- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I don't understand why we can't have a civil discussion on this topic. I think it is quite interesting.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:21 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
What the hell is your deal?
Let me take this one.
Your threads border on the insane most of the time.
You have lost touch with reality...people should have to own property to vote...it doesn't make you look like a terrible person...just an elite dickwad.
If you are against democracy...and clearly you are...North Korea has visas for Americans like you.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:21 pm to Scruffy
I made a joke in another thread about landrieu's French ancestry helping her in the election, and it sent cwill into a frenzy.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:22 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
There is a very common belief that the more suffrage and voting there is, the better everything is. I tend to disagree. Let me defend myself by saying that if law and government, in present times, were actually kept in their traditional confines of protecting natural rights to life, liberty, and property, then I would be fine with mass voting. The problem though, is that the primary function of government these days is monetary transfer from one group to another in the form of benefits (pork, programs, etc). Because this is the current, unfortunate primary function of the state, it means that the more people that vote, the more interests there are in the picture, trying to claw and fight for the scarce resources that the government transfers from peter to Paul.
Someone in a recent thread said that he thinks a balanced budget is impossible. And I agree, for the reason I listed above.
You can call me a terrible person all you want, but mass suffrage and voting, combined with a government whose primary function is not protection of rights, but transferring of wealth, gets you to Bastiat's spot on definition of government:
Government is that great fiction, where everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else
I've felt this way for quite some time. Maybe everyone should have a vote and you would get and additional vote for every $20k in federal taxes you pay.
Only property owners should have the right to vote on tax increases as well.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:22 pm to Scruffy
quote:
I don't understand why we can't have a civil discussion on this topic. I think it is quite interesting
I agree. I also think its pretty important.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:22 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is why I support a litmus test for all voters to be allowed to vote. You have to answer a 20 question test 70 percent correct to vote that year...do it on a computer screen in poll booth. 10 basic questions on how our Govt operates and 5 questions about the main stances of each candidate.
If you can't take the time to be informed of the basics then you don't deserve to vote because you don't really care
If you can't take the time to be informed of the basics then you don't deserve to vote because you don't really care
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:23 pm to asurob1
I never, ever said that only property owners should vote. That was 1987 who made that claim in a response
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:23 pm to Pinecone Repair
quote:I don't think it is important or unimportant. I just find it interesting.
I agree. I also think its pretty important.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:23 pm to ruzil
quote:
I've felt this way for quite some time. Maybe everyone should have a vote and you would get and additional vote for every $20k in federal taxes you pay.
Nothing could go wrong with this plan...
I'll give you this Michigan...you know how to get all the loons out with your threads.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I respect your position and encourage you to back up your beliefs by no longer voting.
Problem solved.
Problem solved.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:25 pm to asurob1
Yea, I don't believe in using money or wealth to determine value in voting.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:27 pm to asurob1
quote:
asurob1
Stop picking on Michigan, and answer the question in the other thread, pussy.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:28 pm to Scruffy
Really?
I think it will be examined by future civilizations as one of the reasons that the U.S. fell.
I think it will be examined by future civilizations as one of the reasons that the U.S. fell.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:28 pm to deltaland
quote:
This is why I support a litmus test for all voters to be allowed to vote. You have to answer a 20 question test 70 percent correct to vote that year...do it on a computer screen in poll booth. 10 basic questions on how our Govt operates and 5 questions about the main stances of each candidate.
How would anyone ever get elected in the state of Mississippi?
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:29 pm to Vegas Bengal
Pay taxes = get to vote
don't pay taxes = don't get to vote
pretty simple really
don't pay taxes = don't get to vote
pretty simple really
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:30 pm to Vegas Bengal
I don't vote myself money taken from others. I vote for candidates who do their best to mitigate legal plunder. Jerry brown has gone against his party and has cut spending. He gets my vote. The problem is someone like rex, who votes himself tax subsidies for health insurance, knowing damn well it has to be taken first.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:31 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
How would anyone ever get elected in the state of Mississippi?
Perhaps there shouldn't be
This post was edited on 9/19/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:32 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
I don't vote myself money taken from others. I vote for candidates who do their best to mitigate legal plunder
Too many people do the exact opposite. Will eventually lead to ruin.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News