- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I can't wait until the Republican presidential debates
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:15 pm to Tactical1
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:15 pm to Tactical1
quote:
There is probably 70 other things you should listen to them debate about before wondering what their stance on evolution is.
And yet when they are interviewed, guess what the "go to" question from the "impartial, objective" interviewer is?
2
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:15 pm to TheFinalWord
Good to know that you will be tuning in with an open mind to ascertain who may he the best leader for our country. Life must be very simple for you.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:16 pm to TheFinalWord
This post was edited on 9/30/14 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:16 pm to FT
quote:Hey, I don't suffer from it. I'm just an a-hole.
Hm...
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:16 pm to Scruffy
I can't wait until the next Civil War when it will be open season on liberals and enemies of the state.
This "I can't wait..." game is fun.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:17 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Hey, I suffer from it.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:17 pm to TheFinalWord
quote:You "could not" care less about your education though obviously.
I could care less about my thread starting abilities,
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:18 pm to Chimlim
quote:You have to understand, many individuals latch onto certain words with the belief that, by throwing them around in public, they will be viewed as more intelligent than they actually are.
What does one's belief about evolution have to do with being President? Are you really that dumb to use that as a criteria for voting?
It is the basis for the smug characterization that fits many of these individuals.
"Science, evolution, etc.," are all examples. People use them with very little understanding of what they are actually saying.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:20 pm to Scruffy
I do have an issue with a candidate denying evolution. It's not an absolute part of a litmus test, but I do question the education and intellect of someone who denies evolution.
I think in most cases, they know that evolution is a fact, but can't say that if they want to win their base. Which speaks a whole lot to one side's base.
Granted, there are retarded issues Democrats are supposed to support for their base to like them, too. It's very much a two way street.
I think in most cases, they know that evolution is a fact, but can't say that if they want to win their base. Which speaks a whole lot to one side's base.
Granted, there are retarded issues Democrats are supposed to support for their base to like them, too. It's very much a two way street.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:20 pm to FT
quote:
Hey, I suffer from it.
The first step is acceptance.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:21 pm to Scruffy
quote:They then destroy the view of themselves as being intelligent by saying "they could care less".
You have to understand, many individuals latch onto certain words with the belief that, by throwing them around in public, they will be viewed as more intelligent than they actually are
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:23 pm to CamdenTiger
Aside from the lack of substance from the OP, you gotta admit, the GOP primaries/candidates for Prez are entertaining and must-see-TV:
--2008 capped it off by giving us the chicken hawk himself, John McCain, and, in a desperate attempt to woo women voters chaffing from Hillary's loss, the legendary Sarah Palin. From her 'nails on chalkboard' screech-talk, to her complete cluelessness on everything political, this gal gave SNL more satire pieces than they could ever wet dream.
--2012 was no slouch either. It started off with Herman Cain's '999' plan. Then came Newt with $2.50 gas. Not to be out done, Michelle 'Crazy-Eyes' Bachman threw her brain, err, hat into the fray(does anyone remember her 'Tea Party Response' to the SOTU address where she seemed to be staring at the ceiling?)The Aggies gave us Rick Perry and his stroke-like response to every question. And who could forget the Donald? Whether he intended to be a serious candidate or not, his 'money ultimatums' to the President, his search for the truth about the birthing process and how it is documented, and his mouth in general, was priceless.
The peanut gallery for 2016 is certainly shaping up to be promising. We have what is shaping up to be a certifiable nut in Ben Carson. The Pauls have been beating the war drums for some time now. Ted Cruz is in. If we could get a few more laughs in this next cycle, it wouldn't hurt a bit
--2008 capped it off by giving us the chicken hawk himself, John McCain, and, in a desperate attempt to woo women voters chaffing from Hillary's loss, the legendary Sarah Palin. From her 'nails on chalkboard' screech-talk, to her complete cluelessness on everything political, this gal gave SNL more satire pieces than they could ever wet dream.
--2012 was no slouch either. It started off with Herman Cain's '999' plan. Then came Newt with $2.50 gas. Not to be out done, Michelle 'Crazy-Eyes' Bachman threw her brain, err, hat into the fray(does anyone remember her 'Tea Party Response' to the SOTU address where she seemed to be staring at the ceiling?)The Aggies gave us Rick Perry and his stroke-like response to every question. And who could forget the Donald? Whether he intended to be a serious candidate or not, his 'money ultimatums' to the President, his search for the truth about the birthing process and how it is documented, and his mouth in general, was priceless.
The peanut gallery for 2016 is certainly shaping up to be promising. We have what is shaping up to be a certifiable nut in Ben Carson. The Pauls have been beating the war drums for some time now. Ted Cruz is in. If we could get a few more laughs in this next cycle, it wouldn't hurt a bit
This post was edited on 9/30/14 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:23 pm to FT
quote:Sure. To each their own. As long as they don't let their personal beliefs on that matter impact aspects of research or policy decisions, I have no issues with whatever their stance is.
I do have an issue with a candidate denying evolution. It's not an absolute part of a litmus test, but I do question the education and intellect of someone who denies evolution.
quote:As everything seems to be.
Granted, there are retarded issues Democrats are supposed to support for their base to like them, too. It's very much a two way street.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:25 pm to EthanL
quote:
EthanL
The party of Uncle Joe and Elizabeth Warren is trying to laugh at the other side.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:26 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
And yet when they are interviewed, guess what the "go to" question from the "impartial, objective" interviewer is?
Are we talking interview or debate?
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:28 pm to TheFinalWord
Excellent thread. Would read again.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:29 pm to Tactical1
quote:
Are we talking interview or debate?
Quite frankly, both.
Democrat candidate who believes in evolution will never be asked whether they believe in evolution (duh).
Republican candidate who believes in creation will absolutely be asked whether they believe in creation (absolute imbecile).
It is the litmus test of the Left and (to a lesser extent) the Right as well.
Creationism = Unintelligent
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:32 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Democrat candidate who believes in evolution will never be asked whether they believe in evolution (duh).
Republican candidate who believes in creation will absolutely be asked whether they believe in creation (absolute imbecile).
I think you want to believe this.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:34 pm to TheFinalWord
I can't wait for the democrat debates. 10 assholes, most who don't believe their own citizens are smart enough to obtain ID's or care for themselves.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:35 pm to TheFinalWord
quote:
I can't wait until the Republican presidential debates
10 or so assholes, most of whom don't believe in evolution!
Dude you're no better than than the folks who start all the threads with titles like "Question for Libs" or use terms like "libtards".
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News