- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do Sandy Hook deniers feel about Jones saying it's real?
Posted on 8/4/22 at 12:51 pm to ghost2most
Posted on 8/4/22 at 12:51 pm to ghost2most
Does it matter at this point? Do all the questions about Obama matter at this point. The harm was done so why go back to it? For all intents and purposes it happened exactly as it was reported. Nothing would change that.
0
Posted on 8/4/22 at 12:52 pm to Crimson1st
On one hand, I miss the days when deniers were stuck rambling to the walls of their sheds. On the other, shite like this is some of the best entertainment available today.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 12:56 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It's quite nifty how you insulate yourself from ever having to substantiate your claims in this way.
And it's quite convenient that you never believe Google, FB, and all the mainstream sources do NOT scrub the internet of article, videos, data, info that incriminate the Liars.
It's ok to have a Gatekeeper gig in defense of the MSM and your Goob overlords
-- but come on -- you can stop pretending you're actually interested in truth. quote:
It was all scrubbed but it was definitely widely reported at the time."
Stop being lazy, put your GTA video game on hold, and conduct your own search.
Turns out there are STILL many links to MANY articles that vouch for Newtown CT as being a Satanic epicenter of sorts. (Do you find this to be un-believable?)
Posted on 8/4/22 at 12:57 pm to ghost2most
The point of this trial isn’t that SH was real or fake.
It’s to essentially codify that the government can do something so heinous that it becomes “immoral” to even suggest they’ve done it, given that the official position is that they haven’t done it.
If the official position becomes that they HAVE done it, it becomes foolish to suggest that shouldn’t have done it.
It’s to essentially codify that the government can do something so heinous that it becomes “immoral” to even suggest they’ve done it, given that the official position is that they haven’t done it.
If the official position becomes that they HAVE done it, it becomes foolish to suggest that shouldn’t have done it.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:01 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
On one hand, I miss the days when deniers were stuck rambling to the walls of their sheds. On the other, shite like this is some of the best entertainment available today.
Entertainment is one thing. Denying a stolen election without "proof" is something very different, as it has completely fricked your way of life.
And, voila, the deniers are born. You can add me to the group. I'll question everything this propagandist media tries to feed me.
It is what it is. Be entertained for all I care. Go get spoon fed bullshite by Cnn, msnbc, fox, etc.
Also, don't forget your booster!
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:05 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
Be entertained for all I care.
Oh, I am.
I don't know if it's the ignorance or the cowardice that provides more of it. Maybe equal parts of both.
quote:
Go get spoon fed bullshite by Cnn, msnbc, fox, etc.
I don't remember the last time I "watched the news." It's an absolute certainty that you spend more time looking at those...sources...trying to find something to get outraged about.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:05 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
On one hand, I miss the days when deniers were stuck rambling to the walls of their sheds. On the other, shite like this is some of the best entertainment available today.
Here's your problem...you are an expert at being disingenuous and full of shite...but before I get into that, you should really not sully Clarence Thomas by having him as your avatar. But anyway, in no way did I come out and say Sandy Hook did not happen. My beef is with those, such as yourself, who want to marginalize those who have questions as to the official narrative when it is painfully obvious there was a lot of things that don't add up about the story and the official narrative.
You can be oblivious if you want but in court, if I were an attorney, I would have an cake walk of a time impeaching ANY testimony coming from the media and government based of the Trump era alone. Their political agenda is beyond dispute and thus they have ruined their credibility beyond repair at this point. But as I said, you go on and be the good little sheep if you want.
As a service to you as well, I'll remind you to check your schedule as I'm sure you are coming up on your 5th Covid booster by now...tool!
This post was edited on 8/4/22 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:09 pm to Liberator
quote:
Stop being lazy, put your GTA video game on hold, and conduct your own search.
Now that's asking a lot...it's probably the only way he can get some chick action!
