- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:02 am to SUB
quote:
What is the source for him being in his underwear?
The one I read was KTVU.
quote:
Same thing goes for Pelosi saying he was a friend.
That's literally the the dispatch audio.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:09 am to Foy
What’s your wife’s boyfriend think?
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:22 am to Jjdoc
quote:
The one I read was KTVU.
From that article. LINK
quote:
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him.
So why is everyone so quick to believe the details about the underwear? It’s being repeated over and over on these threads and there seems to be no source for this information. I get it for the other stuff on the dispatch audio. But this?
This post was edited on 10/29/22 at 9:26 am
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:24 am to SUB
quote:
quote:
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him.
So why is everyone so quick to believe the details about the underwear? It’s being repeated over and over on these threads and there seems to be no source for this information. I get it for the other stuff on the dispatch audio. But this?
Because multiple sources are report it.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/29/22 at 9:34 am
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:45 am to SUB
quote:
So why is everyone so quick to believe the details about the underwear? It’s being repeated over and over on these threads and there seems to be no source for this information. I get it for the other stuff on the dispatch audio. But this?
A quick peek at the police body cam videos can confirm this if SFPD uses them. Also, any nearby security cameras could have caught the perp when they walked him to the car.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:50 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Cause he’s a maga nutjob
quote:
Lester Earl

Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:50 am to Jjdoc
So, no concern at all that it was retracted from the source, FOX KTVU, that you gave? Perhaps the pundit on the clip you gave (Fox News segment) used this as his source also? If there were legs to this, don’t you think Fox News would have this detail as a headline? Or literally any other conservative site? Or are we going with a mass coverup ?conspiracy on this detail?
This post was edited on 10/29/22 at 9:53 am
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:53 am to SUB
quote:
So, no concern at all that it was retracted from the source, FOX KTVU, that you gave? Perhaps the pundit on the clip you gave (Fox News segment) used this as his source also? If there were legs to this, don’t you think Fox News would have this detail as a headline? Or are we going with a mass coverup conspiracy on this detail?
I believe everyone will bury a story if a powerful person tells them to do it. Including Fox News, even if it's a democrat.
The bigger problem is you not believing that. You probably do if it's the the correct circumstances, yes?
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:55 am to GRTiger
quote:
The bigger problem is you not believing that. You probably do if it's the the correct circumstances, yes?
I believe something if there is objective evidence that it is true. There has yet to be any provided. Every news site that has included the detail about the underwear has said KTVU is the source of the info, who retracted that statement.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:55 am to SUB
quote:
KTVU is the source of the info, who retracted that statement.
Why? What did they say?
Posted on 10/29/22 at 9:57 am to GRTiger
Posted on 10/29/22 at 10:00 am to SUB
Lol, ok. Strange misstatement to say the least, but I guess absurd misteaks happen.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 10:03 am to Jjdoc
I thought Paul Pelosi only got hammered when he was behind the wheel?
Posted on 10/29/22 at 10:05 am to Cromulent
Definitely gay sex stuff and dude got mad for some reason and was threatening to tell Nancy and got violent. Pretty simple really.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 10:13 am to SUB
quote:
So, no concern at all that it was retracted from the source, FOX KTVU, that you gave?
None at all! Like I said multiple sources reported it.
quote:
Perhaps the pundit on the clip you gave (Fox News segment) used this as his source also?
Or perhaps not.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 10:18 am to GRTiger
quote:
believe everyone will bury a story if a powerful person tells them to do it. Including Fox News, even if it's a democrat.
Newt Gingrich was talking about George Soros one day on Fox News and the anchor stopped him mid sentence and said they can't talk about Soros. Newt was stunned.
Fox is also owned and ran by liberals so no surprise there
Posted on 10/29/22 at 10:47 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Like I said multiple sources reported it.
Multiple new sites (not sources) reported that a source (KTVU) reported it, which has now been retracted. There is no other “source” for this information. If there is, please share.
This post was edited on 10/29/22 at 10:48 am
Posted on 10/29/22 at 11:03 am to SUB
I hope gay leftists are watching this and wondering why the party that celebrates homosexuality and scoffs at monogamy and marriage is going hard and deep to 86 this story.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 12:24 pm to Jjdoc
Because he is a crazy person?
Popular
Back to top


1









