Started By
Message
locked post

I agree that a Special Prosecutor SHOULD be appointed..TODAY.

Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:29 am
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:29 am
But not for the reasons the Democrats want. There have been leaks coming from the intelligence community and from the government that are illegal. There is obviously an organized and SEDITIOUS campaign and conspiracy to bring down the duly elected Trump Administration.

These leaks are a direct threat to national security, and the campaign is a conspiracy to overthrow the government.

You want to send a cold chill up the spines of the leakers, the Democrats and the media? Not to mention the Left period? Trump should address the nation and announce the appointment of a Special Prosecutor, someone like a Trey Gowdy or a Ted Cruz, and empower them to go after these people. All hell would break loose, but it is time to fight fire with thermonuclear war. If you don't, the attacks will eventually bring this government down.
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
12936 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:31 am to
These leaks all lead to one place - a house where Obama and Jarrett are organizing treason.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
15843 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:33 am to
Melt bitch.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:33 am to
My point exactly and if they are not stopped sooner or later they might be successful. The campaign even now is getting worse and worse.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:33 am to
Really? We will see who melts boy. It is time to go to war, because the other side is waging one.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:36 am
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80290 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:35 am to
But what if the information leaked also turns out to be true. And what if the transcripts of those calls are worse than we know.

You sure this is a Pandora's box you want to open?
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11230 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:35 am to
So when it was Hillary on the line it was about the actual leaks themselves not the leakers.

But now it's not about the actual leaks...
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80290 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:35 am to
principled conservatives
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
4477 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Melt bitch.


Snowflakes, cuck and melt must really be getting to you dems.. Wear your badge with pride..
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:38 am to
Boosie, there is an investigation ongoing on that subject and the facts, hopefully, are going to come out anyway.

Yeah open it. The leaks are illegal and no government is going to be able to survive in this manner. The campaign against this government is real too and likely much of it is illegal.

You can't stand there and let this go on if you are Trump.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:38 am to
It was NOT the US Government nor Trump that leaked on Hillary.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11230 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:40 am to
quote:

It was NOT the US Government nor Trump that leaked on Hillary.

So it's not about the actual leaks right?

Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80290 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:41 am to
And if the investigation shows someone in the Trump campaign knew it was the Russians leaking the emails or even worse, coordinated to a certain degree, then what?
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:42 am
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:42 am to
You are talking IF..I am talking known facts. There ARE leakers inside the givernment and the leaks by and large ARE illegal.

There IS a campaign ongoing to being down Trump and much of it is illegal too.

Time to go to war.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:44 am to
You don't appoint a Special Prosecutor until it is proven that there is a crime committed.
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17319 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:44 am to
Hell no. The DOJ wouldn't allow once for the Benghazi case so this is certainly not justified.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:45 am to
The aim of the prosecutor would be to find and prosecute the leakers and conspirators. Not to investigate any Russian connections. The FBI is investigating that and so far we have ZERO evidence.

WE KNOW there are leaks that are illegal. WE KNOW there is a campaign and conspiracy to bring down the government.

WE DO NOT KNOW of any evidence of collusion between Trump and any Russians, because there wasn't any. There has to be a crime for there to be a prosecution.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:47 am
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8080 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

You sure this is a Pandora's box you want to open?

Yes, absolutely.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23742 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:46 am to
Investigate Wikileaks all you want.
Posted by UHTiger
Member since Jan 2007
5231 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:47 am to
Keep melting

The truth will come out and the traitor will be impeached
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram