- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GOP has handled K. Brown Jackson the wrong way
Posted on 3/23/22 at 6:53 am to TrueTiger
Posted on 3/23/22 at 6:53 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Instead of questions, simply convey congratulations to her on being a black woman. Because being a black woman is such huge accomplishment. Agree that that is the only thing that makes her deserving of the position.
Yeah cause the media would never spin that to make the GOP look racist.
Say what you want but Brown has handled the situation well, and has done a good job in the hearings. Maybe the GOP should not all ask the same question and try could expose more.
Brown is also more qualified than the Obama picks
Posted on 3/23/22 at 6:56 am to loogaroo
quote:
Miss Lindsey seems more pissed than normal.
All a show with Graham. He wants a judge from SC and he also confirmed Brown last year to the court of appeals. Im sure he will vote for her again.
All the questions is just political theater they should just save time and move to the votes
This post was edited on 3/23/22 at 6:58 am
Posted on 3/23/22 at 6:56 am to squid_hunt
quote:
The best way to beat the left is just to go along with everything they do. That'll show 'em.
I disagree. The strategy in my OP is NOT for everything.
It should be deployed only in special cases. This is one.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 6:57 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
Brown is also more qualified than the Obama picks
Just want to point out that Merrick Garland was portrayed as a moderate and steady pick. He's as radical as they come in the DOJ. She is a trainwreck activist with no regard for the rule of law.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 6:58 am to TrueTiger
Do you really think the media would report on this clever strategy of exposing her nomination to ridicule or that much the public would catch on to the subtlety if they were so exposed.
The story line would be "All agree to the excellence of the nomination and the value of role models on the Supreme Court."
The story line would be "All agree to the excellence of the nomination and the value of role models on the Supreme Court."
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:02 am to CarrolltonTiger
Not if many one of them made this statement with their vote:
"I am agreeing with the president that you are qualified due to you being a black woman" Congratulations.
That would actually sting.
"I am agreeing with the president that you are qualified due to you being a black woman" Congratulations.
That would actually sting.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:03 am to TrueTiger
quote:
It should be deployed only in special cases. This is one.
Don't give an inch to the left. You don't have to make a fool of yourself, but agreeing is giving an inch where they will run a mile. I think they've done a good job making lemonade out of lemons and they've even managed to remind everyone how crazy the Dems were on Kavanaugh and Barret.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:06 am to udtiger
quote:
Regardless if any of it was true.
This definitely would have been done by the Democrats if it was a Conservative pick.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:27 am to TrueTiger
She’s easy on pedos, she should be kicked out of the hearings. Trash.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:27 am to squid_hunt
quote:
they've even managed to remind everyone how crazy the Dems were on Kavanaugh and Barret.
That the collective memory of the people needed reminding,
says a lot.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:31 am to TrueTiger
quote:
That the collective memory of the people needed reminding,
I agree 100%. Nevertheless...
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:32 am to TrueTiger
I somewhat agree -
BUT it seems to me that a lot of the GOP rage was directed at the feckless DEMOCRATs on their hypocrisy and outright thuggery during their questioning of all GOP appointees.
Trying to "take down" this - or any nominee from POTatUS is not going to bear any fruit. The only thing they can achieve is more ridicule of the mendacity inherent in any DEMOCRAT political action.
BUT it seems to me that a lot of the GOP rage was directed at the feckless DEMOCRATs on their hypocrisy and outright thuggery during their questioning of all GOP appointees.
Trying to "take down" this - or any nominee from POTatUS is not going to bear any fruit. The only thing they can achieve is more ridicule of the mendacity inherent in any DEMOCRAT political action.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:53 am to VoxDawg
She will get 65 votes, regardless of what is said. Ms. Lindsay already was fawning all over her before she was even selected.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 7:56 am to TrueTiger
You are misunderstanding the politics of the situation.
There is a 99% chance she is confirmed and if she wasn't there will be another one right behind her. The only thing that will take her down is something REALLY bad that was missed in vetting and that's very unlikely. On that you are correct.
The thing is though you are looking at this as a way for the GOP to try to win voters. That's not going to happen, not in the way you think. This is about not LOSING voters. There are millions of conservatives that are furious about how Trump's nominees were treated and even more that are pissed about CRT and judges that think the law is just whatever they want it to be.
If the GOP Senators don't ask tough questions and at least put up a fight they will lose part of their base and show that they don't care. People voted for them because they want someone to represent them and not to sit back and take it. Also not fighting will only embolden the Dems and MSM further. You have to fight for every inch.
The best example of why your strategy doesn't work is RBG. She was nominated after Bork and Thomas when Clinton got in office and the GOP overwhelmingly confirmed her to try to show that politics shouldn't be a part of the process. She was a radical but was given a pass. The result? Dems kept getting more radical and RBG became a Saint to them, 90% of Americans now think she was the first woman on the Supreme Court and she is treated like some great legal mind even though she authored no significant opinions.
You have to fight. Fight on issues where you have the high ground but you have to fight.
There is a 99% chance she is confirmed and if she wasn't there will be another one right behind her. The only thing that will take her down is something REALLY bad that was missed in vetting and that's very unlikely. On that you are correct.
The thing is though you are looking at this as a way for the GOP to try to win voters. That's not going to happen, not in the way you think. This is about not LOSING voters. There are millions of conservatives that are furious about how Trump's nominees were treated and even more that are pissed about CRT and judges that think the law is just whatever they want it to be.
If the GOP Senators don't ask tough questions and at least put up a fight they will lose part of their base and show that they don't care. People voted for them because they want someone to represent them and not to sit back and take it. Also not fighting will only embolden the Dems and MSM further. You have to fight for every inch.
The best example of why your strategy doesn't work is RBG. She was nominated after Bork and Thomas when Clinton got in office and the GOP overwhelmingly confirmed her to try to show that politics shouldn't be a part of the process. She was a radical but was given a pass. The result? Dems kept getting more radical and RBG became a Saint to them, 90% of Americans now think she was the first woman on the Supreme Court and she is treated like some great legal mind even though she authored no significant opinions.
You have to fight. Fight on issues where you have the high ground but you have to fight.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:16 am to Bourre
This nomination won't change any of that even by a fraction of a point. At this point she is in a distinct minority on the court. Let them have her. 6-3 majority right now and 6-3 after. You could get her nomination withdrawn and the next day Biden would put up someone else you object to.
Under the current make up her only function is that of a useless academic writing and supporting stuff that no one will remember because hers was a minority opinion. She's dangerous to trees at this juncture.
Under the current make up her only function is that of a useless academic writing and supporting stuff that no one will remember because hers was a minority opinion. She's dangerous to trees at this juncture.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:19 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Yes, similar idea. Turbocharging a bad idea is sometimes the best way to destroy it.
Example: Let's say the left wants the income tax rate to 90%?
Agree with it and deploy it as quickly as possible. The idea would be dead in a few weeks, maybe days.
Or the Covid relief stuff under Trump, which has caused massive inflation that we're feeling today. That killed BBB and we're likely not even feeling the inflation from the Biden printing yet
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:19 am to aggressor
quote:
You have to fight.
Sometimes the fight is not worth the prize.
This is the prize:

Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:21 am to Smokeyone
quote:
you would cry that the republicans were not doing anything but rubber stamping the nomination.
She's in. The battle and war have been lost.
She's replacing a leftist, so the net effect is 0. The GOP has a 6-3 advantage in the USSC. Save the bullets for a Thomas replacement.
Why invest major resources in a guaranteed loss? Why invest resources that will be flipped against you, making the loss bigger?
Just makes no sense.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:23 am to TrueTiger
The media is going to write their own copy regardless.
If she gets contested, it is “GOP makes this a circus!”
If she doesn’t get contested, the next shitbird nominee gets articles of “Why did they not get the Brown Jackson treatment?”
I’d rather point out what a horrible fricking idea it is to put this nimrod on SCOTUS than wave her along for some good press.
If she gets contested, it is “GOP makes this a circus!”
If she doesn’t get contested, the next shitbird nominee gets articles of “Why did they not get the Brown Jackson treatment?”
I’d rather point out what a horrible fricking idea it is to put this nimrod on SCOTUS than wave her along for some good press.
Popular
Back to top


1







