- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hawaii judge blocks Trumps latest travel ban
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:02 pm
Per AP twitter:
rinse
repeat
LINK
quote:
BREAKING: US judge in Hawaii blocks latest version of Trump administration's travel ban hours before it was set to take effect.
rinse
repeat
LINK
quote:
A federal judge in Hawaii on Tuesday issued an order blocking major parts of President Trump’s newest travel ban, suggesting it violated immigration law.
The decision from U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu stops the administration’s travel restrictions nationwide before they were scheduled to take full effect Wednesday.
The newest travel rules, issued on Sept. 24, indefinitely ban entry to the U.S. by most nationals of Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea. They also restrict travel by certain Venezuelan government officials and their families.
Watson’s order, issued in response to a lawsuit filed by the state of Hawaii, a Honolulu-based mosque, its imam and two state residents who have relatives in the affected countries, stops the government from enforcing the new restrictions on travel from all of the nations except North Korea and Venezuela.
Challengers to the ban said it would hurt Hawaii’s state university system, which has students, professors and visitors from the blocked countries, as well as the Hawaii tourism industry. Individuals who sued said the ban would prevent their relatives from immigrating to the U.S. and visiting.
Government lawyers said in court filings that Trump’s travel order falls within his power as president and was written after a review of security vetting procedures for nations around the world.
The judge’s decision is a temporary measure while a lawsuit over the legality of the travel ban proceeds.
The Department of Justice, which has argued that the ban is needed to protect Americans from potential terrorism, is expected to challenge the ruling.
In March, Watson issued an order blocking a previous version of the ban in a case that, coupled with a similar one in a federal court in Maryland, was set for arguments in the Supreme Court. This month, justices canceled Oct. 10 arguments and dropped the case because the prior ban — which was temporary — had expired and was replaced by the new one.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:03 pm to sicboy
#resist
Pussy Hat brigade strikes again
Pussy Hat brigade strikes again
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:03 pm to sicboy
Well, time to make Trump win again.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:04 pm to sicboy
The activist judge needs to be impeached over his bias and inability to be impartial.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:04 pm to sicboy
This is absolutely ridiculous
I thought the Supreme Court already overruled?
I thought the Supreme Court already overruled?
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:05 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
The activist judge needs to be impeached over his bias and inability to be impartial.
I prefer arrested for sedition and hung by the nearest pole
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:07 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
I thought the Supreme Court already overruled?
They did when it was only Muslim countries, and because the argument against it was 'muh racism'.
Now that we've included Norks and people on the latest marx diet, I'm interested to see what the challenge is and how it's soooooooo much different.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:07 pm to sicboy
At some point, the President simply needs to reply to this by saying, "Supreme Court Already decided".
I mean, this is silly. We have local courts trying to overrule the Supreme Court.
I mean, this is silly. We have local courts trying to overrule the Supreme Court.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:10 pm to Giant Leaf
quote:You seem the type that would settle for bamboo splinters up under his fingernails. Would that satisfy you? No need to hang anyone.
prefer arrested for sedition and hung by the nearest pole
Yet.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:10 pm to sicboy
Pack up current Muslims Obama brought in and ship them to Hawaii. They said they need diversity so let them have it. Those same diversity preachers will be complaining about how the Muslims don't respect their culture in short order especially after the blaring of the call to prayer.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:11 pm to HubbaBubba
no kind of angry like a trumpkin angry
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:11 pm to sicboy
It's like they enjoy getting kicked in the teeth by the USSC.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:11 pm to sicboy
It was originally touted as a means to get a handle on vetting who was entering the country as it was, according to DJT, endangering our safety.
Are we any closer to a process of "extreme" vetting for visitors that enter our country? Are we safer?
Are we any closer to a process of "extreme" vetting for visitors that enter our country? Are we safer?
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:12 pm to sicboy
Can’t wait to hear the people who whine about people continually filing cases over “settled law” start cheerleading this asshat again.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:13 pm to bamarep
quote:
It's like they enjoy getting kicked in the teeth by the USSC.
Disbarment to all of those judges
U.S. Code › Title 28 › Part I › Chapter 7 › § 177
28 U.S. Code § 177 - Disbarment of removed judges
US Code
A judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims removed from office in accordance with section 176 of this title shall not be permitted at any time to practice before the Court of Federal Claims.
(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §?105(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 28; amended Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §?902(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:13 pm to sicboy
I mean, this is just straight up activism on the bench. Guy clearly can't do his job and should be removed.
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:14 pm to sicboy
So you're fine with activist judges ignoring laws?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News