- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:52 pm to the808bass
The saddest part is that that he can't see he has zero credibility unlike his hero, Steele apparently.
It's amazing to me that these radicals still come here and spout shite from biased sources.
It's amazing to me that these radicals still come here and spout shite from biased sources.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:53 pm to tigerinDC09
Link to you having zero credibility or are you strangely denying selling the Russian asset lie?
You have zero shame. That's clear.
You have zero shame. That's clear.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:54 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s a game to him. The saddest part is that he feels clever.
It's Mueller time next Wednesday.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:54 pm to tigerinDC09
Who did you vote for in 2016 ?
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Yes, we agree and this is what democrats asked for but the republican congress wouldn't allow for changes:
If this is the only argument you have left on this issue, then it's clear you have run out of substantive angles on why you still believe the Russian narrative is real.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:One question. Does this mean you got heem now??
tigerinDC09
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
It's Mueller time next Wednesday.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to roadGator
quote:
It's amazing to me that these radicals still come here and spout shite from biased sources.
You are mistaking me for the Q thread sir.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:Your dishonesty just proves you’re full of shite.
With this logic, how is a President who has lied thousands of times, credible about anything?
The FBI knew Steele was the source of the Isikoff article and still called it an “independent corroborating source” for the Dossier.
So the obvious point is how do you coordinate a clear INTENTIONAL MALICIOUS FRAUD like that and still allege the 2nd party to the purposeful fraud is “credible”?
In what fricking world is fraud of this nature not malicious intent? And in what fricking world is fraud ever associated with affording credibility to someone involved?
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:56 pm to tigerinDC09
So the “pee tape,” the disproven Trump–Russia espionage conspiracy, the closely coordinating Trump emissaries who- it turns out- do not even know each other, the trips and meetings that never happened, the undated and misdated reports, the supposed Russia expert who repeatedly misspelled the name of Alfa Bank as "Alpha"(Alfa is one of Russia's most important and readily recognized financial institutions in Russia) and at least one source who was some random, anonymous poster on a message board all have now somehow lent themselves to Steele being "credible"?
This sounds to me more like someone leaked fake information (you know, like when Anthony Scarramuci was linked to a Russian bank).
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
You are mistaking me for the Q thread sir.
Negative, ma'am.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to tigerinDC09
Please answer my question: who did you vote for in 2016? Thanks.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
hy you still believe the Russian narrative is real.
What is the "Russia narrative" in your opinion?
In my opinion, it is what's outlined in the Mueller report. As i know many in here haven't read it, just tune in next Wednesday, it'll be pretty informative.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to tigerinDC09
I am shocked that a FORMER frickING SPY is able to effectively lie to DOJ attorneys.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:59 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:Cling to Wednesday little kitty cling!
In my opinion, it is what's outlined in the Mueller report. As i know many in here haven't read it, just tune in next Wednesday, it'll be pretty informative.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:59 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
The FBI knew Steele was the source of the Isikoff article and still called it an “independent corroborating source” for the Dossier.
Are you not aware that an article can have more than 1 source?
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:59 pm to tigerinDC09
Are you not aware that an article can have more than 1 source?

Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:00 pm to NIH
quote:
Please answer my question: who did you vote for in 2016? Thanks.
Not "Individual-1"
Popular
Back to top


3








