- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do we change the culture of bad decision-making?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
The Ubi would get rid of welfare..SS. Medicaid.. Medicare..Food stamps.. Housing subsidies.. Single women welfare...As well as agriculture subsidies, etc
A Ubi of say $10k each would save us billions
A Ubi of say $10k each would save us billions
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:But it should be more efficient (less bureaucracy; less fraud, etc.), and I think from an incentives standpoint, it diminishes the reinforcement of poor decision-making and a lack of self-improvement. The entitlement system incentivizes people to stay in need.
but UBI is going to cost a LOT more than what we spend on welfare
UBI is one thing that I'm hypocritically open to. Listening to the Freakonomics podcast regarding it, and seeing the support from people like Friedman and Hayek, really changed my perspective a bit.
Doing some more research, I found Hayek's moral arguments, regarding government control and coercion in an entitlement system pretty compelling.
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 11:48 am
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:45 am to rocket31
quote:
There is plenty of money to support both health care and a UBI
LOL
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:48 am to buckeye_vol
UBI will eventually happen
until then, this is an impossible question to solve
until then, this is an impossible question to solve
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:49 am to rocket31
quote:
The Ubi would get rid of welfare..SS. Medicaid.. Medicare..Food stamps.. Housing subsidies.. Single women welfare...As well as agriculture subsidies, etc
A Ubi of say $10k each would save us billions
for 300M people that would be $3T, right?
how much do you think we spend on all of those programs/year?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:49 am to Salmon
quote:If the government could think scientifically, we could reseach how it works on a small scale and go from there.
UBI will eventually happen
until then, this is an impossible question to solve
I guess a venture capitalist firm is planning to do a large study on UBI; I really hope they do since they'll study it scientifically, and it's a private venture.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:50 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
UBI is one thing that I'm hypocritically open to. Listening to the Freakonomics podcast regarding it, and seeing the support from people like Friedman and Hayek, really changed my perspective a bit.
oh i'm open to discussion about the UBI, but it would have to be so low that it would not be acceptable for people to support
at some point it may no be possible to organize a society without one (when the robots take over)
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
at some point it may no be possible to organize a society without one (when the robots take over)
this is what I mean in that it will eventually happen
hopefully I'm dead by then
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:51 am to Salmon
i just can't wait to learn kung fu
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:52 am to CoachChappy
quote:This won't change people's reproductive habits, and you're naive if you think that it will.
ETA example: If you have 1 baby, we (the government/American people) will help you out. When you have your 2nd-10th, you are on your own.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:53 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
But the problem is that it's probably a combination of pooe decision-making with poor circumstances outside their control
Of course there could be many factors at play when you consider each case, but the decisions each individual or their parents make have, by far, the greatest implications on affecting their financial status.
And therefore finding a solution to rectify those bad decisions need to be where you start in order to find a solution to combating poverty.
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 11:54 am
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:54 am to ballscaster
quote:
This won't change people's reproductive habits, and you're naive if you think that it will.
how could welfare benefits ever change reproductive habits of a society? i wish there was data on this...
quote:
The percentage of children born outside of marriage has skyrocketed, with a six-fold increase since 1960. Currently, the figure is highest among blacks, but the rate of increase is highest among whites and Hispanics.
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 11:57 am
Posted on 2/13/17 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
That graph is sort of incomplete.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:00 pm to rocket31
quote:
Everyone gets the same amount. Everyone
So I'll have to pay $12k in taxes to get $10k back in UBI. No thanks.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
There ought to be a massive effort aimed at instilling the "cheat codes" of life into every young child at all levels of public school.
1) Graduate from high school,
2) Don't have children until you are married,
3) Don't get addicted to drugs or alcohol,
4) Don't commit crime.
If you do those four things, your chances of remaining in poverty for the rest of your life are extremely low. If you get married and provide a two parent household to your children and pass these rules down, the odds of your child living in poverty are even more drastically reduced.
