re: How do Sandy Hook deniers feel about Jones saying it's real?

quote:

---

I can't say whether or not children died, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that something wasn't right.

---

So what is the something that wasn’t right?

quote:

---

There's lots of eyebrow-raising info surrounding the shooting, not the least of which being that Newton is/was supposedly a community of federal government workers.

---

AND...(this may be a yuge trigger)...the community was reportedly said to be comprised of an unusual number of Occultists / Satanists as well.

Coincidentally.

All of which may well be scrubbed as are many other reports from that time.

quote:

---

I realize that Jones is being attacked so they can silence him...

---

quote:

---

Do any of you do this with all of the legacy media outlets who are wrong more often and have done much more harm?

Oh that’s right, you were only told to care about what Alex Jones did, so you’re just being obedient.

---

OUCH.

That's gonna leave a mark on the Gatekeepers.

quote:

---

he parents were fake actors.

---

Some were and I don't think this has every been disputed.

quote:

---

So from the same folks who set the official narrative we are to believe the following occurrences we are we were told they were...

Covid
Covid Vaccines
Russian Collusion
2020 Election
January 6th protest
Ukraine Impeachment
Trayvon Martin
Mike Brown
9-11
Hunter Biden laptop
Benghazi
Afghanistan
Iraq
TWA 800
Las Vegas shooting
Boston Marathon bombing
BLM
Clinton Foundation/Hillary corruption
Uvalde

Those are just a few I can rattle off the top of my head, but suddenly, voila, we have a breakthrough where the government and the media just decide to be honest about a big event with no motivation to lie about anything like , cough cough, gun control laws?

---

quote:

---

So what is the something that wasn’t right?

---

Since you asked...this is a good breakdown I located that goes to factual oddities and curiosities of the incident. Many as it happened in real time which caught my eye right off.

From the article...

Media
The way the media fumbled their stories and mismanaged their news delivery also must be taken to task, and questioned.

Why did CNN use a clip of a SWAT team drill, shot at St. Rose of Lima Elementary School from months before, and present it as footage of a real-life law enforcement response at Sandy Hook?

Why was Adam's mother repeatedly said to have worked at the school, and what were the motives of those who gave these glowing testimonials of her exemplary character and bubbly personality?

At 11:02 a.m., the media reported that police had raided a suspect's residence. The Lanza house wasn't allegedly entered until after 2 p.m. Who's house was entered, and on what grounds? What was found?

Where, amongst the copious raw helicopter footage, are the images of this huge evacuation? Shouldn't the news media have been inundated with the video and images of 600+ kids and staff, at least as many parents/family members, in addition to police, fire and medical personnel at the fire depot and school grounds?

We have but one single photo of about a dozen kids to make a case for said "evacuation".

Most schools have a handful of school buses on the grounds, at the beginning and end of every school day. Where were the buses?

Why would any scenes within this mass evacuation be ignored? Wouldn't the news media want any of that footage, instead of the bizarre interviews and shots of anonymous, wandering people?

One relatively strange media moment, is when Robbie Parker, father of Emilie Parker, enters a press conference, oddly laughing and smiling and asks "just read the card?" , before hyperventilating and switching into grief mode.

Robbie's statement was that of a distressed parent; why would anything a grieving parent wanted to say be written on a card?

The whole article doesn't speculate on the overall veracity of Sandy Hook, but there are a metric shite-ton of odd things that happened and seem way off. I would suggest just looking at this list of curiosities about it.

LINK

quote:

---

WIDELY reported at the time.

---

By who?

quote:

---

he big takeaway is the problem with, instead of a frank discussion of things, folks who don't go along with the official narrative are castigated. This is NOT healthy.

---

Nor is it American.

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist. I do keep an open mind though that things aren't as they seem, and so if it comes out I'm not surprised, as anything is possible I guess. Especially since we are seeing things created in books and movies half a century ago are popping up now in true life, as if they were gameplans not just fantasy/warnings.

More like the "I can see that, but not going to stress out on it as its not like I'm ever going to be in the position to really know or do anything about it" approach.

I'm a believer of many DATA Privacy/Usage concern issues, since we are seeing what is being done IRL, and not hard to see.

Aliens is the one of thing I will not entertain though. A legit Alien will need to walk up to me ET stylz for me to say..."ok I seent it now"

quote:

---

WIDELY reported at the time. NOW? Revisionist "history" sez: "Just another CT!"

---

It's quite nifty how you insulate yourself from ever having to substantiate your claims in this way.

"It was all scrubbed but it was definitely widely reported at the time."

But you understand there is a difference between a “open discussion” and openly lying about someone?

quote:

---

Especially since we are seeing things created in books and movies half a century ago are popping up now in true life, as if they were gameplans not just fantasy/warnings.

---

This is interesting. Like what?