Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

House rejects ban on hand-held phone use in cars

Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:19 pm
Posted by lammo
RIP LAMMO
Member since Aug 2005
9358 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:19 pm
Proof positive that the Legislature doesn't give a shite about lowering car insurance rates by making highways safer.

SB 3818 tort deform is just free money for the insurance companies.

Follow the money from insurance companies to legislators' campaign funds, first laundered through PACs.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80293 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:20 pm to
Not sure the issue here. It's already illegal in certain states.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28420 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:20 pm to
This was obviously going to get killed. Lawmakers arent passing laws that affect themselves
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67994 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:21 pm to
isn't there already a law against distracted driving?


how many fricking laws do we need?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79740 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:21 pm to
If you’re not Bluetoothing by now anyway, you’re in the Stone Age.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164284 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:23 pm to
Good. Using a phone is no different than a hands free speaker system yet one is pushed and the other is criminalized. I drive with one hand anyways.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34127 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Not sure the issue here. It's already illegal in certain states.

If it's law more people will obey the law, and it will rob the Ambulance Chasers an opportunity to sue the shite out of someone for negligence caused by someone on the phone while driving.
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
38923 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

isn't there already a law against distracted driving?


Not everywhere
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
13953 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Proof positive that the Legislature doesn't give a shite about lowering car insurance rates by making highways safer.


Fortunately following the 10th Amendment is more important than lowering car insurance rates. Though, given the Democrat majority in the House and their compulsion to control every aspect of everyone's life I'm surprised this didn't pass.
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10637 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

If you’re not Bluetoothing by now anyway, you’re in the Stone Age.


Not all cars have that capability. You would be banning some people from being able to use a phone in the car.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36096 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

making highways safer

You think this is why this legislation is being introduced? I bet if you look closely, law enforcement is the engine behind this. Just another reason to be able to pull you over and seize your property.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79740 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Not all cars have that capability. You would be banning some people from being able to use a phone in the car.



My car didn’t have the capability.

I had the capability installed. No excuse.

Not commenting either way on the legislation itself. But the Bluetooth technology is relatively inexpensive. And if you’re not using it, you’re backing up.
This post was edited on 5/28/20 at 6:00 pm
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29191 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 6:34 pm to
Congress?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71194 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I drive with one hand anyways.


Wuss.

I steer with my knee.
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5715 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Follow the money from insurance companies to legislators' campaign funds, first laundered through PACs.


As opposed to the funding for the judges? That is a little humorous, all that money for judges and then the judges get cut down from $50k to $5k.

Lammo isn’t a play on your last name, is it?
Posted by lammo
RIP LAMMO
Member since Aug 2005
9358 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 6:49 pm to
Judges get just as much campaign money from insurance companies as they do from plaintiff lawyers.

And no.
Posted by lammo
RIP LAMMO
Member since Aug 2005
9358 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 6:51 pm to
Most cell phones have speaker function.
This post was edited on 5/28/20 at 6:52 pm
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 5/28/20 at 7:11 pm to
Police State....


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram