re: Hillary Clinton spent $10 million dollars for Obama to approve fake Russia investigation

Well, would you look at that. Computer search missed that. Werid.

But it was an attempted overthrow, undercut, oust, bring down, diminish, hinder...

Spell it any way you want, it was illegal AF, and parties involved need to face criminal penalties.

quote:

---

This article is from 2022, so it’s no longer valid

-SFP

---

Now, conspiracy to * overthrow the United States government has no statute of limitations.




* And that's from the X post itself, not me saying that. This is far more involvement than anything concocted in the J6 entrapment attempt.,

quote:

---

So even your dot-connecting falls miles short of showing a plan to "overthrow" Trump.

---

Arguing semantics is all you can do.

The simple truth is that democrats tried to prevent Americans from having their rightful representation.

Call it overthrow, call it usurp, call it subvert, call it whatever you want. It doesn't change the fact that they created false evidence to sway the election and then used that false evidence to prevent the American people from having their duly elected president work for them instead of fighting bullshite lawfare.

And it doesn't change the fact that you're doing your damnedest, albeit poorly, to deflect from one political party stealing the rights of Americans and making a mockery of the republic. They tried to ruin a foundational principle of the country, and you run defense for them endlessly.

quote:

---

There is basically no evidence HRC did anything outside of helping create the dossier. Any collusion by HRC ends there.

---

and there you have it.

"plausible deniability" = the hallmark of all the evils committed by the Democult establishment in the past 20 years.

With a complicit media devoting 99.44% of their time to gaslighting the public & with unlimited funding from all the fraudulent "help the needy" scams keep mouths shut & with brigades of crooked judges set to throw months and months of 'due process' delays into any investigation that even comes close to unravelling the gordian knot we just have to sit back and endure the planned dismantling of the greatest civilization known to have ever existed.

And once they have their titular "Biden" or "Kamala" or "Omar" leadership installed into the puppet regime they will have congratulatory ceremonies for all the useful idiots who paved their way

" SFP = Job well done!! "

as they toss him into the same gutter with the rest of us, once his usefulness has expired.

quote:

---

And it doesn't change the fact that you're doing your damnedest, albeit poorly, to deflect from one political party stealing the rights of Americans and making a mockery of the republic.

---

No I'm pointing out terrible arguments and histrionics like your post.

In no way is that a defense of DEMs.

quote:

---

and you run defense for them endlessly.

---

Show me a post where I defended what HRC did

quote:

---

With a complicit media devoting 99.44% of their time to gaslighting the public & with unlimited funding from all the fraudulent "help the needy" scams keep mouths shut & with brigades of crooked judges set to throw months and months of 'due process' delays into any investigation that even comes close to unravelling the gordian knot we just have to sit back and endure the planned dismantling of the greatest civilization known to have ever existed.

And once they have their titular "Biden" or "Kamala" or "Omar" leadership installed into the puppet regime they will have congratulatory ceremonies for all the useful idiots who paved their way

---

In all of this melting you failed to include anything else HRC did.

You do realize that right?

quote:

---

Spell it any way you want, it was illegal AF, and parties involved need to face criminal penalties.

---

quote:

---

ETA: I await for you to pivot from your own words, specifically "overthrow"

---

quote:

---

Any comment on HRC's involvement other than mockery - or info leading to a subpoena - is craven worship of the scum.

---

What? For discussion purposes ITT we assumed participation.

The issue is her actual participation vs. the mythological grand conspiracy being convicted, specifically to "overthrow" a sitting President.

Again, I will remind you that Obama was the President when her collusion occurred. Was she trying to overthrow Obama?

Here you are defending tLeft

You are the one in denial

quote:

---

What? For discussion purposes ITT we assumed participation.

The issue is her actual participation vs. the mythological grand conspiracy being convicted, specifically to "overthrow" a sitting President.

Again, I will remind you that Obama was the President when her collusion occurred. Was she trying to overthrow Obama?

---

"Actual participation" vs. "the mythological grand conspiracy" = well, I gotta admit = we don't have the iron-clad, smoking gun, blatantly obvious self-evident 'evidence' that you were satisfied with during the past 10 years of attacking Trump every hour of every day since 2016.

In case it may have gone way over your head = the primary 'discussion' on this topic concerns the blatant difference in coverage/investigation of the two events - both by those whose job it is to actually investigate crimes, and those whose job it is to ignore the crimes by gaslighting the public.

We all presume you are in the latter category.

Now I will admit that you do a good job of impersonating a participant in a mock trial.

or a bit part in a skit designed for comedy.