Started By
Message

re: I am going to look like a terrible person for saying this (regarding suffrage)

Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69492 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:18 pm to
Care to explain why?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69957 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72421 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:20 pm to
I don't understand why we can't have a civil discussion on this topic. I think it is quite interesting.

Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

What the hell is your deal?


Let me take this one.

Your threads border on the insane most of the time.

You have lost touch with reality...people should have to own property to vote...it doesn't make you look like a terrible person...just an elite dickwad.

If you are against democracy...and clearly you are...North Korea has visas for Americans like you.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69492 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:21 pm to
I made a joke in another thread about landrieu's French ancestry helping her in the election, and it sent cwill into a frenzy.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16984 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

There is a very common belief that the more suffrage and voting there is, the better everything is. I tend to disagree. Let me defend myself by saying that if law and government, in present times, were actually kept in their traditional confines of protecting natural rights to life, liberty, and property, then I would be fine with mass voting. The problem though, is that the primary function of government these days is monetary transfer from one group to another in the form of benefits (pork, programs, etc). Because this is the current, unfortunate primary function of the state, it means that the more people that vote, the more interests there are in the picture, trying to claw and fight for the scarce resources that the government transfers from peter to Paul.

Someone in a recent thread said that he thinks a balanced budget is impossible. And I agree, for the reason I listed above.

You can call me a terrible person all you want, but mass suffrage and voting, combined with a government whose primary function is not protection of rights, but transferring of wealth, gets you to Bastiat's spot on definition of government:

Government is that great fiction, where everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else



I've felt this way for quite some time. Maybe everyone should have a vote and you would get and additional vote for every $20k in federal taxes you pay.

Only property owners should have the right to vote on tax increases as well.
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

I don't understand why we can't have a civil discussion on this topic. I think it is quite interesting


I agree. I also think its pretty important.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91240 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:22 pm to
This is why I support a litmus test for all voters to be allowed to vote. You have to answer a 20 question test 70 percent correct to vote that year...do it on a computer screen in poll booth. 10 basic questions on how our Govt operates and 5 questions about the main stances of each candidate.

If you can't take the time to be informed of the basics then you don't deserve to vote because you don't really care
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69492 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:23 pm to
I never, ever said that only property owners should vote. That was 1987 who made that claim in a response
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72421 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I agree. I also think its pretty important.
I don't think it is important or unimportant. I just find it interesting.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I've felt this way for quite some time. Maybe everyone should have a vote and you would get and additional vote for every $20k in federal taxes you pay.




Nothing could go wrong with this plan...

I'll give you this Michigan...you know how to get all the loons out with your threads.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:24 pm to
I respect your position and encourage you to back up your beliefs by no longer voting.

Problem solved.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72421 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:25 pm to
Yea, I don't believe in using money or wealth to determine value in voting.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69957 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

asurob1



Stop picking on Michigan, and answer the question in the other thread, pussy.
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:28 pm to
Really?
I think it will be examined by future civilizations as one of the reasons that the U.S. fell.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

This is why I support a litmus test for all voters to be allowed to vote. You have to answer a 20 question test 70 percent correct to vote that year...do it on a computer screen in poll booth. 10 basic questions on how our Govt operates and 5 questions about the main stances of each candidate.


How would anyone ever get elected in the state of Mississippi?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30190 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:29 pm to
Pay taxes = get to vote
don't pay taxes = don't get to vote

pretty simple really
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69492 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:30 pm to
I don't vote myself money taken from others. I vote for candidates who do their best to mitigate legal plunder. Jerry brown has gone against his party and has cut spending. He gets my vote. The problem is someone like rex, who votes himself tax subsidies for health insurance, knowing damn well it has to be taken first.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64691 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

How would anyone ever get elected in the state of Mississippi?


Perhaps there shouldn't be
This post was edited on 9/19/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 9/19/14 at 3:32 pm to
quote:


I don't vote myself money taken from others. I vote for candidates who do their best to mitigate legal plunder




Too many people do the exact opposite. Will eventually lead to ruin.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram