY that Acosta was acting like an arse by declining to yield the floor and refusing to surrender the mic.
This post was edited on 11/24/18 at 9:37 pm
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

have said REPEATEDLY that Acosta was acting like an arse by declining to yield the floor and refusing to surrender the mic.


And he struck that woman
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27067 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:37 pm to
Odd that everyone is fighting over gifs. I actually find the sound interesting and relevant:

LINK
This post was edited on 11/24/18 at 9:41 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

I'll quote again for posterity and the lulz.
I will say it AGAIN for you, because it is EXACTLY what happened.
quote:

"Acosta inadvertently brushed the arm of a female staffer who was reaching across his body."
If you were not such blind partisans, you Trumpettes would see it, too.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

Odd that everyone is fighting over gifs. I actually find the sound interesting and relevant
"Pardon me, ma'am" in a very polite tone. EXACTLY what I would say, if I inadvertently brushed against someone.

What a vicious attack.
This post was edited on 11/24/18 at 9:48 pm
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3116 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

"Pardon me, ma'am" in a very polite tone. EXACTLY what I would say, if I inadvertently brushed against someone.

I would say this too if it was inadvertent, but my interpretation is that he said it while intentionally brushing her away.

I would have kicked his a$$ out months ago just for being an arsehole.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

Let's have a look at the video at ACTUAL speed, and WITHOUT the cleverly-selected "repeat point


Yeah....and?
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14190 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

And he struck that woman
And that's why the White House released the sped-up video WITHOUT the audio, because they were confident the regular speed video WITH audio, would confirm their position.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23183 posts
Posted on 11/24/18 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

And that's why the White House released the sped-up video WITHOUT the audio, because they were confident the regular speed video WITH audio, would confirm their position


This is hank level stupid
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram