- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Here is the Interview from the Ukrainian... Trump Admin has an AUDIO recording
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:46 pm
It talks about NABU and agents with secret apartments...But most of all... There is a recorded conversation:
One would think that's all and it couldn't be worse. Right?
LINK
You will need a translater if you don't speak the language.
quote:
There was a time when it was necessary to admit: NABU is ineffective, its leader needs to be changed. This provokes resistance from the US ambassador. Why? I think because the NABU leader intervened in US politics during the US presidential election [in 2016 on the Democrats' side]. Mr. Sytnik, despite Nazar Kholodnitsky's ban, announced pre-trial investigation that the Party of Regions' "black box" lists have [Chief of Donald Trump's election headquarters] Paul Manafort. True, he neglected to say that there was [former Presidential Advisor to President Barack Obama] Gregory Craig there .
When Kholodnitsky asked him why he did it, he said he wanted to help [Donald Trump's rival] Hillary Clinton.
These revelations by the NABU chief have caused a storm in the United States.
I do not know how, but the Americans have received an audio recording of Mr. Sytnik's conversation: he is resting with his family and friends and discussing how Hillary would like to help. Part of this audio recording was made public by MP Borislav Rosenblatt. And he gave me a statement. Honestly, I was uncomfortable with taking the document out of his hands because it was not for Rosenblatt to fight corruption in Ukraine. But I am obliged by law to consider it, and now the case [about interference with the US presidential election] is being investigated by the HBB.
Here's the answer to why Mrs. US Ambassador Marie Jovanovic defends Sytnik. It seems obvious to me
One would think that's all and it couldn't be worse. Right?
LINK
You will need a translater if you don't speak the language.
2
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:48 pm to Jjdoc
Recordings are all well and good, but I'm gonna need hearsay and lots of it.
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:51 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
Even then it's all gonna depend on how it makes you feel afterwards. We'll have to test your array of feelings and then you may issue an opinion.
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:52 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
I'm gonna need hearsay and lots of it.
Well, as I learned on Wednesday, it’s actually more reliable than first hand accounts.
This post was edited on 11/15/19 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 11/15/19 at 10:56 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
Someone's interpretation of what those words really meant, is far more valuable than actually hearing the words themselves. Let's run this by everyone who was in the building(s) at the time and present their opinion first. These facts are nonsense.
-Every liberal.
-Every liberal.
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:01 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Well, as I learned on Wednesday, it’s actually more reliable than first hand accounts.
And believe it or not, the fella who said it is a lawyer.
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:07 pm to davyjones
quote:
nd believe it or not, the fella who said it is a lawyer.
Then he’s a Failure on so many levels.
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:08 pm to Robin Masters
Well, look at the agenda, they can’t use facts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:14 pm to Robin Masters
Yessir, and if I recall correctly he even framed the statement by saying something to the effect of "As we've learned in many painful situations, hearsay can be better than direct..." I believe he was also referring to instances of criminal conviction based on hearsay evidence. Described such instances as "painful".
Painful things are typically the route that we seek to avoid if I'm not mistaken. For all sorts of reasons.
Painful things are typically the route that we seek to avoid if I'm not mistaken. For all sorts of reasons.
Posted on 11/15/19 at 11:35 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:lol!
Recordings are all well and good, but I'm gonna need hearsay and lots of it.
Posted on 11/16/19 at 6:02 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Well, as I learned on Wednesday, it’s actually more reliable than first hand accounts.
I know your joking but the Republicans on the committee should do an open test among the committee members live on TV.
A committee member on the far side of the panel will whisper a statement into another committee members ear. Then he will tell the same story in the same way to next committee member, and so forth until nearly the entire committee heard the story. The last person will need to say the story out loud and the first person will corroborate or deny the facts in the story. That is why in a court of law hearsay is inadmissible, but in a kangaroo court of politics hearsay is okay.
Posted on 11/16/19 at 6:59 am to davyjones
quote:
And believe it or not, the fella who said it is a lawyer.
That actually makes it more believable because the "law" is a sham set up to be manipulated by those who are "expert" at the "rules".
Nothing about the law is about the pursuit of the truth.
Posted on 11/16/19 at 7:13 am to davyjones
quote:
We'll have to test your array of feelings and then you may issue an opinion.
They'll have to take one of those "where are you politically" online quizzes. If they don't fall in the bottom left quadrant, their testimony is unnecessary and they probably should face criminal indictment for some process crime.
Posted on 11/16/19 at 7:14 am to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
Recordings are all well and good, but I'm gonna need hearsay and lots of it.
/\
/\Posted on 11/16/19 at 8:42 am to ChineseBandit58
It is frightening to think an elected official, that is a damn lawyer on top of it, would say that.
Posted on 11/16/19 at 8:44 am to Jjdoc
That's all fine and dandy, but what did the FEEL like he said?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News