- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hunter is simply a struggling addict. Piling on for political reasons is cruel
Posted on 7/7/23 at 11:37 am to MrPink67
Posted on 7/7/23 at 11:37 am to MrPink67
quote:
Well his dad being a child molester you can understand why the entire family is the way they are
My first thought was the coke was for Joe. They have to be propping his arse up with something JFK style.
0
Posted on 7/7/23 at 11:39 am to AggieHank86
Hank its already known who the coke belongs to. If you believe cameras are not everywhere and cannot be reviewed when needed I don't know what to say.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 11:43 am to AggieHank86
Hank, you have no shame. None. Zero.
Only you hold the balls lovingly of groomers, pedophiles and the president's son as you gently caress their sacks.
Only you hold the balls lovingly of groomers, pedophiles and the president's son as you gently caress their sacks.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 11:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
What I find "normal" is the near-instantaneous certainty in right-wing circles that Hunter Biden was responsible for something that (logistically) it is nearly-impossible for him to have done.
It's almost "impossible" that the FBI or SS couldn't raise a print or DNA off of the "baggie". I mean I guess whomever placed it where it was just happened to be wearing rubber gloves at the time. That would seem to clear up a lot for us conspiracy types.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 11:52 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I suspect it was a staffer, but for you to totally dismiss Hunter..
Hunter (or some other family member) makes more logical sense than a "staffer," though.
I'm not doubting there are staffers doing blow, but how many are toting it to work and are going to toss it out during working hours and leave it around the white house (in "dime bags" or otherwise) with all of the potential risks that entails? Normal professional working people who do such things (especially those who get to that sort of level), in the vast majority of cases, understand a thing or two about discretion.
Whereas Hunter is all but PROVEN not to give one single shite about such things.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:19 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The Bush girls were big time party types...some of it here in GS/OB...
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Has anyone denied it? What an odd comment.
If only there were a way to find out if Hunter might be a user of this drug...
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:32 pm to goatmilker
quote:They have almost certainly created a "short list" of people who put their phones in that cubby during the 48-72 hours before the dime bag was found, yes.
Hank its already known who the coke belongs to. If you believe cameras are not everywhere and cannot be reviewed when needed I don't know what to say.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:34 pm to Houag80
quote:Your focus upon homoerotic imagery with such detail and frequency is indicative of personal knowledge and experience, amigo. Just how many testicles HAVE you fondled?
Houag80
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:35 pm to Lg
quote:Take a TV break. You watch too much CSI.
It's almost "impossible" that the FBI or SS couldn't raise a print or DNA off of the "baggie". I mean I guess whomever placed it where it was just happened to be wearing rubber gloves at the time. That would seem to clear up a lot for us conspiracy types.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:38 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Hunter (or some other family member) makes more logical sense than a "staffer," though.
Maybe, I'm not saying its not Hunter, just that I imagine drug use in the WH is pretty high across the board.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Take a TV break. You watch too much CSI.
Excuse me? My business got broken into and they pulled a print off of a padlock that was busted off a cage that we kept tools in. Are you saying that it can't be done? If it had been "anthrax" do you think they would have been a little more diligent in the investigation? Fentanyl?
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:47 pm to AggieHank86
Odd comment?
You cant even keep your own shitty ideas straight. No wonder you borrow ideas from others.
quote:
that Hunter Biden was responsible for something that (logistically) it is nearly-impossible for him to have done.
You cant even keep your own shitty ideas straight. No wonder you borrow ideas from others.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:53 pm to Lou Pai
It becomes a story when the drug addict is taking bribes from foreign countries and passing some of the money to his father, the president.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 12:56 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Does anyone realize the level of illegal drug use throughout DC? It is large and widespread especially amongst political staffers in Congress and Executive Branch.
Wouldn't surprise me that it is a 30 year old staffer.
Are you saying that there is either executive staff or White House staff that isn’t drug tested regularly?
Posted on 7/7/23 at 2:18 pm to Lou Pai
This has already been the angle the MSM is taking, and even the “moderator” in the RFK Jr. Town hall forum the other night came at him, asking if he would denounce the criticism of Hunter Biden’s sad addiction issues… implying it was unethical and crossed some line as victim shaming. frick these gaslighting POS MFers.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 2:53 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Why do people think it belongs to Hunter?
1. Hunter is an addict.
2. Hunter visited shortly before the cocaine was found.
3. Ever since January 6th, there has been increased security which includes searching everyone except members of the family.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 2:57 pm to moneyg
quote:
Are you saying that there is either executive staff or White House staff that isn’t drug tested regularly?
I don't think they are generally.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 3:32 pm to Lg
Zactly. And we’re not talking about your business… we’re talking about the fricking White House here. They 100% know who it was.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 3:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Roger, I "borrow" from on one.
You cant even keep your own shitty ideas straight. No wonder you borrow ideas from others.
The simple fact is that I find you to be too fricking stupid to take seriously. If your IQ ever managed to claw its way above 100, it would die from lack of oxygen. You IQ is AT LEAST 30 points too low to form thoughts that I am likely to even find marginally interesting.
But I don't feel the need to tell you in EVERY DAMNED POST how fricking stupid you are. For the most part, I simply ignore your stupidity, because you seldom voice a position with enough thought behind it to be worthy of a response.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something I say, reach deep and try to find the words to counter my position. After all, this IS a "discussion forum." Barring some well-reasoned substantive disagreement, however, what say you do me the courtesy of leaving-off with the endless stream of childish insults, OK?
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 4:02 pm
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News