- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hobby Lobby decsion offers fodder for Democrat "War On Womenz" meme.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:10 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:10 pm to GumboPot
quote:
President Obama believes...women should make personal health care decisions for themselves
Good, let's start with them paying for it themselves as well.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:11 pm to Elcid96
quote:
President Obama believes...women should make personal health care decisions for themselves
quote:
Good, let's start with them paying for it themselves as well.
Yup. Too bad politicians don't want personal responsibility. How else can they force your tax dollars into the pockets of their donors?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:12 pm to Elcid96
It's some sort of liberal psychosis. They are like an entire population of 16 year olds. Ya know. They still want daddy to pay for everything but they'll be damned if daddy gets a say in how his money is spent.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:36 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Women—not their bosses—should be able to make their own health care decision
Who's stopping them?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Women—not their bosses—should be able to make their own health care decision
quote:
Who's stopping them?
quote:
their bosses
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:38 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
Who's stopping them?
quote:
their bosses
Explain.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:40 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
their bosses
Yeah, no.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:43 pm to Wolfhound45
I guess I am struggling with how this prevents a woman from going to CVS and buying condoms.
While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind) in no way does this prevent my wife and daughters from purchasing birth control.
A lot of non-sense about nothing.
While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind) in no way does this prevent my wife and daughters from purchasing birth control.
A lot of non-sense about nothing.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:47 pm to asurob1
I agree with Ginsburg when it comes to not allowing women in these for-profit organizations coverage for contraceptives even if they don't subscribe the to organization's beliefs.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:47 pm to asurob1
quote:
guess I am struggling with how this prevents a woman from going to CVS and buying condoms.
While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind) in no way does this prevent my wife and daughters from purchasing birth control.
A lot of non-sense about nothing.
I think the argument is that they are prevented from getting free (or heavily discounted) BC through their employer. But, according to their mentality, "the pill" is the only sort of acceptable BC.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:48 pm to asurob1
quote:
I guess I am struggling with how this prevents a woman from going to CVS and buying condoms.
While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind) in no way does this prevent my wife and daughters from purchasing birth control.
A lot of non-sense about nothing.
this.
Hey, me and asurob agree on something!
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:49 pm to asurob1
quote:
While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind)
Your bigotry is downright humorous at times.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It's time that five men on the Supreme Court stop deciding what happens to women.
So male justices should recuse themselves from any case that might affect women?
Do we need an entirely separate government to make decisions that affect wimminz? One government for wimminz, one for bros?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:50 pm to asurob1
quote:
I guess I am struggling with how this prevents a woman from going to CVS and buying condoms.
While I dislike Hobby Lobby and other companies of their ilk (Chik-a-fil comes to mind) in no way does this prevent my wife and daughters from purchasing birth control.
A lot of non-sense about nothing.
frick. I just agreed with asurob1, will never forgive SCOTUS for this
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:51 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:It's not about contraceptives. Only abortion inducing drugs.
I agree with Ginsburg when it comes to not allowing women in these for-profit organizations coverage for contraceptives even if they don't subscribe the to organization's beliefs.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:53 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
So male justices should recuse themselves from any case that might affect women?
Do we need an entirely separate government to make decisions that affect wimminz? One government for wimminz, one for bros?
Get out of here, cock-man-oppressor!
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:53 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I think the argument is that they are prevented from getting free (or heavily discounted) BC through their employer. But, according to their mentality, "the pill" is the only sort of acceptable BC.
funny...if i want to go pick up that lil blue pill...my boss isn't helping me get a discount.
Their mentality is out of whack here. Nothing in life is free.
If they want their boss to pay for their Birth Control then they need to do a better job negotiating that benefit when they are hired.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:53 pm to kingbob
quote:
this.
Hey, me and asurob agree on something!
quiet you :P
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:53 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
It's not about contraceptives. Only abortion inducing drugs.
They fall under the same category, no?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 1:53 pm to TK421
quote:
Your bigotry is downright humorous at times.
I am witty.
Popular
Back to top


2








