re: How many conspiracy theories are true? Which conspiracies do you think are happening?

quote:

---

It seems like a simple and logical concept, yet for 14 years on this board I have caught nothing but shite from the vast majority for believing it.

---

Yeah, but think of all the enjoyment you’ve gotten out of playing the martyr in that time frame. Not to mention the sense of superiority you’ve gotten from convincing yourself that you’re the only one who gets it.

"I love a good conspiracy theory. Like JFK and Bermuda Triangle type stuff...but I don’t really believe in any of them."

Billy Shears says hello, hello!

quote:

---

Why would a society that advanced want to visit this comparatively primitive shithole?

---

same reason we striving to reach another planet (Mars), which by our standards is a “comparatively primitive shithole”

I used to wonder if there were people who pulled the strings and just gave us the illusion of power but Trump’s election wouldn’t have happened if we didn’t control our own fate. The previous president and intelligence community tried their damndest to put a stop to it but they were ultimately unsuccessful. If a regular ‘uninitiated’ man can become the most powerful person in the world then it would be hard to argue that there is a group of people that control the entire world.

quote:

---

I used to wonder if there were people who pulled the strings and just gave us the illusion of power but Trump’s election wouldn’t have happened if we didn’t control our own fate. The previous president and intelligence community tried their damndest to put a stop to it but they were ultimately unsuccessful. If a regular ‘uninitiated’ man can become the most powerful person in the world then it would be hard to argue that there is a group of people that control the entire world.

---

Honestly, Trump is a blip, and even a drastic change in American politics, it just doesn't effect those overall large goals very much.

And I'm talking big macro-humanity effecting goals, not just the US.

quote:

---

Nutriaitch

---

Just found this

For a brief while, it looked like an air-tight alibi for Oswald.
Just a few seconds after the first shot at President Kennedy was fired, James Altgens of the Associated Press snapped a photograph of the President on Elm Street with the Texas School Book Depository in the background. The photo shows a man who looks uncannily similar to Oswald standing in the doorway. The New York Herald Tribune on May 24, 1964, publicized the claim of researcher Jones Harris that the man indeed was Oswald.

The Herald Tribune was not some supermarket tabloid, but rather a widely respected newspaper. Further, the "Oswald figure" had been noticed and investigated even before the article appeared, so the Commission devoted considerable attention to the claim. They quickly identified Billy Nolan Lovelady as the man in the doorway, and questioned several people about the whereabouts of themselves and Lovelady as the motorcade passed. William Shelley (6H328, CE 1381 pp. 84), Sarah Stanton (CE 1381 pp. 89), Wesley Frazier (2H233-4, 22H 647), Billy Lovelady (6H338-9, CE 1381 pp. 62), and Danny Arce (6H365, 367) all testified and/or signed an affidavit stating Lovelady was standing outside the Depository doors as the motorcade passed (1). Harold Norman (3H189) and James Jarman, Jr. (3H202) testified they saw Lovelady in the doorway minutes before the motorcade passed and they left to watch from the fifth floor of the Depository. Frazier (2H242), Arce (3H367), and Mrs. Donald Baker (7H515) all identified Lovelady as the "Oswald" look-alike in the photograph. Lovelady, of course, identified himself (6H339, Commission Document 457 pp. 2, 4-5). Frazier states that he does not see himself in the photo because he was farther back than Lovelady and thus in the black area of the photograph (2H242). The other people with whom Lovelady was standing, Shelley and Stanton, were also farther back than him and so are also not shown in the picture. This is why Lovelady appears to be standing alone.

On the basis of all this evidence, the Commission concluded that the man was Lovelady, not Oswald (WCR, pp. 147-149). This should have settled the issue forever, but alas in this case issues are rarely ever "settled." The issue was revived, not due to some research done by conspiracists, but rather because of an FBI mistake.



Tl:Dr. Oswald wasn't guy in doorway according to multiple witnesses. Including actual guy in doorway.