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:09 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
shite...but before I get into that, you should really not sully Clarence Thomas by having him as your avatar
You should be embarrassed.
quote:
those who have questions as to the official narrative
Don't soften it up now, pureblood.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:14 pm to ghost2most
Not going to touch Sandy Hook as it is a radioactive topic
TL:DR - it is all about CONTROL (TOTAL CONTROL)
In general, there is a lack of discernment between a hoax and a false flag
Hoax: faked, made up events. The events did not take place. Often no-one was harmed (overt slight of hand)
False flag: nudged events. Events did take place. People do get harmed (who have no idea they are in the false flag). Nefarious actors are involved at important nodes of the event to nudge the outcome/interpretation.
Example: 9/11 was not hoaxed. It happened. 9/11 could have been a false flag (mainstream = Saudis, fringe = inside job)
My interpretation is that folks who do not understand these themes label anyone who ponders an event as a potential false flag as a hoaxer (or "denier"). It is more subtle as false flags have indeed occurred in history and documented as such (Gulf of Tonkin = entry into Vietnam. Events happened, but orchestrated by US military)
Regarding school shootings:
Social media is the current MK-ULTRA conditioner for the masses (filter bubbles included). A "crazy" society is by design...
Regarding the poster who commented on "aliens", check out this mainstream dialogue a few day ago and report back (about "reality")
Dr Nolan (Stanford) goes deep into many topics:
presence of others on Earth and in the ocean
ability to manipulate conciousness
biological avatars
The topic trancends politics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7cKhIJnTpo
Ponder the point in the conversation when they stop and ask, "What else in your life have you had to reconsider"
TL:DR - it is all about CONTROL (TOTAL CONTROL)
In general, there is a lack of discernment between a hoax and a false flag
Hoax: faked, made up events. The events did not take place. Often no-one was harmed (overt slight of hand)
False flag: nudged events. Events did take place. People do get harmed (who have no idea they are in the false flag). Nefarious actors are involved at important nodes of the event to nudge the outcome/interpretation.
Example: 9/11 was not hoaxed. It happened. 9/11 could have been a false flag (mainstream = Saudis, fringe = inside job)
My interpretation is that folks who do not understand these themes label anyone who ponders an event as a potential false flag as a hoaxer (or "denier"). It is more subtle as false flags have indeed occurred in history and documented as such (Gulf of Tonkin = entry into Vietnam. Events happened, but orchestrated by US military)
Regarding school shootings:
Social media is the current MK-ULTRA conditioner for the masses (filter bubbles included). A "crazy" society is by design...
Regarding the poster who commented on "aliens", check out this mainstream dialogue a few day ago and report back (about "reality")
Dr Nolan (Stanford) goes deep into many topics:
presence of others on Earth and in the ocean
ability to manipulate conciousness
biological avatars
The topic trancends politics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7cKhIJnTpo
quote:
Dr. Garry Nolan on Tucker Carlson (FULL INTERVIEW)
17,067 views Premiered 21 hours ago The full interview of Dr. Garry Nolan discussing UFOs with Tucker Carlson.
Ponder the point in the conversation when they stop and ask, "What else in your life have you had to reconsider"
This post was edited on 8/4/22 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:16 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You should be embarrassed.
Coming from you, I appreciate the compliment!
quote:
Don't soften it up now, pureblood.
I didn't...I am not convinced either way and will do my research over time as I see fit. But I am also not naive enough to just buy inot what the MSM and government tells me these days without looking into the things that matter to me further. I'm not just taking their "word" for it. Their word is worthless to me these days...so yep, nothing soft here from this pureblood!
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:18 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
Since you asked...this is a good breakdown I located that goes to factual oddities and curiosities of the incident. Many as it happened in real time which caught my eye right off.
From the article...
Media
The way the media fumbled their stories and mismanaged their news delivery also must be taken to task, and questioned.
Why did CNN use a clip of a SWAT team drill, shot at St. Rose of Lima Elementary School from months before, and present it as footage of a real-life law enforcement response at Sandy Hook?
At 11:02 a.m., the media reported that police had raided a suspect's residence. The Lanza house wasn't allegedly entered until after 2 p.m. Who's house was entered, and on what grounds? What was found?
Where, amongst the copious raw helicopter footage, are the images of this huge evacuation? Shouldn't the news media have been inundated with the video and images of 600+ kids and staff, at least as many parents/family members, in addition to police, fire and medical personnel at the fire depot and school grounds?
