Started By
Message

re: Hobby Lobby decsion offers fodder for Democrat "War On Womenz" meme.

Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I get that.

The VA can only spend what Congress appropriates to it.
Who do you think will appropriate funds for public option and/or single payer?

quote:

People want to blame Shinseki and Obama for something that could have been prevented better funding (and therefore, better staffing) - something the VA has begged for ever since its inception.
Silliness. Why does every problem just need "better funding". We are out money. Look at the deficit.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 4:19 pm
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

I'm not that much of a simpleton.



Stopped reading here.

If that's how you're going to "discuss" this topic then you can just jack yourself off to the moon and back. I'm done.

I didn't insult anybody's intelligence. You took that low road.
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14488 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:24 pm to
Government's routine failures are commonly rewarded with more money. If only we had more money everything would be fine!

The VA is an example of government-run healthcare at work. As is Canada, where there exists some kind of fantasy that they have better healthcare than we do.

Prices in healthcare are excessive because of government intervention. I don't understand how the solution can be, "Well, government's failed so massively at controlling healthcare costs up to this point, why don't we give them total control? That'll fix it!"
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127400 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

DCRebel


Does not matter how good it is if you cannot get to it.

We have to put mechanisms in place to increase access. Your way is to increase supply (e.g. more budget, add providers, support staff, etc). My way (partially) is to reduce demand.

Bottom line, we need a co-pay system (to include DoD Tricare). It is amazing how much less you will use health care for routine matters if you have to pay for it (at least partially).
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

I didn't insult anybody's intelligence. You took that low road.
Oh good grief. If you're going to present a single-variable argument, do you expect not be taken for oversimplifying?
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 4:30 pm
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

you can just jack yourself off to the moon and back.


Now that I have your permission.........
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70529 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

you can just jack yourself off to the moon and back.


Now that I have your permission.........


Would be the farthest from Earth any Americans gotten during this Administration
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138931 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Prices in healthcare are excessive because of government intervention. I don't understand how the solution can be, "Well, government's failed so massively at controlling healthcare costs up to this point, why don't we give them total control? That'll fix it!"


Have an upvote.



Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:41 pm to
I'm enjoying the outrage and cries of the more radical leftists as they accept the reality of having government influence their health care coverage.

Just remember, this is exactly what they wanted. They wanted government deciding everything.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 4:42 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:56 pm to
My god, I hate ignorant politicans that do not understand that the company and health policies are not their property or the employees property for that matter. It does not belong to them, if the company doesn't offer what the woman wants, she should not work for them and she is not being forced to do so.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Ask any doctor who has worked for both the VA and the private healthcare sector. Let us know what it is that they tell you. You might be surprised.


I wasn't. Better benefits and time off. Sometimes scary follow up (or lack thereof) by support staff. And a generally less responsive system.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23008 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:05 pm to
Damn, you would think that the Supreme Court just ruled that women can't buy extra coverage to supplement their employer provided coverage. Hacks.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

I guess I am struggling with how this prevents a woman from going to CVS and buying condoms.

While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind) in no way does this prevent my wife and daughters from purchasing birth control.

A lot of non-sense about nothing.


Holy shite, this may be the best post you've ever made about ObamaCare.

I agree with you.

quote:

So male justices should recuse themselves from any case that might affect women?

Do we need an entirely separate government to make decisions that affect wimminz? One government for wimminz, one for bros?


Harry Reid is really the worst and most detestable politician there is in this country. You can feel and see the sleaze on him a mile away.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Statutory laws, like the ACA, cannot supercede Constitutional rights


This.

I hope conservatives and liberals alike know this, understand this and respect it.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

This is all a natural progression from our collective departure from treating employment as a contractual agreement (which it should be) and treating it a social construct used to further a political agenda.


Goddamn. You're right.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56552 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

This is all a natural progression from our collective departure from treating employment as a contractual agreement (which it should be) and treating it a social construct used to further a political agenda


Well put

But Obama says "You're just wrong Antonio"

"by they way, are you here legally?"
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49413 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

All the more reason for there to be a public option, right guys?!


I'm all for a public option so long as it is exclusively funded by those who participate. It can't be subsidized by tax revenue.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram