Started By
Message

re: Horowitz's Investigators question Steele Dossier author, find him credible

Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:51 pm to
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

You have zero here after buying and then selling the Russian asset lie for 3 years.


Link?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154765 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:52 pm to
The saddest part is that that he can't see he has zero credibility unlike his hero, Steele apparently.

It's amazing to me that these radicals still come here and spout shite from biased sources.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154765 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:53 pm to
Link to you having zero credibility or are you strangely denying selling the Russian asset lie?

You have zero shame. That's clear.
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

It’s a game to him. The saddest part is that he feels clever.


It's Mueller time next Wednesday.

Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
120159 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:54 pm to
Who did you vote for in 2016 ?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138154 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Yes, we agree and this is what democrats asked for but the republican congress wouldn't allow for changes:

If this is the only argument you have left on this issue, then it's clear you have run out of substantive angles on why you still believe the Russian narrative is real.
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
20636 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

tigerinDC09
One question. Does this mean you got heem now??
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85050 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

It's Mueller time next Wednesday.

That's not going to go well for you.
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

It's amazing to me that these radicals still come here and spout shite from biased sources.


You are mistaking me for the Q thread sir.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46245 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to
Wow
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

With this logic, how is a President who has lied thousands of times, credible about anything?
Your dishonesty just proves you’re full of shite.

The FBI knew Steele was the source of the Isikoff article and still called it an “independent corroborating source” for the Dossier.

So the obvious point is how do you coordinate a clear INTENTIONAL MALICIOUS FRAUD like that and still allege the 2nd party to the purposeful fraud is “credible”?

In what fricking world is fraud of this nature not malicious intent? And in what fricking world is fraud ever associated with affording credibility to someone involved?
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57985 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:56 pm to

So the “pee tape,” the disproven Trump–Russia espionage conspiracy, the closely coordinating Trump emissaries who- it turns out- do not even know each other, the trips and meetings that never happened, the undated and misdated reports, the supposed Russia expert who repeatedly misspelled the name of Alfa Bank as "Alpha"(Alfa is one of Russia's most important and readily recognized financial institutions in Russia) and at least one source who was some random, anonymous poster on a message board all have now somehow lent themselves to Steele being "credible"?

This sounds to me more like someone leaked fake information (you know, like when Anthony Scarramuci was linked to a Russian bank).
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154765 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

You are mistaking me for the Q thread sir.


Negative, ma'am.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
120159 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to
Please answer my question: who did you vote for in 2016? Thanks.
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

hy you still believe the Russian narrative is real.


What is the "Russia narrative" in your opinion?

In my opinion, it is what's outlined in the Mueller report. As i know many in here haven't read it, just tune in next Wednesday, it'll be pretty informative.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112742 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:57 pm to
I am shocked that a FORMER frickING SPY is able to effectively lie to DOJ attorneys.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85050 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

In my opinion, it is what's outlined in the Mueller report. As i know many in here haven't read it, just tune in next Wednesday, it'll be pretty informative.

Cling to Wednesday little kitty cling!
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

The FBI knew Steele was the source of the Isikoff article and still called it an “independent corroborating source” for the Dossier.


Are you not aware that an article can have more than 1 source?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85050 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 12:59 pm to
Are you not aware that an article can have more than 1 source?
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Please answer my question: who did you vote for in 2016? Thanks.


Not "Individual-1"
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram