Started By
Message
locked post

Hawaii judge blocks Trumps latest travel ban

Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:02 pm
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77568 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:02 pm
Per AP twitter:

quote:

BREAKING: US judge in Hawaii blocks latest version of Trump administration's travel ban hours before it was set to take effect.



rinse


repeat

LINK

quote:

A federal judge in Hawaii on Tuesday issued an order blocking major parts of President Trump’s newest travel ban, suggesting it violated immigration law.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu stops the administration’s travel restrictions nationwide before they were scheduled to take full effect Wednesday.

The newest travel rules, issued on Sept. 24, indefinitely ban entry to the U.S. by most nationals of Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea. They also restrict travel by certain Venezuelan government officials and their families.

Watson’s order, issued in response to a lawsuit filed by the state of Hawaii, a Honolulu-based mosque, its imam and two state residents who have relatives in the affected countries, stops the government from enforcing the new restrictions on travel from all of the nations except North Korea and Venezuela.

Challengers to the ban said it would hurt Hawaii’s state university system, which has students, professors and visitors from the blocked countries, as well as the Hawaii tourism industry. Individuals who sued said the ban would prevent their relatives from immigrating to the U.S. and visiting.

Government lawyers said in court filings that Trump’s travel order falls within his power as president and was written after a review of security vetting procedures for nations around the world.

The judge’s decision is a temporary measure while a lawsuit over the legality of the travel ban proceeds.

The Department of Justice, which has argued that the ban is needed to protect Americans from potential terrorism, is expected to challenge the ruling.

In March, Watson issued an order blocking a previous version of the ban in a case that, coupled with a similar one in a federal court in Maryland, was set for arguments in the Supreme Court. This month, justices canceled Oct. 10 arguments and dropped the case because the prior ban — which was temporary — had expired and was replaced by the new one.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 2:08 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139824 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:03 pm to
#resist

Pussy Hat brigade strikes again
Posted by biggsc
32.4767389, 35.5697717
Member since Mar 2009
34209 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:03 pm to
Won't last long
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21233 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:03 pm to
Well, time to make Trump win again.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21856 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:03 pm to
Don't care
Posted by biggsc
32.4767389, 35.5697717
Member since Mar 2009
34209 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:04 pm to
9th circuit I guess?

Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45715 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:04 pm to
The activist judge needs to be impeached over his bias and inability to be impartial.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69263 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:04 pm to
This is absolutely ridiculous

I thought the Supreme Court already overruled?
Posted by Giant Leaf
On Leaf
Member since Nov 2015
4229 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

The activist judge needs to be impeached over his bias and inability to be impartial.



I prefer arrested for sedition and hung by the nearest pole
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

I thought the Supreme Court already overruled?



They did when it was only Muslim countries, and because the argument against it was 'muh racism'.

Now that we've included Norks and people on the latest marx diet, I'm interested to see what the challenge is and how it's soooooooo much different.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:07 pm to
At some point, the President simply needs to reply to this by saying, "Supreme Court Already decided".

I mean, this is silly. We have local courts trying to overrule the Supreme Court.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45715 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

prefer arrested for sedition and hung by the nearest pole
You seem the type that would settle for bamboo splinters up under his fingernails. Would that satisfy you? No need to hang anyone.



Yet.

Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5343 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:10 pm to
Pack up current Muslims Obama brought in and ship them to Hawaii. They said they need diversity so let them have it. Those same diversity preachers will be complaining about how the Muslims don't respect their culture in short order especially after the blaring of the call to prayer.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77568 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:11 pm to
no kind of angry like a trumpkin angry
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51798 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:11 pm to
It's like they enjoy getting kicked in the teeth by the USSC.
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:11 pm to
It was originally touted as a means to get a handle on vetting who was entering the country as it was, according to DJT, endangering our safety.

Are we any closer to a process of "extreme" vetting for visitors that enter our country? Are we safer?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94915 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:12 pm to
Can’t wait to hear the people who whine about people continually filing cases over “settled law” start cheerleading this asshat again.
Posted by biggsc
32.4767389, 35.5697717
Member since Mar 2009
34209 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

It's like they enjoy getting kicked in the teeth by the USSC.

Disbarment to all of those judges

U.S. Code › Title 28 › Part I › Chapter 7 › § 177
28 U.S. Code § 177 - Disbarment of removed judges
US Code
A judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims removed from office in accordance with section 176 of this title shall not be permitted at any time to practice before the Court of Federal Claims.
(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §?105(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 28; amended Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §?902(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
7521 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:13 pm to
I mean, this is just straight up activism on the bench. Guy clearly can't do his job and should be removed.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 2:14 pm to
So you're fine with activist judges ignoring laws?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram