- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How big will comey's testimony actually be?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:39 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:39 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
You absolutely are allowed to make shite up on a message board, but you're still just making shite up.
what did I make up. Be specific.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:43 pm to Hawkeye95
Am I really the first?
Yuuuuuuuuuge.
But not really.
Yuuuuuuuuuge.
But not really.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:48 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:He wasn't asked if he ever met with the Russians. He volunteered that false information.
Sessions testified he was asked if he ever met with Russians as a Trump surrogate, he lied because he didn't mention meeting with Russians as a sitting US Senator"
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:49 pm to Hawkeye95
It will be a nothing burger. All has been leaked about Comey and Trump. If Trump goes down so does Obama. As Dershowitz has made clear, Trump did nothing illegal. It is bad politically but it is all already out there... Regarding Obama it is illegal to use the IC to do oppo research but does anybody think he will be held accountable?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:49 pm to StPeteLSU
quote:
It won't matter. There is no way to prove intent to obstruct. Big nothing burger just fun for the media.
He's already said he fired Comey over the Russia investigation in public and that by firing Comey, the pressure was relieved on him with regard to Russia to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador.
If he made those statements suggesting obstruction in such precarious situations, do you think he might not have said such things and worse to his own advisors? Mueller's got subpoena power. He's going to probably find out what Sessions, Bannon, Kushner know. Maybe Pence. Perhaps the President himself.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:52 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
He wasn't asked if he ever met with the Russians. He volunteered that false information.
He doesn't have the out that comey has.
you can watch the exchange yourself
LINK
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:54 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
At the same time, I'm sure he's under tight wraps from Mueller and they don't want to contaminate the most important stuff before it reaches Grand Jury eyeballs.
i think this is the over-riding factor and will make it ultimately quite boring.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:55 pm to TigerDoc
quote:Of all the dumb shite he's done, this might take the cake so far.
He's already said he fired Comey over the Russia investigationin public and that by firing Comey, the pressure was relieved on him with regard to Russia to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:57 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
He wasn't asked if he ever met with the Russians. He volunteered that false information.
Here is a written question submitted to and answered by Sessions in conjunction with his confirmation hearing WHICH frickING COUNTS AS TESTIMONY where he was asked the question and said no.
Leahy: Several of the president-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after Election Day?
Sessions: No.
LINK
Franken's questions pertained to those written answers that Sessions had already provided.
So yes, Sessions DID get asked whether he had met with the Russians about the 2016 election and he answered no, and then of course fools like you try to claim he lied b/c he didn't mention meetings as a US Senator that had nothing to do with the 2016 election.
Any other points you would like to be destroyed on?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:57 pm to StPeteLSU
quote:
It won't matter. There is no way to prove intent to obstruct. Big nothing burger just fun for the media
just a clarification for you, no one has to prove intent in a court of law. It is next to impossible to impossible to prosecute a sitting president. There is no forum to prove intent outside an impeachment trial. I have repeatedly stated that trump is not going to be impeached (based on what I know), so there is no forum.
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:58 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Cool. So his lies are documented on paper, too.
It's also strange that he claims he met with Russians in a capacity of the Armed Services Committee, yet not a single other member of the committee ever met with them.
He's recused himself and is now under investigation by Mueller. So, no, it's nothing like Comey answering the question he was asked.
It's also strange that he claims he met with Russians in a capacity of the Armed Services Committee, yet not a single other member of the committee ever met with them.
He's recused himself and is now under investigation by Mueller. So, no, it's nothing like Comey answering the question he was asked.
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:00 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Cool. So his lies are documented on paper, too.
LOL you prove my point. What a retard you are.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:00 pm to Hawkeye95
Mueller has already put the leash on Comey. You can expect them to talk about meetings we already know about but that's it.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:03 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
The testimony will be mostly yawnsville
I expecting this
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:09 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:It will be a cure for insomnia.....
How big will comey's testimony actually be?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:15 pm to Hawkeye95
Does Comney himself have any skeletons himself over at the FBI?
Does Comney have a axe to grind with Trump?
Does the FBI and the IC really have hard evidence for Admin/Russian collusion?
Will Comney be the tool both Dems and Repubs use to damage Trump and assure a one term outsider POTUS?
So many unknowns and backroom players it will be interesting to see how it all plays out
Does Comney have a axe to grind with Trump?
Does the FBI and the IC really have hard evidence for Admin/Russian collusion?
Will Comney be the tool both Dems and Repubs use to damage Trump and assure a one term outsider POTUS?
So many unknowns and backroom players it will be interesting to see how it all plays out
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:18 pm to Jbird
The kicker is the tape trump made.
Faked?
Non existent??
28 minutes missing?
Faked?
Non existent??
28 minutes missing?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 2:30 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:CNNMSNBCCBSCNBCABCNBCNYTWASHPO say it with be earth shattering.
There is a fair bit of hype about his testimony this week. Not only on CNN, but other news outlets plus it is all over social media.
Do you think it will be impactful?
Expectation is that Comey will say Trump demanded a personal pledge of loyalty, told him to drop the investigation, and obstructed justice. They have gone so far as to discount Comey's previous testimony denying all that by parsing those previous comments as pertinent only to the DOJ.
If Comey does any of that, he will be wholly discredited. But he's asked for public testimony, which intimates revenge of some sort. He has to understand Rosenstein's letter is devastating for him. So I really don't know what to expect.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News