Herridge just posted Flynn transcripts

"sent to Congress"?

WTF?

foxnews.com

Politico just aggregated this with their twist of course.

politico.com

Strike 1. Grenell released his shite directly to the public. frick sending it to congress.

Grassley and Johnson will release whatever is declassified.

I don’t trust Radcliffe after this though. He definitely had to release the last thing Grenell declassified but I think he will slow play the rest.

quote:

---

thought Grenell leaked the unmaking list to two Republicans in congress who then released it? Grassley if i'm not mistaken?

---

Grassley and Johnson. The only 2 that have never blinked on the whole Flynn fiasco.

quote:

---

Okay, sent to some R's, that is better

---

Well, maybe

quote:

---

Strike 1. Grenell released his shite directly to the public. frick sending it to congress.

---

Send congress a link to it on a public server.

Let everyone see it.

Can any of you garbage leftists point me to the part when sanctions were discussed? Not expulsions, but the sanctions Flynn was charged with lying about? Thanks in advance

quote:

---

Flynn goes on to say the U.S. and Russia "definitely have a common enemy. You have a problem with it. We have a problem with it in this country and we definitely have a problem with it in the Middle East."

Flynn says, "Remember Ambassador, you are not talking to a diplomat; you are talking to a soldier. I am a very practical guy. It is all about solutions. "

Kislyak, according to the summary, was "looking for an opportunity to have a longer conversation. Flynn says, maybe the end of next week."
How John Ratcliffe will impact intelligence collectionVideo

The summary also reveals that Kislyak says that "the Kremlin would like to convey to the President-elect to organize a conversation via secure video line between the White House and the Kremlin that should be available starting January 20th and to have a first conversation on January 21 st between the presidents." The summary states that Kislyak said "Putin's idea is to congratulate Trump and discuss issues." Flynn told Kislyak that he understands, and Kislyak "repeats that he is talking about secure video line."

The transcript of the Flynn-Kislyak call on Dec. 22, 2016, which was picked up in surveillance and later leaked to the Washington Post, was also declassified by Grenell and shared with lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

A congressional source familiar with the surveillance told Fox News earlier this month that Flynn’s name was not redacted in the initial report about his calls with Kislyak, and that his name from the unredacted transcript of the calls was then leaked to the press.

The timeline of that activity already strongly suggested that the numerous, recently revealed requests to "unmask" Flynn pertained to other reports. The source noted that Flynn’s calls with Kislyak took place during the presidential transition period on Dec. 22, 2016 and Dec. 29, 2016. The source then noted that a majority of the known Flynn unmasking requests from top Obama officials came prior to Flynn’s calls with Kislyak on those dates.

According to the list of officials involved in requests to unmask Flynn's name, which was declassified by acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell last week and made public by GOP senators, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power made five unmasking requests prior to Flynn’s first call with Kislyak — spanning Nov. 30, 2016 and Dec. 14, 2016. Power later made requests on Dec. 23, 2016 and Jan. 17, 2017.

Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper also made an unmasking request for Flynn on Dec. 2, 2016, which also was prior to the Kislyak conversations; then-CIA Director John Brennan made requests on Dec. 14 and Dec. 15, 2016; and then-FBI Director James Comey made a request on Dec. 15, 2016.

The list shows that more than two-dozen Obama administration officials made such unmasking requests prior to his calls with Kislyak on Dec. 22, 2016.

Unmasking occurs after U.S. citizens' conversations are incidentally picked up in conversations with foreign officials who are being monitored by the intelligence community. The U.S. citizens' identities are supposed to be protected if their participation is incidental and no wrongdoing is suspected. However, officials can determine the U.S. citizens' names through a process that is supposed to safeguard their rights.

---