We have but one single photo of about a dozen kids to make a case for said "evacuation".
Most schools have a handful of school buses on the grounds, at the beginning and end of every school day. Where were the buses?...
One relatively strange media moment, is when Robbie Parker, father of Emilie Parker, enters a press conference, oddly laughing and smiling and asks "just read the card?" , before hyperventilating and switching into grief mode.
Robbie's statement was that of a distressed parent; why would anything a grieving parent wanted to say be written on a card?
The whole article doesn't speculate on the overall veracity of Sandy Hook, but there are a metric shite-ton of odd things that happened and seem way off. I would suggest just looking at this list of curiosities about it.
Bravo. Thanks for the link as well. The Truth fears no investigation. Lies REQUIRE historical revisionism. And Gaslighting.
What we're currently seeing are the usual bluster and bullsh*t gaslighting by the MSM, Goobermint sources and Gatekeepers who demand frontal lobotomies and erasure / denial of event memories of details, scenes, convos, contradictions and inconsistencies of events at the time. This included ongoing independent investigations / investigators that were being sandbagged and obstructed at the same time.
Also...
Recall the aerial video taken of the emergency personnel at the scene? Remember how the SAME personnel kept on moving through the building in a circle IN thru the Entrance, OUT thru the Exit as if on a loop?
Remember the badly pre-rehearsed "reaction" interviews? One "grieved" father is laughing, then upon receiving his directoral cue begins to tell his sob story?
Shameful. All of it.
Crisis Actors from a company who never hid their "service". Sloppy and not even good theatrics...
NOW...in retrospect, we see how many are being told they actually did NOT see what they saw at the time TODAY. Alex Jones is definitely being scapegoated and made an example for the SH episode AND for his past exposes.
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:20 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
Now that's asking a lot...it's probably the only way he can get some chick action!
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:27 pm to Liberator
quote:
Bravo. Thanks for the link as well. The Truth fears no investigation. Lies REQUIRE historical revisionism. And Gaslighting.
Thanks and yes I totally agree...just common sense if nothing else.
We can look at something like Covid, as a recent parallel. Nobody is denying Covid for example...but when political agendas got mixed in with it, it became a toxic misinformation situation. Here in just two years or so, we see all the false narratives floated out by the media and government gone to seed.
We were told things that were not true and flat out lies based solely on desired political outcomes and Covid was used as the vehicle. So at this point, it is so necessary to question what we are led to believe about Covid, one would be a complete fool to just believe what they are told by the media or the government without looking into the matter further. Unfortunately those people exist however and many times are the same ones who get all sanctimonious towards those of us who think independently just as they do with situations such as questioning the Sandy Hooks of this world.
This post was edited on 8/4/22 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:27 pm to Liberator
quote:
the SAME personnel kept on moving through the building in a circle IN thru the Entrance, OUT thru the Exit as if on a loop?
Yep. It supposedly created the look of chaos.
Did one parent even see their deceased child at any point, ever?
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:30 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
I didn't
Sure you did.
"Here's a bunch of conspiracies."
"Well, no, I'm just asking some questions."
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:45 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I didn't
quote:
Sure you did.
"Here's a bunch of conspiracies."
"Well, no, I'm just asking some questions."
Hmm...not exactly a list of Conspiracies. Many have been unveiled fully already and I told you how I feel about Sandy Hook yet you are choosing to be obtuse as well on that. Anyway, since when has asking questions been the determining factor on where one falls on a given subject?
To answer my question...I guess to someone who believes it's all or nothing, with "all" being to fully believe the government/media's version of the truth, then that means questioning their version is akin to not believing any of it.
This post was edited on 8/4/22 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:46 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
Many
"Some of this stuff is totally true, guys!"
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:51 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
"Some of this stuff is totally true, guys!"
You're even showing that you're full of crap here as you aren't quoting me.
You obviously believe a lot of false stuff...like that Ohio State had a prayer in 2020 before Bama beat that arse!
Posted on 8/4/22 at 1:52 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
you aren't quoting me
You didn't say many? Or I'm the one introducing you to sarcasm.
Either one is funny, so I don't have a preference.
Page 4 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News