- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: how many schools would need to get shot up before you would consider a gun ban?
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:39 pm to MastrShake
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:39 pm to MastrShake
quote:
oh and is there some reason we shouldnt ban extended mags, as well?
What is your limit? Where do you stop?
What if he walked in with a revolver and killed 6 people? Should we ban revolvers?
What if he killed those people with a box cutter? Should we ban those?
This post was edited on 2/18/18 at 2:40 pm
0
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:39 pm to MastrShake
quote:
Can you guarantee that all gun deaths will end if you ban scary weapons?
quote:
i can guarantee there will be far less, yes.
No you can’t.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:40 pm to MastrShake
Do you feel comfortable with only the police and military having guns?
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:40 pm to Centinel
quote:
never consider a gun ban. For any reason.
I prefer to address the problem, not the tool. You just prefer an emotional kneejerk reaction that will solve nothing.
A gun ban will never be the answer. Killers will find a way to kill. Their methods will change. But outlawing guns will never stop the killing.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to MastrShake
quote:
i bet there are 7 families who wish he only had a pistol.
How many families wish the teachers would have been armed
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to MastrShake
quote:
MastrShake
It is not the guns. We as a society need to seek out the real question to why and I would bet my life guns would not be part of it.
The sad thing is we would rather have our agendas, than preventing more kids being killed.
We let him get to this point, the tool he used is irrelevant at this time.
Would we pat ourselves on the back if he only killed 2 people with a knife, since guns were banned.
Does not matter how many died, it matters that someone died and that should of never happened.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to NIH
Mastrshake told another poster who’s a teacher that he hopes there would be a shooting at his school because the teacher did not agree with gun confiscation.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to MastrShake
quote:
but he didn't. he walked in there with an AR15 and killed 17.
i bet there are 7 families who wish he only had a pistol.
An AR-15 can only shoot one bullet at a time even when you hold down the trigger just like a pistol can only shoot one bullet at a time even when you hold down the trigger.
quote:
oh and is there some reason we shouldnt ban extended mags, as well?
Even if we ban extended mags, unless we build a physical wall on our southern border, illegal extended mag traffickers from Mexico will still cross the border and bring illegal extended mags into the USA.
This post was edited on 2/18/18 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to MastrShake
OH the irony of the mentally ill preaching to everyone about this subject
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to MastrShake
Alright libtard time for a lesson. The AR15 has been around since 1964. Once Colts patents expired in 1977 other manufacturers jumped on board. So given that these guns have been commercially available since 1964, why is it that mass shootings have only been a problem these last 15-20years?
Maybe it has more to do with the people/society/culture. Ask yourself culturally what is the biggest difference between our culture in 1964 and our culture today. Surely the answer is obvious, it’s the erosion of the nuclear family and traditional family values. And who is responsible for this erosion? The Democratic Party and their socialist agendas. So if u want less mass shootings, maybe u should vote R next election cycle to help bring back those traditional family values.
Maybe it has more to do with the people/society/culture. Ask yourself culturally what is the biggest difference between our culture in 1964 and our culture today. Surely the answer is obvious, it’s the erosion of the nuclear family and traditional family values. And who is responsible for this erosion? The Democratic Party and their socialist agendas. So if u want less mass shootings, maybe u should vote R next election cycle to help bring back those traditional family values.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:41 pm to MastrShake
A few things...
1. A gun ban will not make bad people turn in the guns that they already have. If they followed laws, they wouldn't be bad people.
2. A gun ban would result in more violence and division in this country, because for many people a gun ban would be where they draw the line when it comes to the government.
3. A gun ban is unconstitutional.
4. History has shown that rash, emotionally made decisions usually do not result in a good outcome.
1. A gun ban will not make bad people turn in the guns that they already have. If they followed laws, they wouldn't be bad people.
2. A gun ban would result in more violence and division in this country, because for many people a gun ban would be where they draw the line when it comes to the government.
3. A gun ban is unconstitutional.
4. History has shown that rash, emotionally made decisions usually do not result in a good outcome.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:42 pm to MastrShake
quote:
oh and is there some reason we shouldnt ban extended mags, as well?
Because I can make a frickig extended mag in my shop.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:42 pm to BeeFense5
quote:was it a political point going through the head of that child, or a bullet?
This isn’t about guns, it’s about political points
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:42 pm to Toddy
quote:
The gun nuts dont care if 1,000 kids a day get butchered
As if you care about kids, Toddy.
Give me a break. Children are mere props to the likes of you.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:43 pm to MastrShake
quote:
was it a political point going through the head of that child, or a bullet?
Not enough virtue signaling in that post. Try again.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:43 pm to V2_Jigsaw
quote:
Alright libtard time for a lesson. The AR15 has been around since 1964. Once Colts patents expired in 1977 other manufacturers jumped on board. So given that these guns have been commercially available since 1964, why is it that mass shootings have only been a problem these last 15-20years?
Maybe it has more to do with the people/society/culture. Ask yourself culturally what is the biggest difference between our culture in 1964 and our culture today. Surely the answer is obvious, it’s the erosion of the nuclear family and traditional family values. And who is responsible for this erosion? The Democratic Party and their socialist agendas. So if u want less mass shootings, maybe u should vote R next election cycle to help bring back those traditional family values.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:44 pm to MastrShake
quote:I love douchebag hyperbole the best.
was it a political point going through the head of that child, or a bullet?
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:44 pm to MastrShake
quote:
can guarantee there will be far less
How can you guarantee this? You do know the gun doesn’t decide to kill, it’s the human behind it. So what makes you 100% sure that gun violence will end?
And what about all of the black kids that are killed by hand guns every year that far exceed the kids killed in school shootings?
Posted on 2/18/18 at 2:44 pm to Plx1776
quote:
Why are you so opposed to fortifying and protecting our schools?
Here's a good question. After 911 we went all out with airport security. Nobody talked about banning airplanes. Nobody blamed airplanes. Lets get serious about school security.
Page 3 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News