We basically need to give up on the idea that we can save people over the age of 12 who are already in the bad decision/poverty cycle. We also need to get over the idea that you cannot patronize them; you can and it is right. If you really love your kid, then you don't want them to make the same mistakes you did. They need to be told that their parent screwed up and that there is a better, easier way.
I envision something along the lines of the anti-smoking campaign. By the time they are teenagers, it is already too late. You have to impress these ideas onto them before age 11.
I think the biggest obstacle to something like this is obviously the garbage PC culture we have. You have to be able to say that being a single mom or having a criminal record is bad instead of blaming everything on "the system" or "the patriarchy" or "the school-to-prison pipeline." You also have to be able to say that we have "given up" on those who are too old to really absorb the idea in any meaningful way.
Behaviorally speaking, you need to identify and use an effective motivator. The two very best motivators are social stigma and actual extreme hardship. People who make bad decisions that lead to poverty just don't experience the kind of actual extreme hardship that would force change. No one is starving to death. This is a good thing. For that reason, we need to get reacquainted with social stigma as a tool. You would think liberals would be all for this since it is a "for the greater good" collectivist-type of thought.
1) Graduate from high school,
2) Don't have children until you are married,
3) Don't get addicted to drugs or alcohol,
4) Don't commit crime.
If you do those four things, your chances of remaining in poverty for the rest of your life are extremely low. If you get married and provide a two parent household to your children and pass these rules down, the odds of your child living in poverty are even more drastically reduced.
We basically need to give up on the idea that we can save people over the age of 12 who are already in the bad decision/poverty cycle. We also need to get over the idea that you cannot patronize them; you can and it is right. If you really love your kid, then you don't want them to make the same mistakes you did. They need to be told that their parent screwed up and that there is a better, easier way.
I envision something along the lines of the anti-smoking campaign. By the time they are teenagers, it is already too late. You have to impress these ideas onto them before age 11.
I think the biggest obstacle to something like this is obviously the garbage PC culture we have. You have to be able to say that being a single mom or having a criminal record is bad instead of blaming everything on "the system" or "the patriarchy" or "the school-to-prison pipeline." You also have to be able to say that we have "given up" on those who are too old to really absorb the idea in any meaningful way.
Behaviorally speaking, you need to identify and use an effective motivator. The two very best motivators are social stigma and actual extreme hardship. People who make bad decisions that lead to poverty just don't experience the kind of actual extreme hardship that would force change. No one is starving to death. This is a good thing. For that reason, we need to get reacquainted with social stigma as a tool. You would think liberals would be all for this since it is a "for the greater good" collectivist-type of thought.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
At some point?
Hell it's already happening
Our entire economic model is backwards.
We should be trying to eliminate jobs and increase production effeciency through technology and automation. That should be the goal, it's the eventual outcome anyways
Hell it's already happening
Our entire economic model is backwards.
We should be trying to eliminate jobs and increase production effeciency through technology and automation. That should be the goal, it's the eventual outcome anyways
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:04 pm to ballscaster
quote:
ETA example: If you have 1 baby, we (the government/American people) will help you out. When you have your 2nd-10th, you are on your own.
This won't change people's reproductive habits, and you're naive if you think that it will.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:05 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
Well actually teaching basic financial competence in middle school/early high school would help.
CT, if I could up vote this 100 times, I would.
This is a major problem, and it's been a problem for a long time. No one wants to educate each other about how to make sound financial decisions and run a household the right way.
And do you want to know why? Because too many times the people who have those skills enjoy keeping their advantage over those who don't. A lot of people benefit from keeping people stupid about money.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:08 pm to Tigerlaff
quote:
I think the biggest obstacle to something like this is obviously the garbage PC culture we have. You have to be able to say that being a single mom or having a criminal record is bad instead of blaming everything on "the system" or "the patriarchy" or "the school-to-prison pipeline." You also have to be able to say that we have "given up" on those who are too old to really absorb the idea in any meaningful way.
i won't even call it PC culture
it's guilt culture. people just feel guilty at their success for some reason
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:09 pm to CoachChappy
Well maybe I'm wrong then.
Popular
Back to top


3





