Started By
Message
locked post

House Democrats unveil environmental justice bill

Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:06 am
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:06 am
Democratic lawmakers on Thursday rolled out an environmental justice bill that aims to address inequities faced by marginalized communities.

“For far too long, communities of color, low-income communities and tribal and indigenous communities have not been a meaningful voice in the decision-making process impacting their well-being. Not with this bill,” said Rep. Donald McEachin (D-Va.) during a press conference.

Advocates have long called for action to tackle unequal effects of environmental issues on these communities. There have been studies, for example, that show that low-income and non-white communities face greater impacts from pollution.

The new bill, slated for introduction Thursday, would require that cumulative impacts be considered in Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act permitting decisions.

Lawmakers were joined on Thursday by environmental justice advocates, who said they played a role in helping to shape the legislation.

“I have to witness the health of my kids declining from the cumulative effects of pollution,” said Kim Gaddy, an environmental justice organizer for Clean Water Action of New Jersey. “We live in communities that are under attack.” LINK
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68212 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:08 am to
quote:

“I have to witness the health of my kids declining from the cumulative effects of pollution,” said Kim Gaddy, an environmental justice organizer for Clean Water Action of New Jersey
Shes full of shite.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:09 am to
Blame whitey!
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67887 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:10 am to



Talk about recycling old narratives.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:10 am to
So, people who buy cheap land right by Exxon in NBR, which is cheap BECAUSE it is by Exxon, will be able to sue Exxon for ecological damage?

Yeah, this will end well.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101390 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

tribal and indigenous communities


What's the difference between a "tribal" and an "indigenous" community?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:13 am to
All indigenous people are tribal. Not all tribes are indigenous.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:14 am to
quote:

It would also use revenue from new fees on fossil fuel industries to support communities as they transition away from greenhouse gas-dependent economies and authorize $75 million to support projects to address environmental and public health issues.


$75 million? That's it?

That would barely cover the cost of the overhead. There would be about 1% of that money that would make it to these "communities"

This post was edited on 2/27/20 at 11:15 am
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:15 am to
The only thing on reservations is tribal shite right?
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6758 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:16 am to
EPA already has an environmental justice group. I don't see why this is needed.

LINK
This post was edited on 2/27/20 at 11:18 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:18 am to
My guess is that group got slapped down for some of its previous practices.

Wasn’t that the section which was fronting money to lawyers to sue the EPA in order to get a consent decree?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:19 am to
quote:

EPA already has an environmental justice group. I don't see why this is needed.


As I pointed out, the price tag of the bill is a dead giveaway. This is nothing more than creating cushy jobs for activists who will have no expectation to produce anything beyond "government certified" propaganda.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:19 am to
Quit voting for dims and you won't have these problems.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12173 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:20 am to
Why don't you use the 75 million to hire inner city people to clean up the inner city.

Thus actually reducing pollution.

Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:21 am to
quote:

We live in communities that are under attack



"Yeah, well they are your sons without dads...they are pissed off, hungry and scared, lacking hope or having a vision of prosperity for themselves.

You built that!!!"
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51586 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:25 am to
quote:

“I have to witness the health of my kids declining from the cumulative effects of pollution,”


Should the fact that she isn't moving from such a horrid environment be grounds for a charge of Child Endangerment?
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:26 am to
quote:

So, people who buy cheap land right by Exxon in NBR, which is cheap BECAUSE it is by Exxon, will be able to sue Exxon for ecological damage?



Well, since LA is now suing ExxonMobil and others, for legally permitted work they did, approved thru the Corp of engineers....yeah, anything in this state that helps lawyers can and will happen.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:28 am to
And people wonder why the GDP growth in the state has flatlined.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:28 am to
quote:

We live in communities that are under attack

This is complete bullshite

These people love to either ignore or just flat out rewrite history. If you look at historically industrial areas, you'll see that people used to live in close proximity to where they worked. North Baton Rouge used to be very white working/middle class in close proximity to the refineries. That began to change as societal and cultural attitudes shifted in terms of living in proximity to industrial areas. Once that happened, the lower priced property became available for poorer people (many of whom were minorities) who could afford to live in those areas. These people have framed the argument that businesses have somehow targeted these poorer areas to put their evil pollution operations so they can say that it's some sort of nefarious plot that needs to be rectified.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49215 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 11:30 am to
This will just get filed in The Turtle's circular file with the rest of the bullshite the House has sent over.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram