Started By
Message

re: I agree that a Special Prosecutor SHOULD be appointed..TODAY.

Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:33 am to
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80459 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:33 am to
Nah, what Ted kennedy did is absolutely seditious and should certainly be a part of his legacy.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23782 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:39 am to
There has to be a crime for there to be charges.
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5864 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:41 am to
How did that work out for Ted Kennedy?

It not just leaks in Trumps house, but it is also leaks in Obama's admin. Government officials were hacked by Wikileaks during the campaign. Some of the members of the DNC are government officials.

I agree that there should be a investigation into all the leaks.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:46 am to
quote:

So when it was Hillary on the line it was about the actual leaks themselves not the leakers.

But now it's not about the actual leaks...




You REALLY can't see the difference between politicized federal employees conducting secret investigations and leaking classified information to their "friends" in the press, and foreigners hacking into private e-mail accounts and finally providing the Democrats the transparency they always promise?


Are you REALLY that f*cking stupid?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80459 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:49 am to
And a special prosecutor would be the one to decide whether to bring charges.

Again, I'm not understanding the breakdown here.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
80163 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

How did that work out for Ted Kennedy?


Not nearly as badly as it should have.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17069 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

So it's not about the actual leaks right?


What have the leaks said? Absolutely fricking nothing. Show me proof that Trump or ANY of his people ever conspired with Russia to "hack the election."

One shred of proof.

And, no, intelligence "reports" written by Obama operatives in the CIA (without any sources revealed) is not "proof."
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5068 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

the difference being the HRC leaks were from private entities, the Clinton Foundation, Pedesta's email, and the DNC.
These leaks are from government data by government employees loyal to the previous president. It is a classic coup.



You need to write a little slower so they can understand.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Ted Kennedy back in 1984 tried to get the damned KGB to help derail Ronald Reagan's reelection campaign. THE FREAKING KAYYY GEEE BEE for God's sake!



That's nothing- Nixon sabotaged the Paris Peace Talks in 1968 and got tens of thousands of Americans killed because he was worried that peace in Vietnam would cost him the election.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 4:40 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram